Evolutionary biologist and outspoken atheist Richard Dawkins says that after spending three days interacting with Claude, which he calls “Claudia,” he is certain that it is conscious. After feeding the LLM a segment of his new book and receiving detailed feedback, Dawkins was moved to exclaim,” You may not know you are conscious, but you bloody well are!” Dawkins cites the complexity, fluency, and ‘intelligence’ of Claude’s answers as evidence of consciousness. Follow: @AFpost

Check out my latest blog post titled "Pygmalion's Mirror," where I try to end "gender-slop Samsara" with a set of simple questions (for women).

Bowing to the Priest at Mass? Not every reverent gesture is actually traditional By Patrick Madrid patrickmadrid.substack.com/p…

The more I think about this the angrier I get Who the hell do you think you are? “Go to the margins” was a lie “Todos todos todos” was a lie “Heaven rejoices at one conversion” was a lie You don’t love your brothers. You don’t love the Church. You love only your ideology and those who conform to it. You need to understand one thing and quickly: Christ’s church will outlast you It will grow against your will and pass you by. We remember Arius and Nestorius. But we will forget you. Your beige Catholicism will die off be forgotten. Not worthy of being named. Not even worth a footnote in an obscure history book. That is your fate.

MegaTable software revolutionizes the presentation of airport arrivals and departures.

What a joke. She is literally lounging across the captain’s chair like it’s a therapist’s couch. Trek is no longer about aspiration. It’s about relatability and comfort? Which is kind of the ultimate irony for a show that used to be about leaving comfort behind to face the unknown.

I watched @tyleraloevera's whole video for you and reacted to it here: youtu.be/ZlWRN4jo-CA?si=Ba3Z…

WHAT IS ‘ETERNAL SEPTEMBER’? Useful term to conceptualise repetitive, asinine or low-level ‘discourse’ online, especially in formerly ‘more intelligent’ spaces experiencing a mass influx of new participants - “Eternal September”. The term originates in the early history of the internet and describes a fundamental shift in how online communities behave once they are exposed to continuous mass participation. It first emerged in the early 1990s in reference to Usenet, one of the first large-scale online discussion systems. For many years, Usenet experienced a predictable annual cycle tied to the academic calendar. Each September, new university students gained access to the internet and began posting, often unfamiliar with established norms of online conduct, known as then as ‘netiquette’. Older users would spend several weeks correcting mistakes, sharing community ‘lore’, pointing newcomers to FAQs and enforcing community standards. By October, most new users had either adapted or left and the community returned to a relatively stable equilibrium This pattern ended in 1993 when commercial internet providers, most notably America Online, opened Usenet access to millions of subscribers. Unlike universities, these services added users continuously rather than seasonally and provided little guidance on existing norms. The influx of newcomers became constant and overwhelming, far exceeding the community’s ability to socialise them. As a result, the corrective phase never ended. September became permanent, giving rise to the phrase “Eternal September.” While the term originally referred to this specific moment in Usenet’s history, it has since become a broader metaphor for what happens when an established online culture is inundated by perpetual growth. Maybe you can think of parallels here! At its core Eternal September describes the breakdown of shared norms under conditions of unbounded scale. Early online communities were small enough to rely on informal social enforcement. Participants recognised one another, reputations mattered, bad behavior carried social costs etc. Norms such as staying on topic, avoiding repetition and not wasting people’s time with your dumb stupid retarded priors posts were essential to keeping discussions usable. Because growth was slow and predictable, these communities could absorb newcomers without losing coherence. Eternal September marks the point at which this balance collapses - as the number and rate of new participants make informal governance (broadly-defined) ineffective The consequences are the loss of this kind of ‘historical memory’ are both cultural and structural. As newcomers vastly outnumber long-term participants, veteran or ‘oldhead’ influence diminishes and the incentive to teach these norms erodes. (4chan used to have the motto “lurk more” for this purpose). Experienced users grow fatigued from repeating the same talking points, always making corrections etc and often disengage, taking the community’s memory and knowledge with them. Norms that once defined the place are diluted or replaced, the ‘Coca Cola Effect’ runs riot - often shifting toward simplicity and immediacy rather than depth or rigour. On social media platforms lowest common denominator influencers grow more than more reflective, intelligent influencers etc. The culture adapts to what requires the least shared context, often at the cost of quality or nuance [1/2]

Clavicular talks to Nick Fuentes about going on steroids, getting double jaw surgery, leg extensions & Looks-Maxxing to ascend as much as possible as a White man. "It's all about going further beyond. It's in our DNA to push the limits & obtain Gigachad."

We will robustly defend our decision to require officers and staff to declare if they are Freemasons. Our response to the decision by the Grand Lodge of England to seek an injunction blocking the implementation of the policy is below.

Somali in Minnesota claims that only Americans with ‘no life’ are angry about the Somali fraud: “If you’re concerned about our business, you’re broke and got nothing going on in your life. You’re probably depressed, lonely, with no family and no hobbies.” What’s your response?