JUST IN🚨 Court Subpoenas the DTCC to Investigate Potential Financial Manipulation and Naked Short Selling - Examination of Failure-to-Deliver (FTD) Data Aims to Uncover Possible Market Irregularities $MMTLP

Peter is the most resilient candidate we've ever seen. We need him in Congress.

$39,000,000,000,000.00 reasons to vote for Peter Pfeifer for Congress in Missouri's 2nd Congressional District. $30,000,000.00 reasons to vote ultra-wealthy @RepAnnWagner out on August 4th. Subscribe and support at pfeiferforcongress.com

Have you heard of #MMTLP? The counterfeiting of American securities has not been resolved. No mission accomplished @POTUS

$MMAT $MMTLP $TRCH $NBH Noting that Michael Leibrock - who was the Managing Director - Chief Systemic Risk Officer at the DTCC at the time of the U3 halt is now the Managing Director - Credit Risk at the Options Clearing Corporation. He worked for Fannie Mae in 2008.

They saw the L2 Data and shit themselves.. but based on your previous post with the last day 12/8 BORROWS of 12 million, this $MMTLP #FinraFraud U3 Halt was PRE-PLANNED via a select few LONG before Dec 8 and L2 data.

MMAT MMTLP TRCH 🚨WHY DOESN’T THE TRUSTEE PURSUE A MOTION TO COMPEL?🤔 ⚠️ Not legal advice - for discussion purposes. A motion to compel usually works best when: •The court knows exactly what is missing. •The producing party (DTCC) has had a chance to explain why it hasn’t produced it. •The judge understands any technical, confidentiality, or protective-order issues. •The moving party can show a clear record of efforts to resolve the dispute. The Trustee is essentially telling Judge Spraker: “We’ve been working on this for over a year, exchanged 40 emails, production is still incomplete, we’re running into statute-of-limitations concerns, and we need the Court involved now.” Then she specifically states one of her goals is: “…set a schedule and parameters for any motion to compel, if necessary.” ⸻ The filing identifies three objectives: 1️⃣ Force DTCC to explain itself The Trustee wants: “concrete information from DTCC about a date by which it will produce the Correspondent Clearing Data” In plain English: “Tell us exactly when we’re getting the data.” ⸻ 2️⃣ Resolve Protective Order Problems The Trustee specifically references: “ECF No. 2601” which is the protective-order framework. That suggests there may still be disagreements regarding: confidentiality designations who can view data how it can be stored how it can be used in litigation A status conference is often faster than filing a lengthy compel motion when the dispute may be procedural rather than outright refusal. ⬅️ ⸻ 3️⃣ Prepare for a Motion to Compel The filing expressly says: “set a schedule and parameters for any motion to compel, if necessary” That tells me the Trustee has not yet concluded DTCC is refusing outright. Instead: Current Position Production incomplete ✔️ Delays occurring ✔️ Missing data identified ✔️ Court intervention needed ✔️ But Not yet at “DTCC has definitively refused to comply.” ⸻ Why This Might Be Strategically Better If the Trustee files a motion to compel today, DTCC could respond: “We’re still producing.” “We’re working through confidentiality issues.” “The Trustee never asked the Court for assistance before filing.” By requesting a status conference first, the Trustee creates a record showing: cooperation patience multiple follow-ups attempts to resolve informally urgency because of limitations concerns That record makes a later motion to compel much stronger. ⸻ ⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰ This paragraph is probably the biggest headline: “Continued delay in DTCC’s production of the Correspondent Clearing Data risks prejudice to the estate, including exposure to statutes-of-limitations constraints on potential litigation…” That is unusually direct. 🎯 The Trustee is essentially telling Judge Spraker: 🚨 “I may have claims to investigate, but I need this DTCC data before limitations periods become a problem.” That is stronger language than we’ve seen in many prior filings. 👀 ⸻ This filing may signal: Near-Term The Trustee wants Judge Spraker to quickly get DTCC and the Trustee’s team in front of him and explain: What has been produced? What remains outstanding? Why is it outstanding? When will it be produced? Next Step If DTCC cannot provide satisfactory answers or a firm production schedule, then a formal Motion to Compel becomes much more likely. In other words: 📌 This filing looks less like an alternative to a motion to compel and more like the Trustee positioning herself to file one with maximum leverage if DTCC still doesn’t deliver. 💥 Not legal advice — just an interpretation of the docket and bankruptcy procedure. ⚖️📄

Americans lose hundreds of billions of dollars to fraud each year. At @USTreasury, we follow the money, and we know financial institutions are often the first to see suspicious activity in real time. They need the tools to act quickly and share information that can help stop fraud before it spreads. Under @POTUS and @VP Vance’s leadership, we will continue targeting fraud wherever it occurs and protecting American taxpayers and consumers. Read more in @FinCENNews’ updated guidance, which we announced today in Houston: home.treasury.gov/news/press…

🤔🤔WHY IS THE DTCC DRAGGING THEIF FEET❓️❓️ So why is the DTCC dragging their feet in the MMAT MMTLP Bankruptcy ❓️ Lets just look at their board of directors, shall we. Citadel Virtu FINRA UBS JP Morgan NYSE Goldman Sachs NOW YOU KNOW WHY THEY DON'T WANT TO SUPPLY THE SUBPOENAED RECORDS‼️