The West will be saved by macho castizos

Joined January 2014
1,321 Photos and videos
Physiocrat retweeted
Asked for comment about UFC Fighter Josh Hokit saying “Michelle Obama is a man” in his post fight interview, WH spokesman Steven Cheung said “He had a great win last night. He showed toughness and the ability to pressure his opponent both on his feet and on the ground.”
1,041
157
1,496
1,341,179
Physiocrat retweeted
The greatest threat to our security is our debt. It is already past 100% GDP. We need to make real budget cuts.
115
154
117
Physiocrat retweeted
They nailed the aesthetics of America 250 🇺🇸
128
2,286
18,940
593,961
Physiocrat retweeted
I love that we’re the new Rome. Peace with Persia in the afternoon and a gladiator fight in the evening, all on the Emperor’s birthday. Another 1,000 years.
1,313
5,739
63,868
3,140,874
I agree with this prediction. The migrant pogrom will be successful and likely it will spread. The strategic killshot would be if N. Ireland turns its ire towards those who facilitated the invasion after their streets have been cleaned.
Fearless prediction: N. Ireland will be 90%( ) migrant free in 3 months. It is now clear to me that what we are seeing in N. Ireland is a sectarian pogrom. One which will in 3 months be utterly successful in driving out 90%( )... N.I. "Troubles Pogrom"🧵 1/
28
I’m coming around on Planter.
I was working on a fake excerpt from the Graham Platner article but I don’t think I can top this
57
Physiocrat retweeted
It's rare for imagery this iconic to emerge organically. It's just a still taken from the body cam of Henry's murder and yet it is so poetic in its composition. The pale white flesh of Henry's hand, visibly depleted of blood as he is moments away from death, is both contrasted against his dark clothing and illuminated by the rays of the flashlight such that the image takes on the characteristics of a renaissance painting. Henry's hand is curled into something like fist. It naturally draws comparisons to Black Lives Matter and the "Black Power" Fist iconography, Henry's dying paleness evoking "White Power," the boogeyman we have destroyed our societies attempting to stymie. But there is no "White Power." Henry is dying. The fist is literally shackled, constrained, and drained of life. It is being "attacked" by the begloved hands, artificial, latex, inhuman, contorted into the shape of a predatory claw. These are literally the arms of the state. The "Systemic Organism." Our ultimate tyrant. These are not the hands of the individual officers to whom they actually belong, but rather the hands of a system, a meta-organism. Hands following orders that did not come from the minds of the human individuals but rather the Systemic Egregore. Hands operating under explicit instructions to elevate testimony that claims "racism" and to treat all Whites with suspicion as avatars of that "ultimate evil" against which the system has oriented itself. Except Henry was not evil. He was a victim of this inhuman system. This grotesquely maligned system embodied and visible in the grotesque blue claw clasping him and holding him down as he dies. The system that shackles the dying White "Power." Henry is Britain. He is the West. We are all dying. We are all bleeding to death shackled by the inhuman systems we live under. And if we continue to be shackled by these systems, we will, like Henry, die. The total repudiation of these governments are necessary to make any change. Incremental improvements are entirely insufficient. The time to be ungovernable is now. Regime change is necessary. Remigration is necessary. The mass rejection of the status quo and its systems is necessary. Revolution is necessary.
273
2,744
12,253
251,379
“I’ve been stabbed.” “I don’t think you have, mate.”
Bodycam footage of 18-year-old Henry Nowak’s arrest shortly prior to his death by stabbing.
58
“A boy with no place in the village will burn it to feel the warmth.”
I don’t think people are willing to accept that they’re going to get a lot less pro-social behavior from men when they openly refuse to incentivize it. The intrinsically motivated are and will remain a minority, and one that’s quietly tuned them out.
3
146
This is rough. Balaji assumes that the trajectory of the past 20 years will continue unabated. He is wholly unaccustomed to violence as a solution. One can hope for technoutopia but we have to prepare for internet balkanization by force.
May 26
Replying to @romanhelmetguy
Your post has several embedded points that I disagree with. Let's go. THE US MILITARY IS MADE IN CHINA "If China and the USA go to war..." (1) China and the US aren't going to war, because the US military is literally made in China. See the $400M Govini study commissioned by the Pentagon itself[a], which shows that famous American armaments like the JDAM and Tomahawk are ultimately dependent upon Chinese suppliers. (2) Unfortunately, that means China can simply turn off the Republican military. You can't fight your factory. The whole defense industrial buildup to "fight China" is essentially a LARP. I like a lot of the guys involved with that, and I appreciate their wishful thinking, and it may bear results on a multi-decadal time scale...but there's no way that 77M MAGA Republicans are competing with 1.4B Chinese in manufacturing anytime soon. China's flex on rare earths was just the beginning of their enormous leverage over the US economy and military. (3) However, most of the world didn't fully understand this. They thought the US military was still the military of 1991, or 2003. That's why the war in Iran should never have been fought; the Republicans should have instead spent their political capital quietly rebuilding, while everyone thought they were still strong. Instead, they just pursued a foolhardy campaign which ended in public defeat. US military bases across the Middle East got blown up by Iranian missiles, with soldiers reduced to working remote, and ships pulled back far from the theater. This sucks, but now even neocons like Kagan are acknowledging total defeat [b,c]. (4) So: after the defeat in Iran, it's unlikely there is war with China (which is >100X Iran). However, similar to how the post-Soviet Russia got into fights with its neighbors, like the Chechens and Ukrainians, the post-imperial America will probably get much more involved in Latin America. But that's a whole separate topic. CITY STATES VS NETWORK STATES "...what you’re actually talking about is just starting some small city states around the world..." (1) First, hopefully you'll agree that new cities are pretty cool in their own right, and are how America was born in the first place. The Massachusetts Bay Colony built the City on a Hill, remember? (2) Second, I'm expressly not only talking about centralized city states, which are entirely dependent on their geographic host, but also distributed network states. There's a concrete visual here[d], but to first order you can think of it as "just" a physical social network, albeit with financial and technological resources on par with a legacy state. Similar to how some countries are islands separated by oceans, you can imagine new countries that are groups of islands (or enclaves) separated by Internet. (3) The key precedent here is decentralized crypto, which is much bigger than the the vast majority of country-scale economies in the world. Were all the crypto datacenters wiped off the map, and all cryptocurrency holders killed the second a "superpower" decided crypto was inconvenient? No, crypto actually flipped both superpowers. It was a fight with words and code, not guns, but crypto is now legal in much of the world, including not just the US and EU, but even Hong Kong in China. (4) Fourth, your beliefs were likely also considered "subversive" by far leftists for many years. But technologists defended your right to free speech, with code. And ultimately what matters is whether a belief is true, and whether it produces human flourishing. NATION OF EMIGRANTS "...didn’t you flee to Singapore?" (1) This sentence makes no sense. It's like saying "didn't you flee to Stanford" or "didn't you flee to Google". Lest you didn't know, Singapore is by some measures now the richest country in the world[e,f]. You apply to move there, and it has borders, and rejects many applicants. You cannot simply "flee" there. (2) Now, with that said, your sentence does make sense in a different context, which is that millions of Republicans and technologists HAVE fled...because they fled Democrat-controlled states like California for places like Texas and Florida, to escape the violence and drug addicts. (3) I am sympathetic, of course. But there is a difference between simply fleeing Blue America for the next state over, as opposed to consciously moving and then coming up with a plan. The obvious plan is to just vote within your existing city or country, and of course you can do that, but perhaps one can do something more. (4) My plan is simple: use the Internet to peacefully build new opt-in communities, build new cities, and connect them together. In the fullness of time, I do think that we can use the Internet to build many alternatives to places like San Francisco and Los Angeles, drain them of their best people, and demonstrate that a new birth of freedom is possible. That will either reform places like SF and LA, or it will end them, but either way the people finally get a true democratic choice of governments, with 1000 cities to chose from. (5) In other words: we want 1000 startup societies and network states around the world, each for a different subculture, some for Americans, and some for others. That's also part of why I moved here, to learn from Lee Kuan Yew's work. (6) Again, this is how America itself was started. The Pilgrims and Puritans "fled" to New England and started a new city on the hill, which eventually outclassed most of the cities in the old world. A group of Irish Americans "fled" from Ireland to America to join them. Really, they didn't simply flee, they moved, and they built something better. (7) Finally: yes, of course, it did take centuries to scale Boston to a population of 673,000. But the Internet got to billions of users in just a few decades. With new tech, we might be able to scale new cities much faster than they did before. Elon's Starbase is already well on its way, by the way. And that's what I mean by printing out the Internet. [a]: govini.com/insights/numbers-… [b]: theatlantic.com/internationa… [c]: theatlantic.com/internationa… [d]: thenetworkstate.com/the-netw… [e]: straitstimes.com/singapore/s… [f]: asiaone.com/money/singapore-…
1
131
Vietnam -> sandbox wars (no draft, fewer casualties) 20% mortgage -> purchase price unreachable Pensions -> 401k’s going to collapse due to AI bubble Industry shutdowns -> Immigration. Oil shortage -> COVID Why is it so hard to admit that boomers were peak?
Do Zoomers get drafted for a meat grinder like the Vietnam War? Pay 20% mortgage rates? Lose pensions? Have entire industries like factories close down? Wait in line for gas stations due to oil shortage? Every generation has something to complain about. Life is never easy.
1
109
Physiocrat retweeted
16 Nov 2020
Ever seen a panda give birth ? You have now 😂 No birthing sack and no umbilical cord?🤔 Is this some sort of joke? How can that be ? Because it’s man made
14
12
60
The most infuriating part of this chart is that often state and local taxes exceed profit margins which means that governments make more from these businesses than the owners.
the general public overestimate the margins businesses make
34
SpaceX IPO (or NASDAQ inclusion) will mark the top of the market.
59
I’d take this further, I’m not sure there has been any IRL software advancement since the spreadsheet. I’m rural so no delivery apps or uber and I don’t play vidya. We had TiVO which lead to Netflix but other than that everything is just a spreadsheet display.
The point is simple We keep hearing about this 10-1000x in productivity – yet all developments seem completely lateral. I have repeatedly asked for ONE single example of this inhumane exaltation above human quality. A single uber-high quality product from this 100x productivity that would've taken a dedicated autistic coder 10 years in their basement to make, but made in around 1 year with AI assistance. Show us. Stand up and show the class. Entire comment section is a vague "you know nothing jon snow" rebuttal - not a single example. There are zero. zilch. There is nothing. AI is not even close to the level you think it is. Silicon valley marketing.
53
Physiocrat retweeted
“wHy aRe tHerE iNdiaNs In pOrTuGaL?!” Because they are good slaves, you are not. I hate essay-posting but allow me a rare indulgence: To understand what is happening now, you need understand that this isn’t the first time it’s happened. Why are there Indians in Kenya? Suriname? Fiji? Burma? Because Indians have always been the preferred servile class of elites. The evidence for this goes back hundreds of years. I’ve spoken about British colonial Burma before, and it is a great example of what this looks like. Even after extensive efforts to bring them to heel, the majority of the Burmese ethnic groups were far too resistant to submit to the British empire to be reliable labor. They refused to abandon their culture and ways of life to be slave drones for British pocketbooks. So the Brits started importing Indians to be their colonial administrators, preferring them as labor because they were easier to control and satisfy. By the 1940s, Indians made up almost 20% of the population of the entire country. Another great historical example of this is Suriname - a small country in South America that had been under Dutch colonial rule for 300 years. The Dutch abolished slavery in 1863, forcing colonial plantation owners to have to hire labor to do the work they had previously been using slaves for. But… they didn’t want to pay former slaves or Indigenous locals a living wage for the work. So what did the Dutch elites do instead? Import Indians. Today, Indians still make up 27% of the population. 27%. Of a tiny, obscure South American country. We could basically go through the list of every country with a non-negligible Indian population and the theme would be consistent: They were brought there by elites who needed a submissive, easily exploitable labor pool when local labor asked for better living conditions or wages. Why? Because Indians never did. They are a population that seems fully content with subjugation (even Marx noticed this). So it’s easy to see why they were such an ideal population for the intensive global expansion era of colonial empires. And it’s even easier to see why they are perfect subjects for late capitalism now. They are the culturally, psychologically, and physically ideal organism for the dominant system. There’s 1.4 billion of them. They are deeply socially stratified and so expect and even enjoy inequality. Their cuisine is cheap, meat-free slop. They live amongst trash and filth with no qualms. They don’t care about the environment. Their reaction to death and abuse is blank-eyed indifference. They are physically and spiritually malleable. They not only adopt and internalize the demands of the dominant system as personal ambition, they believe this servitude makes them better than everyone else who hasn’t. Absolutely IDEAL subjects. You, on the other hand, are not the ideal subject. You want to live in a high-trust society. You would shed tears if someone tried to cut down the apple tree you climbed as a child to build a data center. You want to see and experience beauty. You want your own space. You have an expectation that your living conditions will improve over time. You would not be content to live in a room with 10 other people, work 16 hours per day for pennies, and eat cheap slop. You are a liability. Just like the Burmese and Surinamese slaves were. And as we continue to crawl deeper into this late capitalist hellscape, you and your silly little needs will come into increasing conflict with those of the system. Thus, you WILL be replaced by people far easier to control and far less concerned about their own welfare or the welfare of everyone and everything around them. … Unless you do something about it. But the system has already locked-in that you won’t, and that you’ll just sort of fade into nothingness, distracted by meaningless comforts and terrified of the uncertainty of change. So “why are Indians in [wherever]?” Because you are about to not be.
I Exposed Portugal's Indian Invasion...
663
4,057
25,283
2,177,430
Even Mencious Moldbug has turned on the Israel experiment.
The world will not be free until the last Israeli lobbyist is strangled with the entrails of the last Palestinian activist
81
Physiocrat retweeted
California was promised to the Anglo Saxon. It is our Israel. It must be retaken.
128
421
7,108
150,891
Dems are terrified.
Abby Phillip: “I do think the H-1B program needs some attention. It needs some degree of reform.” Kevin O’Leary: “Abby, do you want the next Einstein to come to America or Shanghai?” Abby Phillip: “I’m not fighting against an H-1B visa, folks. I’m the daughter of immigrants. Both of my parents are naturalized citizens of this country... There are real concerns that people have about companies that abuse the system.” Kevin O’Leary: “We’re talking about genius, bringing 65K genius to America.” Abby Phillip: “Kevin, you know it’s not just genius. Sometimes they’re abusing the system and bringing in medium to low wage workers [to replace Americans].”
38