.
@kplikethebird @every brilliantly describes a problem I’ve also encountered: working with AI encourages maddening multitasking. She even gives great tips for dealing with it — but still it’s a losing game.
Over the years, I’ve pretty much read every article, book, and study there is about multitasking and how it undermines your productivity. (I ran a productivity hardware software startup in a previous life.)
There’s a huge cost in switching between tasks paid in fatigue, stress, and time.
The most important facts:
> 3% of people thrive when multitasking, everyone else’s performance suffers.
> The more you multitask, the more you BELIEVE you’re being more productive, but you’re not.
> This effect applies to deep work but also smaller tasks. Even glancing at a notification on your phone is essentially multitasking and costs you. So it’s not just creatives; managers also do much better when they work in 10 or 15 or 20 min. intervals vs. switching every few minutes or seconds.
> There can be a benefit in switching when you’re really stuck with something, but this is much later (hours) than how often most people switch throughout the day (seconds / minutes).
In “It Doesn’t Have to Be Crazy at Work,”
@jasonfried and
@dhh beautifully capture this idea: 1 x 60 doesn’t equal 2 x 30 or 4 x 15 when it comes to work.
Now, why does AI encourage this behavior?
You can give tasks to multiple AI models/agents, and they take time to complete their assignments. You get one started, then the next, and then a 3rd. Then you return to the 1st to check its work, then the 2nd, etc.
Katie compares this to the work of a manager, which is true, but with a big difference: managers usually wait for hours or days to get back results. They don’t have to chunk up their time in seconds or minutes (though many do.)
With AI, the feedback loop is usually minutes. Herein lies the real problem: minutes are too long to wait around and do nothing, but they’re too short to avoid the averse effects of hyper-multitasking.
And so you get what Katie describes: on a good day, you feel productive (but that might still be an illusion, and you still feel worn-out). On other days everything is messy and you feel hangover.
My hope is that this is a temporary problem: AI will get faster and more sophisticated. Most tasks will take seconds, while on the other end of the spectrum, AIs will work on assignments for hours or days.
Those timelines will allow us to go back to a rhythm that fits our human brains: working on one thing at a time, or at least breaking up our tasks in 10 minutes, the minimum chunk that in my experience prevents the worse effects of multitasking.
P.S. I’ll link to two resources below that show the effects of multitasking. One is a brilliant presentation by
@henrikkniberg , the other a simple exercise I recorded in my previous life. You can do it in a few minutes and you’ll experience exactly what happens when you multitask.
--
Katie's article:
every.to/working-overtime/ho…
Henrik's presentation:
youtu.be/Yqi9Gwt-OEA?si=yNMT…
My multitasking test:
youtube.com/watch?v=Xup2ePrj…