No, no, no. You're thinking about it all wrong. A functioning file server would be a liability.
If Urbit actually stored and served everyone's files reliably today, people would start using it for files. Then we'd have to make it fast. We'd have to make it redundant. We'd have to handle backups, syncing, corruption, support tickets. That's infrastructure.
What we have is much more valuable.
We have the *option* of being a file server.
The vision of a file server.
A file server-shaped hole in the future.
Right now, every missing feature is proof of how early we are. Every failed upload is evidence of untapped potential. The fact that nobody can depend on it yet means the market is still entirely available.
The moment it becomes a good file server, people stop asking how big it could be and start asking why it's slower than Dropbox.
You don't want to be Dropbox. Dropbox has revenue.
Revenue means expectations.
Expectations mean accountability.
Accountability kills narrative.
We're building a decentralized, sovereign, peer-to-peer, identity-native, file-adjacent platform opportunity.
The less it functions as a file server today, the more it can function as one tomorrow.
It's a pure play.