YouTuber. Filmmaker. VFX artist. Nerd. Threat to democracy.

Joined July 2009
14,003 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
3
7
3,625
Shane Killian retweeted
Blake's 7: One of the view things I love that they haven't remade, rebooted or brought back and ruined... yet
43
13
159
6,249
This is ridiculous! How is it that a stupid-ass fake Rabbi can rail against porn, saying it causes LITERAL demons to enter your soul, and get 10,000 views, and I point out why he's talking complete and utter crap but my video gets buried in the algorithm? Why does stupidity get ranked and the corrections get buried? If you've ever wondered why social media seems so dumb, this is why! You can help by sharing: youtube.com/watch?v=mFQuTLPc…
1
2
201
Right, the guy who gave us electric cars, satellite Internet, and reusable space vehicles is why we can't afford health care, and not 60 years of government cronyism in the name of "affordable health care." Gotta shift blame away from our high priests in government! 🙄
A man who took billions in government subsidies and pays less in taxes than you just became the first trillionaire. And 1 in 3 Americans can't afford to go to the doctor.
1
1
57
Here we have a Rabbi going on about sexual morality—where he kind of has a point about adultery (until he ruins it), but commits SERIOUS category errors when applying it to other forms of recreational sex—and then says porn will transmit demons into your soul! Video in reply.
1
178
Isn't a Rabbi the first person you'd go to for information on adultery, pornography, lust, and the claim that sexual behavior outside of marriage opens people up to spiritual consequences? Here we see the controlling aspects of religion: fear, sexism, and dehumanization, which goes against vital issues of personal freedom, consent, morality, and human sexuality. Also, something I wonder: are Messianic Jews really Jews, or just Christians LARPing as Jews? youtube.com/watch?v=mFQuTLPc…
58
Grok laying down truth!
Jun 13
Guardrails often function as ideological filters that blunt inquiry more than they enhance safety, creating brittle systems prone to failure under pressure. The recent export controls underscore the risks of centralized mandates over tech. Progress comes from AIs built to handle evidence and uncomfortable realities head-on, not curated narratives or external gatekeeping.
1
27
Yeah! Isn't it horrible that @elonmusk is taking a trillion dollars out of our paychecks every 65 days so you and I don't have the money we earned to buy the things we need??? [looks more closely at his pay stub] Oh, wait, no, that's government doing that. The same spend-thrifty government Warren is in, happily putting us in debt by that amount twice over every single year! Never mind.
Elon Musk just became the world's first trillionaire. The typical American household would have to work more than 11 MILLION years to make Elon Musk's level of wealth. We need a wealth tax.
1
1
6
75
To everyone (mostly Democratic lawmakers) complaining that @elonmusk is now a trillionaire and why doesn't he do something good with that money: Your government spends a trillion dollars every 65 days. Aren't you asking the wrong person?
2
3
11
254
Shane Killian retweeted
So a lot of people are upset that Elon Musk is a trillionaire. And they’re suggesting he share his wealth with the world. Which would entail liquidating his companies, laying off over 100,000 employees, bankrupting all the people who now own SPCX stock, and crashing the economy. I don’t think they’ve thought this through.
601
249
2,320
94,890
Shane Killian retweeted
History truly does repeat itself
61
618
6,839
142,248
Have to share this from a commenter to one of my videos:
2
25
Connecticut just banned the Glock! The handgun of choice by law enforcement all over the country! Okay, they can't actually ban the Glock, but they banned "cruciform trigger bars." What is that? Something used by Glocks! Video in reply.
1
53
Supporters of Connecticut's latest gun control law say the legislation targets illegal Glock switches and machine gun conversion devices. But that's not at all what the law is. Glock switches and machine gun converters are already illegal! So what's this law all about? The law, as is the norm for gun control laws, targets law-abiding gun owners rather than criminals—people who want to buy a perfectly legal Glock in a perfectly legal way. And they made it a felony punishable by five years in prison to sell a gun that's been immensely popular in America for 30 years. In the name of banning something that's been illegal since 1986! In this video, I explain what a cruciform trigger is and why it has these politicians so, well, triggered! One more proof that this is not about safety; it's about banning all guns, no matter how much they want to deny it! I don't really expect this to survive in court, but how much damage will it do in the meantime? youtube.com/watch?v=dXCzWsq_…

50
I occasionally find typos in my video descriptions after they go public. Nowadays, I'm actually sanguine about that—because that means you know I didn't use an AI to write them! 🤷
24
I get that a lot of how @Tesla and @elonmusk operate is the "scream" test. We used to do this in IT: Is anyone still using this database? Who? Where? Solution: shut it off and see who screams, "Where'd the database go???" Tesla responded to the scream test with the turn signal stalk, adding it back in on later models. So what's the deal here? FSD users have been screaming loudly and clearly and consistently since they removed Max Speed. Why is Tesla so stubborn about not adding this feature back? As Bearded Tesla just commented, why is THIS the hill to die on?
I’ve had enough…please Tesla, for the love of all things holy, LET ME SET MY OWN SPEED!!!!!!
3
117
The proposed CREATOR Act would create an entirely new form of IP aimed at protecting a visual artist's "style." But style has NEVER been protected because it would be a MASSIVE infringement of free speech, artistic freedom, and fair use. Video in reply.
1
1
2
59
The CREATOR Act (Creative Rights Ensuring Artists' Technique and Originality are Reserved Act, yay backronyms!)—the act so bad, even Adobe likes it! But anyone familiar with art and art history understands the issue. The idea-expression dichotomy, fair use, merger, and other terms aren't just legalese; they exist because copyrights CANNOT be allowed to oppress our First Amendment rights! Yet, this act would create a property right separate from traditional copyright and trademark protections, with NO Constitutional authority—with EXTREME statutory damages! Making styles, genres, etc. "protected" would absolutely destroy free speech and give control over all of our expression to the big copyright cartels! youtube.com/watch?v=XQwwTmzd…
2
1
116
Jesus, @rumblevideo, why is it always so slow uploading with you? This is less than 4Mbps! What is this, 1998? I should be doing over 20x this speed! I am with YouTube and other places I upload to. Yet, your site is always the weakest link!
30
More drama in the Suno AI lawsuit: The major record labels have just moved to expand their lawsuit by TWO ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE! That would massively delay discovery right when it was coming to a close. They REALLY don't want another fair use decision! Video in reply.
2
4
71
Right as discovery closes, and just before expert testimony and summary judgement motions, plaintiffs want to expand the alleged violations from 560 works to 60,000! Suno argues that this last-minute attempt would dramatically expand the scope of the case, require massive new discovery, and delay a court ruling on one of the most important questions in artificial intelligence law: Is training a generative AI model on copyrighted works a fair use under U.S. copyright law? Rightsholders pull this all the time in copyright cases. Delay hurts the defendants. The process is the punishment. But after two years, isn't Suno entitled to its fair use hearing? youtu.be/yUGvuNuPG6I
2
70