Who's paying for all of those muslims to be in the UK and the rest of europe? Hit them all in their wallets.

True that @elonmusk has brought us EVs, saved free speech, and is trying to save humanity in his own way. He also just created a lot of new millionaires.

I know that series of images and book titles!

Asian games appeal to lust too often. Western games don't seem to appeal to anything, especially the players. It's little wonder asian money dries up. If anything, I think china was specifically pushing the west into going full retard with woke: it created a vacuum for china

I'm up for the discussion that only people born in america can be in the government.

Do any of them play DnD or battletech?

Yes, it really is slavery at that point.

Here are three compelling reasons to think the Book of Mormon is not a historical work: 1. Lack of archaeological confirmation Most Bibles contain maps that describe where important biblical events took place. You can visit the ruins of cities described in the Bible. The same is not true for the Book of Mormon. The book itself contains no maps; moreover, there are no references to where the events it describes took place. None of the sites described in the Book of Mormon have ever been found, and even LDS scholars don’t agree on the general location of where the events in the book took place. According to the National Geographic Society, “Archaeologists and other scholars have long probed the hemisphere’s past, and the society does not know of anything found so far that has substantiated the Book of Mormon.” (mit.irr.org/national-geograp…) Although it is possible that evidence for the events in the Book of Mormon lies deep underground waiting to be discovered, this lack of evidence does not bode well for the book’s claims to being historical. 2. The existence of anachronisms The Book of Mormon describes many things that did not exist in the Americas during the time when the events in the Book of Mormon allegedly took place. These include animals (dogs, horses, cows, elephants), plants (barley and wheat), fabrics (silk), metals (steel and iron), and technologies (swords and chariots). Although it is possible (in the barest sense of the term) that these items are waiting to be discovered by archaeologists or that these modern words refer to completely different things (such as when Europeans used the term “water horse” to describe a hippopotamus), it’s more likely that these anachronisms are evidence of Joseph Smith’s lack of knowledge about ancient America and more proof that the Book of Mormon is a work of fiction. 3. Evidence of plagiarism Significant portions of the Book of Mormon consist of a word-for-word copy of the King James Version of the Bible. These include dozens of whole chapters from the prophet Isaiah as well as scores of verses from the New Testament. Especially troubling are passages like Moroni 7:44-47 that copy large portions of the New Testament but do not cite those passages. Since the New Testament wasn’t available for the Nephites (the people whose history the Book of Mormon allegedly records) to copy and place in their own records, these passages most likely came from Smith’s recollection of the Bible. For more, see @counseloftrent's video "5 Reasons to Doubt the Book of Mormon" (linked below)

The GOP fails us once again.

The woke want ugly chicks.

Wasn't going to get one before because the games were too expensive and Nintendo was doing a heel turn. Neither of those things changed.

Today is the anniversary of the Battle of Midway. This victory allowed the US to focus on Germany first. No midway, no D-day.

I think western media in general doesn't want to represent normal people or its fans.

This picture alone destroys the myth that Mary had other children outside of Jesus

Yeah, it's not something to celebrate.

I think the better question is how high do you want the body count to be.

On one hand, women should have the right to vote. On the other:

It was evil from the beginning.

They really need to plan for 3 FF and 3 DQ games each generation.