The Hillsborough tragedy happened 1 year & 2 days before Robbie's grossly negligent death. The Legacy of 'Hillsborough Law' belongs to the Hillsborough Families. However, the Legacy of a Legal Duty of Candour belongs to 10 year old Robbie Powell whose death exposed its absence.

Pls RT: I agree 100% & thank you for your comments. You may be interested in reading the following articles which you may find supports my serious allegations of an ongoing 36yr NHS and State cover up: university.open.ac.uk/resear… university.open.ac.uk/resear… robbieslaw.com

Pls RT: Below is the link to the December 1994 Guardian article, by Nick Davies, that Dr Dewi Evans read before supporting the medical care that was provided by his GP associates in the last 15 days of Robbie's life. medicinegovorgmedlearninnova… See attached GP & police letters!

I reported serious crimes to Dyfed Powys Police & CPS Wales in 1994 with this document and exhibits: medicinegovorgmedlearninnova… Evidence was ignored for 6yrs during 2 crim investigations. 3rd indep investigation set out 35 suggested charges. CPS York=sufficient evidence=no charges!

Before sending the letter supporting the care of the GPs Dewi Evans had read a 1994 Guardian article exposing GPs' lies & forgeries. He also had Robbie's hospital records informing the GPs of the suspicion of Addison's disease, need for the ACTH test & the need for referral😔

Pls RT: Dear @DOckendenLtd, I noted with interest your comments on Panorama 1/6/26 about bereaved parents not being told the truth about the deaths of their babies. Why was there no mention of the breaches of the Legal Duty of Candour for NHS Organisations or CQC's response? 😔

Absolute respect for your unending fight for justice for Robbie and hope that you will find justice and an acknowledgement of the failings of the time, and by Dr Evans who should have supported you highlighting the terrible errors.

Dewi Evans, "star witness" & expert of the #LucyLetby trial wrote a letter to the GPs saying they'd done nothing wrong. Later denying he knew anything of the case...

Important Message! My X account was hacked last week - I apologise for any inconvenience. I've just regained access. Kind regards. Will

I don’t usually post things like this, but it’s only fair to give credit to my coach. Yesterday I made a withdrawal from my crypto profits, and today I was able to purchase a car quite remarkable. Grateful for the progress, thanks to @NikolinaSabljc for the guidance.

So glad this is finally public so I can comment on it openly. I have seen a fair number of HR investigations over the years. In my experience, whistleblowers are often formally investigated before they are pushed out, or as a way of “teaching a lesson” to anyone who challenges the status quo. This is actually one of the most competent internal investigation reports I have seen. What surprised me most was the outcome. Usually, management plays an active role in managing out people who raise concerns - such as Lucy, who was clearly DATIXing poor standards and practices within the neonatal unit. Dr Brearey and Dr Jayaram were in management positions at the time and therefore carried responsibility for patient safety and culture within the department. So that would have been a pretty major motivator to want her out if she was shining the spotlight on their managerial/leadership failures. Lucy Letby was never going to be safe returning to a workplace where she was clearly being bullied by a group of colleagues (most of whom were consultants and thus in a position of power over her) unless individual accountability followed. At the very least, that should have meant formal warnings, apologies to Lucy, and mediated discussions. Management could have supported her with a temporary redeployment to another clinical unit so she could continue practising while matters were resolved. Clinical work was clearly what Lucy wanted to continue doing. Some people in these situations , where redeployment is necessary during HR investigations, choose to remain in management or leadership roles instead, but that wasn't what Lucy wanted. So in essence the hospital made a strong start with doing a competent HR investigation - but by failing to follow through properly, the situation escalated to the point where consultants went to the police. What nobody seems willing to ask is this: if the consultants genuinely believed Lucy was murdering babies, why did they only go to the police after they were found to have bullied her? If you truly believed a nurse was a serial killer, is it reasonable to accept that a consultant would really think that internal Trust procedures were an appropriate way to deal with it? UK trained consultants are NOT politically naïve. Consultant appointments are highly political positions, and consultants understand very well how NHS systems actually work. It stretches credibility, and that's a generous description, to claim the consultants genuinely believed reporting concerns over a serial killer internally was what they thought was the right thing to do. If they truly thought Letby was such a prolific killer, were they not concerned she might harm children outside work as well? This entire case is a national disgrace, and I suspect it will remain in history as one of the most consequential modern witch hunts in British healthcare. Witch hunts within the NHS are unfortunately, however, very common - often carried out through internal employment procedures or GMC processes. But turning that common dynamic (whose root cause is toxic leadership practices) into the conviction of a serial killer is something else entirely. An extraordinary outcome, enabled by a broken medical "expert" system and sealed by an inadequate police investigation and criminal justice system. What a world we live in. I hope everyone involved in this MoJ - or anyone who knew what was happening and could have helped but chose not to - gets what they deserve. @LucyLetbyTrials @drphilhammond @PrivateEyeNews @NadineDorries @ClarkeMicah @peter__duffy @MartynPitman @willcpowell @DavidDavisMP @DavidRoseUK @PeterElston1 @Michelehal7344 @Voice4theDead @reasonoverfear @Oversig58651516 @Seagreen2707 @RexvsLucyLetby

The Hillsborough tragedy happened 1 year & 2 days before Robbie's grossly negligent death. The Legacy of 'Hillsborough Law' belongs to the Hillsborough Families. However, the Legacy of a Legal Duty of Candour belongs to 10 year old Robbie Powell whose death exposed its absence.

30 years and still not acknowledged or addressed.

Not only should this be adopted in England & Wales but in Scotland too.

No real duty of candour until very recently. Please look at Will Powell (father of Robbie) and connect. He has fought for duty of candour for decades since little Robbie died. @willcpowell

Have a look and a hello with @willcpowell over his decades long campaign for a duty of candour and beautiful Robbie’s treatment.

Ombudsman being 'Independent' of justice & scrutiny of failure

It is heartbreaking to watch the new ones learning how it all works. Crushing. Thanks for trying to prevent it for decades.