ARE YOU A PARENT OF CHILDREN WHO PLAY ON 3G FOOTBALL PITCHES? Both girls and boys are at risk. If so, then please read this. It could save you and your family a lot of heartache. So many years have gone by and we're now under a new government, but absolutely nothing has changed. It seems that no-one in charge in all the organisations involved actually care about the youngsters who are exposed to the toxic chemicals in the rubber crumb infill in these money-making pitches. I now have a very long list of children who have cancer, mainly academy goalkeepers, some have lost a leg or their lives and absolutely NO-ONE in charge cares. They held meetings and decided that it wasn't in the public interest to disclose the cancer risks!!! ALL these organisations are responsible for every child who gets cancer after playing on these toxic pitches. But they're raking in the many £$Billions and that is more important than the health and lives of the children who play on these pitches! Unfortunately, very few media outlets are interested in publicising this so parents are unaware of the cancer risks. But cancer isn't the only health issue, other chemicals change your DNA for all future generations, shrink genitalia, damage sperm, affect male and female fertility, and, if pregnant, cross the placenta and harm the brains of unborn babies. More and more girls and young women are encouraged to play on these toxic pitches and they're completely unaware of these risks, especially important if they're pregnant or planning to get pregnant. One day, public knowledge about this will become widespread and NO organisation involved can pretend that they don't know about the health issues, particularly the cancer risks, and the parents of the affected children will start litigation, as is already happening in the US. researchgate.net/publication… . telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/06… . cambs.police.uk/news/cambrid… . nationalworld.com/sport/foot… . crewealex.net/news/2021/apri… . theoldhamtimes.co.uk/news/24… .

The England Amputee Football Team need £50,000 to be able to play in the Amputee World Cup... please help if you're able to. There must be some professional footballers out there with a few spare £££... your contributions would make such a difference to this team. PLEASE HELP THEM .

The England Amputee Football Team need help ... they would like to play in the Amputee World Cup but they need £50,000 ... can you help them? I hope so, otherwise they won't be able to play in the Amputee World Cup. The FA does not fund them... itv.com/watch/news/catch-up-… via @ITVX

On ITV News Anglia (West) Sunday 14th June The England Amputee Football Team itv.com/watch/news/catch-up-… via @ITVX The England Amputee Football Team are looking for funding, just £50,000, so that they can participate in the Amputee World Cup in November. amputeefootball.org/2026/02/… For some reason, they are not funded by the FA... Surely, there are professional footballers who can help contribute so that this team can compete? Some are still recovering from cancer... so come on all you football fans, please get your chequebooks out and help our amputee footballers achieve their dreams... thank you. theeafa.org/ .

Please share Matt's tweets above ⬆️ EIRs are in: APPG, Seahorse, payments and conflict checks. 💧🚨 @H2ODraganSavic @premnsikka @leanahosea @MichaelWestBiz @FloodexUK @Against_3G @DamianHastie @crimlawuk @natalieben @rosemarywa

Michael Gove - editor of the Spectator, Orwell Prize judge & overseer of the biggest electoral fraud in modern UK history - apparently upset that I called out his boss’s investment in Palantir after he ran a sycophantic pro-Palantir piece

Captain John Hoyte @JohnHoytePilot has an interview with @SoniaPoulton this Monday morning. Sonia, this post has reached 672k people in just a few days. The public clearly wants this story told. John has spent 20 years trying to get mainstream journalists to investigate this properly. The evidence is in the House of Lords record. It has been tested in court. France has recognised aerotoxic syndrome as an occupational disease. America's largest injury firm is now taking mass cases. The interest is there. The evidence is there. What has been missing is the coverage. If you have shared this post already, please share it again. John is 70 years old and has been fighting this for two decades. Every person who flies on a bleed air aircraft is exposed to this risk. That is almost every commercial flight in the world. This is not going away. Keep pushing it. @JohnCleese @premnsikka @johnmcdonnellMP @MLorrM @Wftproof @nw_nicholas @Victoria_Rixon

“It’s insane, we have a rogue US military contractor handling our most sensitive data. Palantir has a contract running our nuclear missile program. We have no national security.” Palantir. IT'S WORSE Than You Think @carolecadwalla

13/6/26. UK. Fast-track’ regulation could expose people to harmful chemicals, say campaigners. ‘Fighting Dirty’ is taking legal action against government over proposal it says could import weaker standards on chemical hazard classifications into UK law. theguardian.com/environment/…

NHS MANAGERS HID 100,000 PATIENT SCANS IN CAR BOOTS One hundred thousand patients. One hundred thousand people went to hospital, trusted the NHS with their bodies, had X-rays and scans taken, and were never told what those scans showed. Some of those images showed cancer. Some showed serious illness that needed urgent treatment. The films sat in corridors and store rooms, rotting and unchecked, for years. Nobody looked at them. Nobody picked up the phone. Nobody told a single patient. This happened. At the Royal London Hospital. In the heart of London. In the 21st century. When health inspectors were due to arrive and see the chaos for themselves, managers locked the backlog in a storeroom so it would stay hidden. Consultants physically stuffed patient X-ray films into their car boots to keep them out of sight during official visits. The inspection came and went. The tick boxes were filled in. The patients stayed in the dark. Dr Otto Chan was a consultant radiologist at the hospital. A decorated, respected, senior doctor with 23 years of service. He found this scandal and he refused to stay quiet. He reported the hidden scans. He flagged that junior doctors were being pushed to perform procedures they had never been trained for, unsupervised, on real patients. He went to the British Medical Association. He went to the medical press. He did every single thing the system tells you to do. Barts and The London NHS Trust @NHSBartsHealth responded by sacking him for gross misconduct in June 2006. At the employment tribunal, the Trust did not apologise. They did not express concern for the 100,000 patients left in the dark. They told the judge that Dr Chan was not a whistleblower at all. He was a troublemaker running a campaign to damage the organisation. His concerns were pure fantasy. That was the official position of an NHS Trust about a man who found 100,000 unread patient scans hidden in a car boot. Half of those scans were never reviewed by a specialist. Ever. Those patients, and their GPs, will go to their graves not knowing what was on those films. Nobody was prosecuted. Nobody was struck off. The people who hid the evidence kept their jobs. The doctor who found it lost his. SOURCES: @guardian @NHSBartsHealth @EastLondonLines

HUGE WIN: Union Township has officially banned data centers! The decision stands in sharp contrast to neighboring Kenilworth's proposed 250 MW hyperscale Al data center, a project expected to receive hundreds of millions of dollars in state tax incentives.

Are your children still playing on this toxic rubbish? .

Good news! Ministers have finally given green light to new #NaturalHistory GCSE. Big hats off to tireless advocate Mary Colwell 🙌 Now young people will be able to get to know & love the natural world & gain vital skills to protect it @curlewcalls🌷🌳 🦅🦡 theguardian.com/education/20…

This really worries me A month ago in Wales I suffered a ruptured aneurysm in my abdomen. I lost over 2 units of blood But the Welsh ambulance service refused to send an ambulance. I was still breathing so apparently didn't need one I spent 7 hours lying on the ground in a car park. Every time I moved I threw up from the pain. The owners of the car park called 999 6x One of the people there was a fireman. He couldn't believe that 999 treated each call as a separate incident and couldn't see the details or link to previous calls. He was frustrated because they could see I was seriously ill but you can't see internal bleeding and so there was no way to persuade 999 that it actually was an emergency Eventually my husband arrived by taxi, journey of more than 3 hours from our home He gave me my pain meds (the car park people were worried about liability and I was too ill to get them myself). This meant I was able to crawl into the car and he drove me to A&E He got me into a wheelchair. We waited 75 minutes to see a doctor. I was shivering, heaped with blankets and threw up all over the floor As soon as a doctor looked at me I was taken straight to resus. The next day I was transfered by blue light ambulance to another hospital, had a blood transfusion and spent 5 days on the high dependency unit If my husband hadn't been able to come and look after me I have no idea how I would have survived. As it was I nearly didn't I would not have been able to get myself to hospital nor would I have been able to log into some digital triage system This scheme seems to assume if you're seriously ill you'll arrive by ambulance and if not you're well enough to navigate a digital portal My experience suggests that's a dangerous assumption A week later, back home in England I had another ruptured aneurysm. This time an ambulance came in 2 hours and again I was taken straight to resus It wasn't the same because I had a recent diagnosis of a ruptured aneurysm so we could tell 999 I was almost certainly bleeding internally. But I was too ill to get myself down the stairs and out to the car. We still needed that ambulance and I still wouldn't have been able to fiddle around with an ipad Proper triage REQUIRES an actual doctor to look at the patient. It takes a matter of minutes to differentiate between a life threatening emergency and not a life threatening emergency. That's not minutes to get a diagnosis but to know that the person is stable or not stable and if not that needs immediate attention Seriously ill people can't do it themselves. It doesn't matter how smart or articulate they are normally. Or how tough. Expecting people to manage their own emergency care isn't what a modern health service should do telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/06…

Enjoy your football ... but KEEP OFF 3G pitches please. .