Tech consultant. AI enthusiast. Automated Agile founder. Book a call: calendly.com/paul-automateda…

Joined September 2022
69 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
Introducing Automated Agile
1
466
I swear in Obsession that girl is possessed by his dead cat.
3
It’s getting to the point that the people of Britain may need international help. You can’t use any social media but Bluesky? Are they fucking nuts?
🚨NEW: The confirmed list of social media apps/sites under-16s in the UK will be banned from using: - TikTok - YouTube - Snapchat - Instagram - X (formerly twitter) - Reddit - Facebook - Twitch - Kick - Threads
18
Ok Disclosure Day is a terrible movie.
1
1
39
I’m gonna watch Disclosure Day now. Let’s see what modern Spielberg is like.
1
37
Every word.
Replying to @alexfmac
@KanishkaNarayan has a Jekyll and Hyde personality: By night, he is seducing startups with a vision of a great AI-first UK. By day he's on television sprouting unspeakable nonsense about saving children by installing spyware on millions of phones, about needing to do ID checks on UK citizens, about taking down US companies. So here's the thing: Either he has no clue technically - which is very worrying given his AI job - or he knows it's all nonsense, he knows it's child safety masking a state surveillance plan. And he know it's technically impossible to work, it's a security disaster, and it's going to lead to a good fraction of UK citizens intentionally working around the law because they don't want to be mass surveilled. And, given the experience in Australia, he knows it's going to be completely ineffective. I guess it takes a politician to hold two such irreconcilable views and try to push them both. It's hard to give credit for the Dr Jekyll side of the role, given the intentional misinformation being sprouted by Mr Hyde.
1
60
Lucy from the Ministry of Truth: Protect Democracy by Banning the Most Popular Party
Reform is importing populist tactics which have undermined democracy elsewhere to here, fuelling online mis and disinformation, conspiracies and murky crypto donations. We need tougher action. My latest in the Guardian 👇 theguardian.com/politics/202…
1
1
64
Paul retweeted
Replying to @DailyMail
If you can’t see it now, you never will. Pigs in clothes.
1
1
6
266
“The way you turn AI into a compounding asset is by codifying your best ways of working and then democratizing it across your company in a way that wasn't possible before.” 🎯
Completely agree. The way you turn AI into a compounding asset is by codifying your best ways of working and then democratizing it across your company in a way that wasn't possible before. One of the more common requests we get from companies earlier in their AI journey now is to stand up their internal skill library & fill that library with skills that we build through interviews/sessions with top performers.
70
I’m watching Mandalorian & Grogo and Sigourney Weaver is claiming the old wise lady role in ANOTHER franchise. We love you but leave some crumbs for the rest of the old sci fi ladies, Jesus.
32
Paul retweeted
Prototype Explorer boards on the line. This board is going to change so much and only $99. Learn more about it here explorerboard.tech/
11
15
241
16,479
Smart move @Mather_Keir
Keir Mather showing why he’s the youngest minister since Gladstone
2
328
Paul retweeted
Imagine agreeing with Tony Blair's opinions while *not* being paid the millions Tony Blair gets paid to have those opinions. You just, organically, believe in this bullshit, do ye aye?
Superb intervention from Tony Blair. Agreed with almost every aspect of his analysis.
22
45
362
13,327
Some great architecture skills here for your software factories.
May 25
Just added Skills to performance.dev/skills! Every article now has a Markdown version built for agents. Over time, I’ll be curating a living performance skill from everything I’ve learned along the way.
126
These guys are a solid competitor of ours. Worth a look if agentic operating systems are your goal.
Consulting firms have been lying to themselves and their customers for months. They keep charging for the pre-AI length of missions while their consultants are usually able to complete them in 1/3 of the time using AI. They have historically been selling top 1% human intelligence at a very high price but AI is already able to do most of the work their consultants do today, for a fraction of the cost and time. Their customers know that hence their doubts on the current value proposition. They will not admit it, but human consultants are the bottleneck. Most firms are trying to augment consultants instead of redesigning the work. In discovery, for example, consultants still run the interviews manually, record them, and feed the transcripts into an AI model to structure the insights and draft recommendations. That makes each consultant faster but does not change the scale of the mission. They can still only interview as many people as human time allows. Today’s models can already do a large share of the work consulting firms charge millions of dollars for. And that share will only grow. There is no reason for humans to do work that agents can already do faster, better, and at scale. One of the usual objection is domain expertise that humans and consulting firms have built over time, but that is mostly a temporary and feedback loop problem. Humans should step in at the end of the loop, let the agents do most of the work, review their outputs, correct reasoning, and feed their expertise back after every mission in order to then build deeper industry and workflow-level knowledge over time. Mission after mission, this will become a dataset no human team will ever match. We are rebuilding the AI-native version of consulting at Foaster and our customers who used to hire MBBs love it.
1
2
200
If you agentically manufacture code then @brotzky is producing amazing context files for your architecture agent.
May 20
Introducing performance.dev! A new space where I explore how the best apps in the world are built. First piece: How's Linear is so fast? a technical breakdown. performance.dev/how-is-linea…
2
3
711
I think Nicholas Cage is the best actor who ever lived. Fight me.
34
Do you know how many times mud has defeated armies.
2
32
I’ve been trying @cerebras for Automated Agile’s process inference. We got it working at every step, and at a speed that really helps the UX. I tuned our software factory to it today trying to classify how much of our own product we could build and edit using Cerebras and their models. The score: 22 work classifications across the codebase. 13 ship Q1 from a single LLM call — diffs that pass git apply, ruff, mypy, pytest --collect-only, per-class deterministic gates, AND a five-persona review panel. Backend routes, bug fixes, components, migrations, ORM models, tests (add fix), docs, skill templates — all manufacture cleanly. Backed by ~270 per-class gates and an execution-verify layer that won’t pass anything the panel marks Q1 unless the diff actually applies and runs. Then I pointed it at a real product feature on this same codebase: “add GET /api/factory/reliability returning the empirical reliability matrix as JSON.” Five attempts, four hit panel-Q1 at 92–100 confidence. The best was 143 lines of typed Pydantic FastAPI tests, ruff/mypy clean, structurally a thing I’d merge. None actually mergeable yet - every attempt got the structure right and hallucinated the data schema instead of grounding in real report files. Updated the scenario with the verbatim schema and rerunning. The lesson: with qwen-3-235b on Cerebras, structure comes for free. Grounding has to be explicit. Cerebras speed is what makes this loop work. A 22-class × 5-attempt sweep finishes in ~40 minutes wall-clock. When “try it five times” costs almost no time, the engineering loop reshapes - less guessing about what will work, more measuring. Prompts and context get you so far, but you need an empirical analysis of success if you are ever going to turn trust into verify.
82