En mi opinión, Trump es Soberanista como Xi, Putin, Modi, Irán, Lula, GCC-Emirs. Sus enemigos mortales son Globalistas: Davos BM/FMI City of London/DeepState. Su coalición incluye a donantes y cuotas de Republicanos con agenda propia y grados de resistencia/coincidencia. Así:

En EUA le llaman liberal-Izquierda a lo que aquí es el "buenaondismo" (marea rosa), y le llaman "conservador" a lo que aquí sería "lo popular/tradicional". La industria de las identidades está impulsando una nueva segmentación por Salud Mental. zerohedge.com/political/new-…

Et Tu, Mike Pompeo? Who Was MI6’s Inside Man Against Donald Trump? youtu.be/4zxX9rUINsM?si=CQJM… a través de @YouTube

Los twits de la Führer buenaondita. El trabajo que esta señora ha hecho para exhibir la descomunal estupidez de la burocracia europea y la total hipocresía y falsedad de su discurso de DDHH y valores, es enorme.

Funded by Joe Biden’s Department of Defense and Hunter Biden’s Rosemont Seneca through Metabiota.

فرمایشات آقای مصطفی خوش چشم در تلویزیون کاملا درست بود. ایران تصمیم داشت در همان ساعات پاسخ محکمی به رژیم اسراییل بدهد که ترامپ بسیار نگران شد و با کمال تعجب بر سر موضوعات باقی مانده و «قفل کننده» در بحث تفاهم فورا کوتاه آمد. حماقت نتانیاهو در بمباران بیروت به ضرر خودش تمام شد.

My long-term followers will know that I’ve argued for years that the FIC is managing a transition away from the MIC-dominated forever war model in the Middle East. You’ll also know how many people told me that could never happen. Trump: FIC good cop. Netanyahu: MIC bad cop. Whether you agree with that framework or not, it’s the lens through which I’ve interpreted events for a long time. The key question was never whether the transition would happen. The question was how it would be managed, who would resist it, and what narrative would be used to sell it. Trump latest narrative won’t surprise my followers.

Putin's envoy Dmitriev: Hunter Biden's front companies FUNDED Ukrainian biolabs, as confirmed by ODNI All of this was revealed by Russia as early as 2022

Yo entiende que hace apenas quince días no era perfectamente evidente para todos, la existencia de los Globalistas Vs los Soberanistas. No era políticamente correcto distinguir que existe una Alianza Soberanista: Trump/Xi/Putin Hoy es imposible no verlo. @BandaDelAzufre

El emisario de la Banca Central y la Corona Británica (la soberanía de Canadá y UK no reside en su pueblo, sino en su Rey), encabeza el Imperio Globalista. Gobernanza de simulación de DDHH al servicio del modelo financierista/FOREVER WAR. Por favor, 4T, no apoyes a esta gente 🙏

Ustedes son muy jóvenes para saberlo, pero esta reunión es de los Globalistas contra Trump. La reunión de las verdaderas potencias fue en China, el mes pasado.

Trump at the G7 Summit in Canada calls out Obama and Trudeau for kicking Russia out of the organization in 2014. All Putin wants is for Russia to be respected and given a seat at the table in what he calls a “multi-polar world”. Instead, the West isolated Russia and turned Ukraine into a NATO proxy to fight Russia. One could argue a soft/cold WW3 started in 2014. That was the moment the CIA/State Dept overthrew and took control of Ukraine, and the West completely isolated Russia. Everything we are witnessing now stems from the catastrophic foreign policy decisions during the Obama regime. FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING.

If you truly understand geopolitics, the Musk - Jack Ma contrast is the best example of how different power structures treat two visionary entrepreneurs. One treats private scaling as the primary engine and subordinates everything else to it. The other treats private scaling as a conditional tool that must remain subordinate to centralized continuity. Two very distinct power architectures. In the US, capital allocators extract fees most efficiently when wealth concentrates upward. Large asset managers and index vehicles earn a percentage of assets under management; the bigger and more concentrated the pools, the higher and more stable the fee income with minimal marginal effort. This logic rewards actors who compound at the top; whether through technology platforms, defense-linked contracts, energy transitions, or satellite infrastructure, while treating broad citizen welfare as a secondary externality rather than a binding constraint. Subsidies, regulatory carve-outs, tax treatment, and procurement flows consistently align with the return profiles of these allocators. The US state does not function as an independent sovereign imposing requirements on society for welfare. Its a platform that clears obstacles for private sector power. When this produces extreme outcomes at the bottom; like record high homelessness, the system registers it as a local governance issue rather than a structural failure requiring reversal of the upward tilt. China operates under the opposite priority. The party-state apparatus retains decisive authority over capital direction, financial architecture, and information flows. China halted Ant Group because Ant was about to load the entire Chinese consumer-credit market onto its own balance sheet; systemic risk dressed up as innovation. Cutting it down wasn't jealousy. It was preventing uncontrolled private autonomy from threatening public affairs. The IPO was halted, the founder was sidelined, and the entity was restructured under tighter supervision. This was not punishment for success per se; it was enforcement of the rule that no private actor may grow large enough to constrain the state’s ability to direct resources toward its own continuity priorities. Visible street homelessness in major Chinese cities remains bare minimal because the state treats housing stability and public order as core legitimacy inputs. Containment, relocation, shelter provision, and suppression of visible disorder are executed as operational requirements, not optional welfare spending. The American pattern therefore produces trillion-scale personal fortunes for those whose activities feed the dominant extraction chains, alongside accelerating visible social costs that the system is structurally reluctant to internalize. The Chinese pattern clips individual compounding when it risks becoming an independent power center, while delivering tighter management of visible disorder. Both outcomes follow directly from which actor holds final authority. And it's not Elon or Jack. It's transnational private capital networks that migrate toward highest returns, or a state apparatus that will not permit private networks to outgrow its control layer.

Aquí en México los medios están alineados a la narrativa de los Globalistas, donde se incepciona la fantasía de un Mundo Basado en Reglas(liberales), donde Trump es "El Imperio"(sic), y es enemigo de Rusia y China. Esto es falso. Trump/Xi/Putin son la Alianza anti-Globlaistas.

There were 120 secret biolabs in 30 different countries. Let that sink in. realclearpolitics.com/video/…

Estos son los Globalistas: burócratas designados por la Corona Británica y la Banca Central de la City of London que administran la UE-UK. Ellos acaban de perder la Tercera Guerra Mundial, que anhelaban desencadenar. El Memorandum de paz EUA-Irán, se apoya en Xi, Putin y Trump.

La Pandemia Covid fue creación de Biolabs, Agencias de Inteligencia y Privados, financiados por USAID. Esto se supo desde 2020 pero se censuró y persiguió a quien lo divulgara. Hoy ha sido demostrado. Sigue sin ser la gran noticia, pero ya quedó para la historia de la humanidad.

El Globalismo Imperial Anglo-Sionista, acaba de perder la Tercera Guerra Mundial, que acaba de ser evitada. Esa es la lectura correcta. x.com/vampablo/status/206655…