100% agree. Its all fake shit on computers. People still cook same way, travel same way but worse , build same but worse , sleep & dress same but worse. There has been zero development only pimp like business goons extracting money. I feel like AI is same packaging of same crap.

The world's 10 richest men VS. the world's 10 richest women. Spot the difference:

It is criminal that our government enabled a bat virus to infect and spread between humans. Indeed, it is hard to imagine a bigger betrayal of our species. It is equally troubling that the mad scientists who did this then gaslit all the people of the world about it, including those who CORRECTLY interpreted the evidence. Then, of course, the very same monsters amped up fear of the Covid frankenvirus and steered the panicked public away from safe medicines, and toward an obviously dangerous gene-therapy which they falsely called a vaccine in order to lure us into acceptance. These are among the greatest crimes EVER committed against humanity. We now have persuasive evidence of everything I have said above. If we don't correct the record and hold the perpetrators to account, this pattern will happen again, and again, and again--shortening our life expectancy, and degrading our quality of life each time that it does. This is our Nuremberg moment. We can not simply move on from this ghastly chapter of history. We must finish it. @brownstoneinst

Medicare fraud is a trillion dollar industry. Notice not one Democrat is trying to end this fraud and reallocate the money to serving the poor. That’s because they and their staff and friends and family are all in on it. Skimming and scamming.

Hey photographer, this is how to find the best lightning ⛈️

The most dangerous 77 seconds ever recorded by a psychiatrist just broke containment again. Thomas Szasz, the man the entire profession tried to erase, looked straight into the camera and said: “We do not have an epidemic of mental illness. We have an epidemic of psychiatry.” Too fat → illness Too thin → illness Too happy, too sad, too much sex, too little sex → all illnesses No free will, no responsibility left — only “chemical imbalances” fixed by products you can advertise on TV while alcohol cannot. This forgotten 1:17 clip is now exploding across every timeline for a reason. Jacob

Give her an oscar for that?

The reason is that industrial monoculture gutted 'town life' in the American Midwest. Thousands of these towns are zombies, animated by social security, medicare, and real estate inflation. Retirees own property, pay taxes for schools(property tax based off inflated land values from mass migration and money printing aka fake value) and employ hospital workers, artisanal small businesses, and subcontractors(plumbers, roofers, masons, carpenters, electricians, etc) all with that welfare money. Iowa's entire state budget is $9.65 billion. These old age programs bring in over triple that number annually: Social Security: $14.3 billion (2023) Medicaid (federal share): $6.27 billion Medicare: ~$11 billion (est.; 681k enrollees) Over the next decade the boomers will pass and the money will dry up. The fake rural small town economies will collapse along with their real estate values, and the governments will be insolvent.

I think it's about time we carve memes into rocks.

1920: HOW TO REDUCE THE COST OF LIVING

AI is crashing because everyone has realized all it does is remix things that people have already done and there is no way to make it better because it doesn't actually do anything. They tried to build a castle on BS and now it is all collapsing into the shit.

I have drafted an amendment that will cut federal funding to any state that does not purge their Voter Rolls, and this can be placed on Reconciliation.💡

Do you guys agree? Sad bt its the reality…

THE FORMULAS WHAT THEY MEAN AND WHY THEY MATTER I derived four deterministic linear formulas from the ballot drop data: Raman% = 27.87 (3.19 × drop number) Pratt% = 22.05 - (1.17 × drop number) Bass% = 40.20 - (1.86 × drop number) Other% = 9.88 - (0.16 × drop number) The Starting Points The constants - 27.87, 22.05, 40.20, 9.88 - represent each candidate’s baseline. Where they genuinely stood when post-election counting began. Real votes. Organic support. These are the numbers before anything unusual occurs. The Slopes - How the Formula Runs The slope is the increment applied to each candidate every single drop. It gets multiplied by drop number - 1, 2, 3, 4 - which means the effect escalates automatically with each drop. So for Raman it isn’t just plus 3.19% every drop. It’s: Drop 1: 27.87 (3.19 × 1) = 31.06% Drop 2: 27.87 (3.19 × 2) = 34.25% Drop 3: 27.87 (3.19 × 3) = 37.44% Drop 4: 27.87 (3.19 × 4) = 40.63% Drop 5 predicted: 27.87 (3.19 × 5) = 43.82% Each drop pushes her further from her baseline. It is built in. Automatic by design. The slopes also sum to exactly zero. 3.19 - 1.17 - 1.86 - 0.16 = 0.00 Every percentage point Raman gains comes precisely from the other three candidates/groups combined. This is a closed system. Conservation of votes. The formula doesn’t create votes - it redistributes them. The R Values - The results were remarkable To validate these formulas I ran linear regression analysis. The Pearson correlation coefficients, R values, came back as follows: Raman vs Pratt: R = 0.9966 Raman vs Bass: R = 0.9934 Raman vs Batch: R = 0.9984 Raman vs Other: R = 0.9794 R values measure how perfectly data fits a straight line. They run from 0 to 1. 0 means completely random. No pattern whatsoever. 1 means a perfect straight line. Every point exactly where predicted. For context: 0.70 is considered strong in social science research. 0.85 gets researchers excited. 0.90 is extraordinarily rare in human behavioral data. Squaring them to get R² values: Raman vs Pratt: R² = 0.9932 Raman vs Bass: R² = 0.9869 Raman vs Other: R² = 0.9592 Raman vs Batch: R² = 0.9968 That last number, 0.9968, means that 99.68% of Raman’s vote share movement across these drops is explained by a single variable. Drop number. Nothing else. Just counting to five. You get R values like that in physics experiments. In controlled laboratory conditions. Measuring the expansion of metal under heat. Not in elections. Not in a major American city with millions of diverse voters casting ballots across weeks. The Slope Relationship The slope of 3.110 between Raman and Pratt is particularly significant. It means for every percentage point Pratt lost Raman gained 3.110 points. Every drop. Without variation. Without noise. Candidates in a democratic election don’t move in mathematical opposition to each other at a fixed ratio across 200,000 ballots. Four variables in an equation do. Why The Shutoff Had To Exist Because drop number keeps increasing, the formula keeps pushing percentages further from baseline. Left unchecked by drop 7 the math produces: Raman: 27.87 (3.19 × 7) = 50.2% Pratt: 22.05 - (1.17 × 7) = 13.9% Bass: 40.20 - (1.86 × 7) = 27.2% So the formula was never intended to run to completion. It was designed to run until a specific objective was achieved, Raman leading Pratt by a sufficient margin to secure the runoff and then stop. The stopping condition appears to have been triggered at approximately 38,000 votes into drop 5. The precise moment Raman crossed 3,000 votes ahead of Pratt. After that point the remaining 9,800 votes in drop 5 distributed at approximately the baseline that existed after drop four. The formula completed its task. Then it stopped. And the numbers went back to looking normal.

The system is rotten

The Mayoral election in Los Angeles is being stolen from @spencerpratt in real time! Where is the DOJ?

That’s because fraud at scale takes time!

My sister lives in Los Angeles. She's a Democrat but voted for Spencer Pratt. I was with her when she dropped her ballot in the mail weeks ago. We checked today and it hasn't been received back. Are they just TOSSING ballots for Spencer Pratt?

💯

I have been reliably informed that a fee is not a tax.

🚨 ANOTHER MASTERCLASS FROM @3BLUE1BROWN The compressibility of language isn’t just a math curiosity, it’s the hidden engine behind every LLM you use. Grant’s new video reframes Shannon’s entropy through one elegant lens: Prediction IS compression. → The better you predict the next word, the fewer bits you need to store it → Shannon measured English at ~1 bit per character: astonishingly compressible → This is exactly what GPT-style models optimize → Intelligence, in this framing, is compression FUN FACT: Von Neumann told Shannon to name it “entropy” because nobody truly understands it anyway 😄 Decades later, that same concept became the bedrock of modern AI. Deep-dive resources in the 🧵 ↓