It’s wild how they suddenly remember all these other uses for money when it comes to ending a war, but not when the Pentagon requests a $1.5 trillion annual budget.

Who controls the media? Updated list. Meta owns: Facebook Instagram WhatsApp Messenger Threads Oculus Meta AI Meta is controlled by Mark Zuckerberg who is jewish Alphabet owns: Google YouTube Android Gmail Chrome Pixel phones Nest smart home devices Fitbit DeepMind Gemini AI Waymo self-driving cars Verily Calico Wing drone delivery Alphabet is controlled by Larry Page and Sergey Brin who are both jewish Tic Tok U.S. algorithm and infrastructure is controlled by Oracle Oracle is controlled by Larry Ellison who is jewish -Hookup Apps Match Group owns: Tinder Hinge OkCupid Match. com Plenty of Fish Meetic The League BLK Archer OurTime Was founded by Barry Diller who is jewish Grindr Was founded by Joel Simkhai who is jewish Bumble Was founded by Whitney Wolfe Herd who is jewish -Porn Onlyfans Owned by Leonid Radvinsky who is jewish Vixen Media Group owns: Blacked Blacked Raw Vixen Tushy Deeper Founded by Greg Lansky who is jewish Aylo/MindGeek Owns/owned: Pornhub YouPorn RedTube Brazzers Reality Kings Digital Playground Men. com Sean Cody Tube8 Solomon Friedman is the owner of Aylo and he’s jewish Gamma Entertainment owns/operates: Adult Time Pure Taboo Wicked many other affiliate studios/platforms Founded by Karl Bernard who is jewish -Movies/TV/News Warner Brothers Discovery owns: Warner Bros. Pictures HBO CNN DC Studios Cartoon Network Discovery Channel TNT TBS Max (formerly HBO Max) Adult Swim HGTV Food Network Animal Planet Warner Brothers is run by David Zaslav who is jewish Disney owns: ESPN ABC Marvel Studios Lucasfilm Pixar 20th Century Studios Disney Hulu (major controlling stake) National Geographic Disney is run by Bob Iger who is jewish Paramount Global owns: CBS CBS News CBS Sports Local CBS stations Film Studios Paramount Pictures Paramount Animation Cable Networks MTV Nickelodeon Comedy Central BET VH1 CMT TV Land Smithsonian Channel Logo TV Pop TV Streaming/Premium: Paramount Showtime Pluto TV Major franchises/IP: Top Gun Mission: Impossible Star Trek South Park (licensing/streaming) SpongeBob SquarePants Transformers Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Paramount Global is controlled by Sheri Redstone, who is jewish Comcast owns: NBCUniversal NBC Universal Pictures Peacock MSNBC CNBC Telemundo Sky (Europe) DreamWorks Animation Xfinity Comcast is controlled by Roberts family who is Jewish Amazon owns: Amazon Prime MGM Studios⁠ Twitch⁠ Audible⁠ IMDb⁠ Amazon Music⁠ Ring⁠ Blink⁠ Amazon Echo Alexa Kindle Amazon is run by Andy Jassy who is jewish -AI/Data Centers OpenAI/ChatGPT Run by Sam Altman who is jewish Palentir provides advanced data integration, surveillance, AI, and analytics infrastructure used by military, intelligence, law enforcement, and major corporations. Its platforms help organizations combine massive amounts of fragmented data into real-time operational intelligence for warfare, policing, logistics, cybersecurity, manufacturing, and decision-making, making it one of the most strategically influential data and defense technology companies in the world. Was founded by Alex Karp, Peter Thiel, Stephen Cohen and Joe Lonsdale, 3 of the 4 are jewish and the other gives speeches on the Antichrist. Operated by Alex Karp who is jewish. Oracle owns: Oracle Database Java MySQL NetSuite Cerner Sun Microsystems technologies It’s important because it owns core infrastructure software that powers governments, banks, hospitals, corporations, and large parts of the internet. Its control of technologies like Oracle Database, Java, MySQL, and Cerner gives it enormous influence over the backend systems modern society depends on. Owned by Larry Ellison who is jewish

Just drove across town to break into someone’s house. He tried to stop me from pouring gasoline all over his living room so I had to murder him in self-defense.

BOOM BOOM TEL AVIV

🖕🏻 🇮🇱

Westoid weebs don't sincerely like Japan. They dig a defeated, subservient Japan with low cost hookers and 711 onigiri. 1980s peak Japan was widely hated in the West.

Guess in what language the Ukrainian tennis player Kostyuk was talking with her Ukrainian counterpart Svitolina before quarter final match? The two most ardent Ukrainian "patriots" who made a political spectacle out of the tournament spoke their native Russian to each other.

About 60 days ago your President killed 160 schoolgirls for Israel

A young girl from #Xinjiang accidentally broke the bowls during her “bowl dance” performance. As she tried to hold back tears, the judges comforted her warmly: “If they hadn’t broken, we might have thought they were fake.”

The Chinese have democracy. Wypipos are ruled by pedos.

Also in the war you pushed.

Hey can anyone explain to me why corporate media in the United States is breathlessly reporting on a deal that literally does not exist and whose terms no one agrees on, I mean I understand corporate journalism wants to lick the ball sweat off POTUS but this is getting ridiculous

💔➡️😭➡️😡➡️🤬🤬🤬

“Right now we're doing a pause [on arms to Taiwan] to make sure we have the munitions we need for Epic Fury,” Cao told Sen. Mitch McConnell. responsiblestatecraft.org/ta…

Elbridge Colby’s Beijing Mission: How an Overstretched Empire Tries to Buy Time from China SCMP scmp.com/news/china/military… reports that the Pentagon plans to send a high‑level delegation to Beijing “within weeks,” led by Elbridge Colby, US Undersecretary of WAR for policy and key architect of the 2026 US National Defense Strategy. Officially, the purpose is technical: prepare arrangements for Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth’s follow‑on visit, after he broke an eight‑year gap as the first US defence chief to set foot in China and the first to accompany a sitting president on a state visit since normalisation in the 1970's On the surface, this looks like “stabilization” and “guardrails” after several tense years in the Western Pacific. But if you read this move alongside Wess Mitchell’s Strategic Sequencing, Revisited—published at Colby’s own Marathon Initiative Think Tank—plus the 2026 NDS, a different picture emerges Most likely Colby’s mission is not a sign of genuine détente. It’s a tactical pause by an overstretched hegemon that needs China to sit still while Washington struggles with Russia, Iran and a still‑unfinished alliance build‑up in Asia The Real Problem in Washington: Too Many Fronts, Not Enough Power Mitchell’s sequencing paper admits in unusually blunt language that the US cannot handle simultaneous high‑intensity confrontations with China, Russia and Iran. The American defence industrial base is overtaxed, munitions are limited, and political will is finite. His answer is a neat academic formula: sequence the enemies The ideal script looks like this: Engineer a “strategic defeat” for Russia in Ukraine on a faster timeline than China’s Taiwan window Force Europe to take over more of its own defence so US forces and money can shift to Asia Use that breathing space to rebuild the US defence industrial base and harden the alliance system in the Indo‑Pacific Only then confront China in a more decisive manner over Taiwan and regional order The 2026 NDS—where Colby’s fingerprints are obvious—mirrors this logic. It openly ranks threats and theatres: China is the “pacing challenge,” Russia is secondary, the Middle East and others are risk‑accepted sideshows but necessary to contain China. In theory, sequencing gives Washington a way to manage decline while still defending a US‑led order The problem for the US: reality didn’t cooperate. Russia cannot be “defeated on schedule” in Ukraine, Iran refuses to surrender, and China kept shifting the balance in the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea in its favour. The neat sequence schedule broke down When the Sequence Breaks, the Hegemon Looks for a Pause Colby’s sudden importance as an envoy makes sense only against this background of strategic overload. The US now faces: A grinding, inconclusive Russia–Ukraine war of attrition that still consumes too many resources and political oxygen. An Iran war with uncertain outcome which can drag on for years and end in the destruction of the GCC, petrodollar and permanent global energy supply shock A PLA that is rapidly modernizing closing the US military capability gap especially around 1st and 2nd Island Chain while upgrades to US alliances and basing in Asia are still mid‑construction Mitchell’s model assumed the US could “deal with” Russia and stabilize secondary theaters before Taiwan became truly dangerous. Instead, Washington is being squeezed from all three directions at once. Under those conditions, sending the architect of the NDS to Beijing to talk “guardrails” is not a gesture of friendship; it is a defensive move. The empire needs to slow one front down—China—so it does not get dragged into a three‑front crisis it cannot win “Strategic Stability” as Cover for a Harder Denial Strategy The key to understanding Colby’s mission is the 2026 NDS itself. Publicly, the document is full of soothing words: “strategic stability,” “responsible competition,” “guardrails,” “crisis communication.” But the operational core is a denial strategy along the First Island Chain: reorganise US forces and allies to prevent a rapid PLA fait accompli against Taiwan or decisive gains in the Western Pacific. That means: More forward fires and logistics positioned in Japan and the Philippines Increased integration and interoperability of US‑Japan‑Philippines forces A defence industrial base rebooted around long‑range munitions and maritime/air denial in the Western Pacific “Strategic stability” is not a counterweight to this project; it is the lubricant. Crisis hotlines and military‑to‑military mechanisms are meant to make aggressive US operations near China’s coast less risky for Washington, not to reduce the underlying pressure on China So what does Colby probably wants from this visit? 1⃣ Buy time Washington wants to avoid major escalations over Taiwan and the South China Sea while the US finishes stabilising the Russia–Ukraine front, manages the Iran problem, and builds out its Asia alliance architecture. The message probably will be: “We accept rivalry, but let’s not collide—yet!” 2⃣ Codify “rules” that favour US operations: The mil‑mil talks, hotlines and crisis protocols are about setting patterns: how close US aircraft and ships can operate, how incidents are managed, how quickly senior leaders talk when something goes wrong. If the US can get China to normalise high‑tempo US presence just outside its red lines, the strategy of denial becomes cheaper for Washington 3⃣ Calm allies while hardening them: Australia, Japan and the Philippines are being asked to accept more US access, more deployments, and more risk. Colby can tell them: “Don’t worry, we have guardrails with Beijing.” Stability with China is a sales pitch to make US‑led militarisation more palatable domestically in allied capitals and for AUKUS members This is not peace‑making. It’s risk management for the stronger side in the short term, and coalition consolidation for a more intense confrontation later. China remains the “pacing challenge” and primary focus of long‑term denial planning in the NDS Taiwan Island is the unspoken centre of US force‑planning, even if the word is carefully downplayed in the unclassified text The entire purpose of sequencing is to defend a US‑led order more efficiently, not to accept a truly multipolar system where China, Russia and others have equal strategic agency. This combination is dangerous: a declining hegemon that still refuses to accept multipolarity, but is now smart enough to manage its decline tactically From an armchair strategist's perspective like me, the implications for Taiwan and the South China Sea are unsurprising but sobering. Washington wants to prevent a “Russia‑style surprise” in the Taiwan Strait, where the PLA moves faster than Western politics and logistics It probably will therefore quietly accelerate arms, planning, and denial capabilities around Taiwan while using “strategic stability” language to keep things calm If Colby succeeds in locking in crisis‑management mechanisms, US decision‑makers may become more willing to take risks near China’s red lines, believing they can control escalation Expect more US and allied presence in and around the South China Sea, backed by new infrastructure in the Philippines and expanded roles for Japan “Guardrails” will not reduce the tempo; they will normalise it. The waters and skies around China will be busier, but with better telephone lines For China, this is still encirclement—just with better customer service! The US is not suddenly reasonable; it is simply overextended. “Stability” with China will be a tool to save a failing sequencing plan, not a recognition of China’s legitimate security interests For now I would draw three practical conclusions: US engagement is tactical and reversible. Once Washington judges that Russia is “under control,” Iran is contained, and Japan/Philippines are fully wired into the First Island Chain, the US will likely feel freer to take more escalatory steps against China The current window—when the US is asking for guardrails—is actually a window of relative leverage for China. This is the moment to deepen partnerships with Russia and the Global South, strengthen its own deterrent, and push for a multipolar architecture that will outlast any single US administration ASEAN and other regional states should be sceptical of US claims that guardrails equal safety. What Washington really wants is a more predictable environment for its own forward deployments. Stability, in US usage, means “we can pressure China without stumbling into war by mistake” For now, Colby probably will arrive in Beijing as the polite face of this strategy: smiling, talking about “responsible competition” and “avoiding the Thucydides Trap,” while carrying a doctrine that still treats China as the main obstacle to a US‑centric order. The question for Chinese policymakers is not whether to meet him, but how to use this pause to ensure that when Washington’s sequencing clock runs down, the balance of power looks very different from what the Marathon Initiative crowd expects

Why were RAF Jets wasting taxpayers’ money prowling about the Black Sea in the first place?

RT @wasalive22: Africa’s greatest leader was murdered just 10 days before his 36th birthday. The CIA sent the poison. Belgium sent the firi…

That's funny, because even according to the laws that govern Taiwan, i.e. laws that were NOT written by the CPC, Taiwan is a part of China. Read the "ROC" Constitution, Additional Articles of the Constitution, and the Cross Strait Act. Actually, I'll link you in the tweet below

Is this the new version of “if not for us, you'd be speaking German”?

BREAKING: The Chinese satellite company MizarVision, who shared satellite images of US bases, says they don’t give a flying damn about US sanctions against their company.