Also with respect, the “spirituality of the church” doesn’t mean pastors and/or the church must be silent wherever politics is in view. Instead, it limits institutional church power, not the scope of pastors and theologians rightful jurisdiction to teach the whole counsel of God to all peoples.
It’s true that WCF 31.4 says courts must not “intermeddle” in civil affairs as civil actors, but it still allows for humble petition and advice. This is a jurisdictional boundary for ecclesiastical courts that also allows for exceptions, not a pastoral or prophetic boundary that limits what pastors and theologians can teach regarding political theology and the just role and limitations of the state.
Of course, the spirituality of the church is also largely about its means. Word and sacrament. This, however, doesn’t limit what subjects the Word can be applied to.
Now, once we acknowledge that ministers can preach what is just or unjust in war, economics, abortion, sexuality, or race, you’ve already conceded they may speak to the political.
The spirituality of the church teaches that there is a difference between,
1. Declaring God’s moral law and how it applies to all persons and places according to their role, regardless if that role is political
2. Turning specific policy blueprints into binding ecclesiastical tests.
IMHO, this Wolfean sort of 2K theology collapses (1) into (2) and is not representative of how the church has historically taught or applied the spirituality of the church. Ultimately, it proves far too much and undercuts the legitimate role of the minister to teach all of God’s Word to all people.
With all due respect, isn’t the question of how magistrates will prudentially apply the natural law in their respective domains really a political question and therefore beyond the scope of pastors and theologians?
Or, to put it another way, when its officers say the civil magistrate can’t enforce the 1T or the 10c (because they can’t imagine any just way of doing it), is the church circumventing the work of politics, rendering a political verdict itself, and therefore violating the spirituality of the church?