135 British MPs are fighting guidance that would deny ‘Paula’ the right to enter women’s and girls’ changing rooms.

But you can't stop a rubber dinghy?

Every shit parenting Karen delighted that the State has come to their rescue in the failure to parent properly is why this country is a shadow of its former self.

Whatever is going on in the world, Thomas Sowell always got there first and summed it up perfectly.

Switzerland votes to reject a cap on its population in a referendum, which would have put a legal limit on immigration numbers. We should absolutely hold the same referendum here in the UK. news.sky.com/story/switzerla…

Dear Lush (cc Chelmsford City Council), As a woman who had half a breast removed last year due to cancer, I am writing to raise my concerns about your “Proud of My Stripes” window display. I am also, on behalf of other women who have experienced breast cancer, respectfully requesting its removal. Because mastectomies are not a fashion statement, an identity marker or something to be celebrated. They are something women undergo because they are ill, because they are frightened, because they are trying to stay alive. Around 59,000 women are diagnosed with breast cancer in the UK every year. Many will undergo surgery - a mastectomy, lumpectomy or other procedure. Others choose preventive mastectomies because they carry a high-risk BRCA gene mutation. If a woman chooses to have her breasts removed to affirm a gender identity, that is her personal choice. I honestly don’t know the number of women who have elective mastectomies for this reason. What I do know is that it is a tiny number compared with those for whom breast surgery is medically necessary and not something to be celebrated. I think I speak for many women who have experienced breast cancer - and for their families - when I say this: Breast removal surgery is not something I regard as cute, playful or empowering. Nor is it something I believe retailers should be celebrating. For that reason, I am requesting that the display be removed and that @ChelmsCouncil apologise for promoting it on social media. Yours sincerely, Janet Murray

Ugh. This is DISGUSTING @LushLtd. Teenage girls love to shop in your stores and here you are happily encouraging them to CUT OFF THEIR HEALTHY BREASTS in the name of trans pride. This is beyond repulsive. It's dangerous and sick. No parent should allow their child near your stores. Please share: #BoycottLushNow

The black & white tea towel brigade wouldn’t have the balls to set foot inside the good forsaken hell hole of ‘Palestine’ Pro-pally twats. Get back to me when you’ve left your fucking vegan cafe in Brighton & seen the misery of living under Hamas / PA

I think possibly the best thing about Elon Musk becoming a trillionaire is how angry it makes a bunch of losers who've never built a thing in their lives.

Barnaby Philip John Webber 11/01/2004-13/06/2023 💔 If you can, share these images of the beautiful soul stolen from us by the worst of humanity. Let his face today burn bright. Barney, I promise you there will be accountability 💛💚 For You. For Grace. For Ian.

Polanski’s statement is glaringly incomplete because it ignores the injuries suffered by the police, which is exactly the kind of omission that weakens his case. If he wants to argue that the sentences were excessive, he still has to acknowledge the harm done to officers and explain why that should not matter; otherwise, it reads as selective outrage, not serious political judgment. Actions have consequences, and once a protest crosses into serious violence, it is not credible to speak as though only the protesters’ side of the story counts.

Demand statutory public inquiry into Henry Nowak’s death - Sign the Petition! c.org/7KKzrfgZ5s via @UKChange

Demand statutory public inquiry into Henry Nowak’s death - Sign the Petition! c.org/7KKzrfgZ5s via @UKChange

We’re at the stage now where beheadings are regrettable, but tweets are unforgivable.

Indeed, when ministers treat scrutiny as an inconvenience, you can be fairly sure they’ve got something they’d rather not have challenged. If the government is confident in its Defence Review, it should stop hiding behind procedure and explain it to Parliament like grown-ups.

Iain Dale left stunned by calm caller on LBC A composed caller named Mike told Iain Dale on LBC that Britain “will remain almost ungovernable until we have mass deportations”. The exchange was striking because the caller spoke in measured tones, clearly articulating a view held by millions of people across the country. Yet Iain struggled to process it, repeatedly falling back on “you can’t do that”. Mike highlighted the obvious disconnect: the British public have consistently voted for lower immigration, only for politicians to deliver record levels instead. “There’s a massive disconnect between the political class and the people of this country,” he said. “We never gave any consent to this and there’s certainly no mandate for the scale of immigration we’ve seen.” When Iain pushed back, saying you can’t deport people here perfectly legally, the caller was unflinching: Caller: “You mean end indefinite leave to remain?” Iain: “You can do that for future people but you can’t do that for people who have already got it. That would be outrageous.” Caller: “Yeah you can. Of course you can.” Iain: “From a fairness point of view, you can’t suddenly tell people who’ve got a perfect legal right to be here that we’re changing the rules now…” Caller: “You can, Iain.” Iain: “Well you can do that but is that really the kind of country you want to live in?” Caller: “Yes!” Iain continued to argue that you can’t “take it out on perfectly legal, law-abiding people”, clearly unable to grasp how widespread this frustration has become. The public didn’t always feel this way. Years of politicians ignoring the public on immigration have shifted attitudes dramatically. As the caller made clear, people never voted for this transformation and the consequences of fixing it now rest with those who created the problem. Well worth a listen. The gap between Westminster and the rest of the country has rarely been clearer.

Women are not being unreasonable for wanting sex-based boundaries. They are being told to accept the risk so nobody has to enforce them properly.

Labour’s now in the classic position of trying to be the party of net zero and the party of endless AI expansion at the same time. They’re racing to approve power-hungry data centres, cheering on compute like it’s the whole future, and then acting surprised when the carbon maths doesn’t cooperate. It’s less joined-up government than a group project where nobody read the brief and everyone’s working against each other.

Nothing says “fight the wealthy elite” quite like delivering the lecture in a Gucci blouse. 🙄 We see you.