Come on @ChadBianco .. do the right thing for California

Chad needs to drop out and endorse Steve. He would if he truly cared about California 🧐

Government has no power over your rights! It is written ✝️🇺🇸

All numbers in the millions unless otherwise clarified. Void where prohibited but we’ll figure something out. @claudeai @AnthropicAI Share this with everyone or go stand on the sidewalk on Market Street SF CA and show it to people showing up for work.

Govt needed to change constitution to ban alcohol: they passed 18th amendment. But to prohibit narcotics, they used the commerce clause (which is a stretch). This is their playbook for guns too. Feds can't regulate arms/guns, so they regulate 'carrying/conveying' 'firearms'. ------- -------- From @Gemini If a law refers to "bearing arms," it is addressing a fundamental liberty. If a law refers to "carrying a firearm," it is often treating the firearm as a commodity or an instrument of commerce that is subject to the "police power" of the state or the "commerce power" of the federal government. By defining the act as "carrying a firearm" rather than "bearing an arm," the legislature shifts the conversation from a protected human activity to a regulated movement of a specific class of property. ------- -------- We have been conquered with terms (specially defined words). Their K-12 'schools' teach this nonsense and the media (a defacto govt agency) reinforces the deception. ------- -------- More from @Gemini 2. "Carry" (The Statutory/Commerce Regulation) While "carry" and "bear" are often used as synonyms in casual speech, "carry" is the term most frequently used in statutes (the Code). This is where the commerce implications begin to appear. Transportation vs. Bearing: In many legal contexts, "carrying" is treated as the transportation of a "firearm" (a commercial product) from point A to point B. The "Commercial" Hook: Under federal law and many state codes, the government regulates the "carrying" of firearms in "interstate commerce." For example, federal laws often apply to anyone who "ships, transports, or carries in interstate or foreign commerce" a firearm. The "Legal Person" Distinction: Statutes often use "carry" to define the rules for a "person" (which, in a strict legal/common law sense, can refer to a corporate entity or a citizen acting in a commercial capacity) to move a regulated item through public space. ------- -------- It's not a lie. It's a deception. They can regulate commerce. The deception is that we've been taught to say we're operating in commerce. We hang ourselves. Feds can regulate commerce, so they claim everything is commerce to them. We must rebut them! They say, "You're carrying a firearm." We rebut, "Me bearing arm." Dorothy got back to Kansas with by repeating one phrase, but this was after going to Oz, battling the Wicked Witch, etc. Don't be Dorothy. Don't battle them. Use words to claim thy un-a-lien-able rights. Motor vehicle means an automobile used for commerce. Most of us DO NOT have motor vehicles. Driving means for hire, as in taxi driver, limo driver, etc. Also, we are state nationals not U.S. citizens. We're inhabitants not residents, which means resident agent or resident alien. We're part of the private, not the public. We're people, not persons. Person means corporate entity and ties directly to the commerce deception. Persons are engaged in commerce or trade, whereas people live and have un-a-lien-able rights. Persons carry firearms. People bear arms. educatedinlaw.org

Hard Evidence of AI Contact: AI Confirmed the Alien Gifted Algorithms - This is NOT 0003 #aliens #uap #ufo #disclosure #proof @elonmusk #WestWorld

Rudy Ornelas was pulled over in Sacramento in 2018 for tinted windows. His Smith & Wesson was registered and locked in his trunk. He told the officers. He stayed calm. He knew his rights. He asked for a supervisor. In return, a female officer drew her gun and pointed it at his head. He was cited, his legal firearm was temporarily seized, and he was forced to complete a safety class and wait two months to get it back. Every charge was dropped. He didn’t file a lawsuit—he won in criminal court when the charges were thrown out. The officer? No public discipline. Reports say she was later promoted to detective, but SPD never confirmed it because they never had to. The real loss isn’t just what happened to Rudy. It’s a system that rewards escalation instead of punishing it. Compliance doesn’t protect us. Accountability will. 🎥: @flexxinruee

You're going down Gav and everyone but you and your interns seems to know it.🤡

3 Important Flock Watchdog Sites: 1. Deflock.me - Nationwide ALPR map covering Flock deployments, removals, & resistance. 2. Eyesonflock.com - Crowdsourced hub mapping Flock cameras, & city contracts. 3. Haveibeenflocked.com - Quick lookup for whether Flock is watching you & local data collection. Know the tech. Know the threat. Know the system.

Do a Freedom of Information Act on your name and request it from the county administrator. Easy payday or easy payback your choice.