Non-invasive estimation of atrial fibrillation driver position using l... sciencedirect.com/science/ar…

Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and machine learning as a promising ... sciencedirect.com/science/ar…

🧵Muy decepcionado con @ANECAinfo y @UniversidadGob su desincentivo hacia la #multidisciplinariedad en la ciencia. Queremos avanzar, pero ¿cómo hacerlo si nos constriñen a áreas del conocimiento? El futuro está en las fronteras entre conocimientos. Dentro hilo enfadado:

As an academic writing coach, here are the 5 most common mistakes I see researchers make when they write their Discussion sections. A thread. 🧵 #PIchat #newPI #ECRchat — Mistake #1: Providing paragraphs of background information 📝 The Introduction section is meant for context. In the Discussion section, any mentioned background info needs to be *discussed* together with your own findings. — Mistake #2: Expecting the reader to have read all previous sections 💡 Tell the whole story by restating the problem you are solving with your study so that readers understand the motivation for your research. — Mistake #3: Describing the purpose and result of each experiment 🔬 This should be provided in the Results section. The Discussion is for actually *discussing* your findings, i.e. how your study has changed the state of the art and what the potential implications are. — Mistake #4: Too general implication statements 🌍 Avoid too broad statements that could mean everything and nothing. Be specific when you describe the potential implication of your findings even when some of them are speculative. — Mistake #5: Skipping the discussion altogether 🚫 Discussion sections are helpful for fellow researchers, journal editors and also journalists! If you have a combined Results & Discussion section, don't forget to include the discussion part! — TL;DR: The 5 most common mistakes in the Discussion section: #1: Providing too much background info #2: Not restating the motivation of your study #3: Describing the purpose of each experiment #4: Too general implication statements #5: Skipping the discussion altogether

La alumna Sara Valiente, premiada por un trabajo que ayuda al tratamiento de las arritmias - Universidad Rey Juan Carlos urjc.es/todas-las-noticias-d…

Last week, Corify Care technology was used in #HospitalGregorioMarañon and retransmitted for the XIX Ablation and navigation systems course

Here, Dr. @atienza_felipe describes how the ACORYS MAPPING SYSTEM was used during a case of paroxysmal AF ablation and mitral stenosis valvuloplasty.

Most grad school applications are due in less than a week! 📝If you're still adding those finishing touches, here are some tips to help you with the application process (1/8):

Este archivo de configuración fija muchos parámetros de la figura una vez invocado. Aquí os dejo el estilo que he usado yo para publicaciones científicas y que creo que funciona muy bien, aunque se puede retocar cualquier parámetro que consideréis. github.com/RayleighLord/Rayl…

2o premio en la competición de estudiantes de GIB @caseib2022 @saravalij @urjc @ETSIT_URJC: gran trabajo

Sesión de premios FENIN-SEIB para estudiantes de grado en ingeniería biomédica. El nivel de las presentaciones ha sido altísimo. Muchas gracias a todos los candidatos. #CASEIB2022 #XL #XLPerformance

Bien trabajo Sara

Kaggle is a fundamentally powerful platform to learn data science🤖🚀 Here are the TOP 7 kaggle resources to learn data science and solve complex data problems (Don't miss it!) 🧵👇

You should always work on improving your model evaluation skills. Model evaluation is the worst taught skill in machine learning, and I believe the best way of improving is through practice. But, this paper from @rasbt is by far my favorite single written resource:

How to write scientific article? Step by step guide for beginners #phd #research #researcher #AcademicTwitter sciencedirect.com/science/ar…

🤩10 reglas o consejos para escribir y estructurar un artículo científico 👥 Mensh y Kording (2017) 🔗 journals.plos.org/ploscompbi… #datascience #analytics #science #papers #publish #dataviz

The New England Journal of Medicine @NEJM is featuring a short video on atrial fibrillation and ablation for patients and primary care physicians. Highly recommend. @paulzei nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NE…

Thank you all!