Make this viral guys 🙏🙏 What happened to thousands of Chinese Hindus? A hidden story that the world and Chinese media concealed Sorry & RIP to all the Hindus of China 💔

Pravin Anna please ! I am so surprised to see this from you ! Anyways, Annamalai anna has clearly mentioned that, he has already decided to leave the party in the month of December 2025, then why would he contest in the election even if "so called anybody" is offering their seat to him. Even if Annamalai anna did not mention or blame anyone in his video or post, people are so desperate to abuse him. If you really feel somebody is abusing your State leaders, you have all the right to oppose that individual but what is happening right now shows how people were Waiting to abuse Annamalai anna..... So Sad to See TBH.... Important: We criticise a few TN BJP leaders because they openly speak bad about Annamalai anna. Not randomly we do it.

கருஞ்சட்டைகளுக்கு ஒரு மிதி... திருவள்ளுவர் ஒரு #சனாதன_தர்ம வழி வந்த ரிஷி. திருக்குறள் #தமிழ்மறை

Let me tell you a true story about converts & original Christians The Jacobs who stays in my opposite flat with 2 kids always is very cordial they don’t have any problems with our Prasadam, in fact the kids sit with my mom during puja sometimes But Anitha (converted) the nurse who comes to give me Albumin injection even doesn’t take any food in my house😂 Converts think they are bigger than the originals😂😂 But the converts won’t remove their Hîndu names for getting benefits Ask @prakashraaj #JustAsking 😂😂

Shocking and disgraceful attempt to target the sanctity of Dharmasthala. Prakash Raj frequently lectures others on morality and democracy, but Chinnayya has further alleged that actor Prakash Raj spent ₹200 crore (from Kerala ) to spread false propaganda against Dharmasthala The truth must come out, and if proven guilty, no amount of celebrity status should shield him from the heat of the law.

👍👏👌 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

#justasking @prakashraaj Do you have any shame?? Will you do such nasy things for filling your plate??

☄️☄️☄️Education Mjnister Rajmohan of Tamil Nadu is such an uneducated person - he is violating Articles 15 to 25 regarding freedom of religion and practice -This is interference in the Fundamental Rights of Indian citizens.☄️☄️☄️ "We have said that no one should enter educational campuses with identities related to religion or caste. No one—even if it's just a small thread. Even if a thread is tied at my house, when I leave the house, I remove it and then come." Right Side (Reaction - Dr. Rajkumar): ​"This is an injustice, an absurdity. When you speak just because he said so, look, I have taken out my Karungali (ebony bead necklace) from my neck. Each person can wear whatever they want, even a bone, and no one can say anything. ​If you look at it, these are Fundamental Rights. Go ask Minister Rajmohan to read our wonderful Constitution of India and understand Fundamental Rights. There are Articles 15 to 25 regarding freedom of religion. Every human being, in any manner—whether by wearing a pottu (bindi), applying sandalwood paste, wearing a thread, wearing a cap, or keeping a beard—can practice and show their religion to the world. It is written there: 'to preach, practice, and profess his own religion'. That is a very vital Fundamental Right. If Minister Rajmohan asks his legal team, they will tell him. This is a massive violation of Fundamental Rights, number one. ​Number two, even regarding Justice Chandru's [recommendations], it was not a judicial order. It was just a recommendation. He is saying it as a suggestion that it would be good if everyone went along without these symbols. Poor Thiruvalluvar—they took away his holy ash, then his saffron robes, then his sacred thread... they are doing the same to everyone now. So, that was only a recommendation. ​Thirdly, you absolutely cannot say that this should be brought in as a rule. No one has the right to say that. This same Minister Rajmohan—I think all religions are one and I live genuinely and secularly in my heart—but these same people, can they tell Christians: 'Don't come wearing a cross because it shows you are different'? Can you tell Muslims: 'Don't wear a cap, or come without a mustache but keeping a beard'? Why? Those who follow Guru Gobind Singh or Guru Nanak, next they won't be able to wear anything? Can you tell them not to wear a Mundas (turban)? ​This is interference in the Fundamental Rights of Indian citizens. I am a big fan [of the government/party], I am with the BJP, and I see that he is trying to do good. But when mistakes like this happen, we cannot let them live like a king who has no one to correct him. We must point it out. If it goes beyond this, we will even hold a massive condemnation protest. ​Let me make one final point. In Turkey—you can all Google this—when a rule was brought in that women should not wear the hijab, many women committed suicide because they couldn't express their faith. A massive furor happened, and it ended everything. Minister Rajmohan, whether suicides happen or people attempt it, it will be a huge downfall for you. Please change this stance. I am telling you this firmly."

Urdu School - at the cost of 3.24 crore !! Muslins can study urdu - which is an additional language apart from English & Tamil - Three language allowed for them !!! Urdu is similar to Hindi When Mujilims can study Urdu Why denying Hindi or another language as 3rd language to rest of the population? Is this your stance on following 2 language system?? DMK continued ..

Iranian who escaped Sharia law warns the West: "I'm Iranian. I went to prison under Islamic law. I know how it starts… and it always starts with the Left uniting with Islamists. I came to Canada for freedom. now I’m watching the exact same pattern. They appease. Weakness invites more. They will never stop." This man lived it. The West is sleepwalking into the same nightmare.

Un cristiano copto egipcio explica cómo Egipto se convirtió al islam: "Somos uno de los primeros cristianos del mundo. El islam se impuso por la espada. Mataron a los hombres, violaron a las mujeres y esclavizaron a los niños. Egipto pasó del 0% al 90% de musulmanes. El Islam es un culto al sexo, la perversión y la violencia."

Yesterday, in a prayerful mood, I visited the 800-year-old Sri Santhana Venugopala Swamy Temple at Mahadevpura near Bibinagar, a temple dating back to the Kakatiya era. To my surprise, a Mazar has appeared under the sacred Ashwatha (Banyan) tree around which devotees traditionally perform pradakshina as part of temple worship. How and why was a Mazar established inside a Hindu temple campus, beneath one of its most sacred trees? Was this done with the knowledge and consent of the temple authorities and devotees, or was it an overnight encroachment? These are questions that deserve clear answers.

Nation 🇮🇳 or Religion 🕉 ? My religion says "Nation is first" 🔥

🚨🔥 UN ÁRABE DE KUWAIT DESTRUYE EL DISCURSO PALESTINO DE LA ONU EN LA ONU‼️ Jasem Aljuraid, periodista kuwaití: “Señor Presidente, He oído el término «colonizadores». Pero, ¿quiénes son los verdaderos colonizadores? Un reino judío gobernó Judea durante mil años. Nosotros, los árabes, nos apoderamos de esta tierra. ¿Quién arabizó a los egipcios, fenicios, persas y amazighs? Fuimos nosotros, los árabes. ¿Por qué, entonces, el consejo consagra una mentira al mantener un punto permanente en la agenda sobre Palestina, mientras ignora el regreso a casa del corazón indígena de Israel? Seamos claros sobre quién defiende realmente nuestra soberanía. Hoy, Israel lucha por la paz, liberando a Gaza de los terroristas de Hamás y protegiendo a los iraníes de la República Islámica. Lo que Israel está haciendo con la Guardia Revolucionaria Islámica —impidiendo que un régimen genocida adquiera armas nucleares— es un regalo para la humanidad. Existen 57 países islámicos y un único estado judío, Israel. A pesar del odio constante que se busca eliminarlo, Israel no solo ha sobrevivido, sino que ha prosperado. No creo en los milagros, pero este es uno de ellos. Así que le pregunto a la ONU: ¿cuándo pondrán fin al ritual de condenar a Israel? ¿No es hora, en cambio, de aprender de Israel? De cómo derrotar al terrorismo, defender las sociedades libres y buscar la paz. Gracias."

Put this reel under every anti India post by Americans

Deep State.?

A French moto vlogger "Frenchy" was traveling through India on his bike, He had a lump on his neck. Curious about the cost and process to remove it, he inquired locally and was quoted just $500 for the treatment. Stunned by both the price and the short waiting time, he went ahead with the procedure. Within a week, the lump was removed. He documented the whole journey on camera. He later shared that the same type of surgery in Australia after an accident had cost him $12,000. If manufactured online hate and negative perceptions in the West didn’t exist, India could easily be earning hundreds of billions of dollars every year from medical tourism alone. And this is why India needs to fight bad image/perception, that is being promoted by India's adversaries.

True @svembu ji. That’s exactly why we built our #TamilAi, without depending on foreign pre-trained models. The foundational model is ready. It is ready for launch. It’s a 100% indigenous LLM 😎. We are building it from scratch. India now has its own foundational model. @DeffoTechPvtLtd #aatmanirbhar #indiaAi #Aimission @narendramodi @AshwiniVaishnaw

The Unholy Prophet The story of Muhammad and Zaynab bint Jahsh presents one of the most troubling ethical episodes recorded in the Islamic sources. Zaynab was not just any woman—she was the wife of Zayd ibn Harithah, Muhammad’s adopted son, making her his daughter-in-law by social and familial convention. The Qur’an itself preserves the moment of tension and concealment: “And [remember] when you said to the one upon whom Allah had bestowed favor and you had bestowed favor, ‘Keep your wife and fear Allah,’ while you concealed within yourself that which Allah was to disclose, and you feared the people, while Allah has more right that you fear Him. So when Zayd had no longer any need for her, We married her to you…” (Qur’an 33:37) This verse openly admits that Muhammad was concealing something in his heart concerning Zaynab—something he did not wish people to know. The verse then resolves the situation by declaring that Allah Himself married Zaynab to Muhammad after Zayd divorced her. In effect, the revelation removes the social taboo and retroactively legitimizes the marriage. The early classical commentator al-Tabari (d. 923), one of Islam’s most respected historians and exegetes, records the uncomfortable backstory. He writes: “The Messenger of Allah went out looking for Zayd. He came to his house, and Zaynab stood up for him. She was wearing a garment and exposed part of her beauty. The Messenger of Allah turned away, saying, ‘Glory be to Allah, who causes hearts to turn.’ When Zayd heard this, he understood and later came to the Prophet and said, ‘Messenger of Allah, I wish to divorce her.’” — al-Tabari, Jāmiʿ al-bayān, commentary on Qur’an 33:37 This report is deeply revealing. Muhammad’s admiration for Zaynab’s beauty was obvious enough that Zayd himself inferred his leader’s desire and offered to divorce her. Muhammad initially told Zayd to keep his wife—but the Qur’an later admits that Muhammad was concealing his true feelings while fearing public criticism. The ethical implications are profound. The sequence appears to show: • A leader developing desire for his adopted son’s wife • The adopted son divorcing her after perceiving that desire • A divine revelation emerging afterward to legitimize the marriage • The abolition of adoption-based familial barriers to remove the stigma (Qur’an 33:4–5, 33:37) The revelation conveniently resolves Muhammad’s personal predicament while simultaneously establishing a new legal precedent. From a critical historical perspective, this raises serious questions about the relationship between personal desire and prophetic authority. Rather than rebuking Muhammad, the Qur’an defends him and elevates the marriage to divine ordinance. The result is not merely a personal union but a theological justification embedded permanently within Islamic scripture. Even within Islam’s own earliest and most authoritative sources, the narrative reflects a moment where human desire, social taboo, and claimed divine revelation intersect in a way that continues to provoke scrutiny and ethical concern.