👀
This potentially removes one of the biggest structural weaknesses in the V1 thesis... the reliance on wrappers. Historically, wrapped V1s always carried an awkward break in provenance/market continuity. You weren’t interacting directly with the original asset and its native transactional history.
The timing here is also fascinating. At almost the exact same time
@nodefnd is leaning into the idea that “the marketplace is part of the artwork"
@jalilwahdat appears to have found a way to preserve native market continuity around the original V1 contract itself.
This 💯 strengthens the historical and provenance case for V1s in a way that feels conceptually cleaner, more coherent... and MUCH harder to dismiss.
We also can’t ignore the social baggage surrounding the wrapper itself, and the extent to which that likely impacted broader acceptance of V1s.
VERY curious to see how this plays out longer term…