🏴 People can keep trying to gaslight me that 1000 years of eminent English legal scholars are wrong.
They can pretend that a right that was so fundamental that it didn't need to be explicitly detailed for, the most part, somehow doesn't exist.
They can pretend that our freedom to own weapons carte-blanche, which functioned excellently and was respected until 100 years ago, would lead to 'anarchy'.
I'm not buying it.
Bearing arms as an Englishman is like breathing. It doesn't need to be written out as anything more than 'ancient rights and liberties'.
The top legal scholars of the past 1000 years were much more educated than those today. They were right.
No, chaos would not ensue. Any person with a car can commit a massacre right now. We don't ban cars. Every kitchen is full of knives.
No, a government that we pre-date does not have a 'divine right' to violate our native way of life. Nor is to do such legal.
As Anglo-Saxons, we are literally named for the weapons we carried at all times, on our persons, in public.
I have a right to carry a weapon, just like my millions of ancestors, whose blood runs in my veins, carried for thousands of years.
In their name, I tell you this, in short Saxon prose:
A Saxon will have his seax, sooner or later. 🏴
A migrant has no place whatsoever to deprive me, as an Englishman, of my ancestral right to bear arms. 🏴
It's bad enough when Englishmen get this wrong.
If you don't like Englishmen being armed in England, Yusuf, you can leave.