*may contain traces of nuts.

Joined February 2017
2,947 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
31 Jul 2022
An amazing sight this afternoon…gannets dive bombing off the beach 💥
36
59
492
Did anyone else watch this performance and think it was just…odd? I couldn’t work it out tbh
1
4
26
Rangitoto wrapped in a fog blanket
9
7
83
813
Bridget P retweeted
Replying to @SeanPlunket
If you have diabetes think yourself lucky you aren’t Māori or Pasifika. You are 65% less likely to need amputation. Your death rate from diabetes is 9 times lower. Four times less likely to be hospitalized. Only 14% risk of needing dialysis compared to 54% if you were Māori
4
5
42
744
‘The specialist is wrong’ Sums up the idiocy of these people. No the specialist is not wrong. This is based on *evidence*. No doubt this individual is a fan of paying less tax. This policy will cost the system MORE. More kidney failure, dialysis, amputations, blindness…
7
4
32
768
One News: we’re excited to report we have our first trillionaire whilst we advise you to eat your own grass clippings if the world comes to an end 🥴
9
20
151
1,861
Doggo gets a medal for leaving rack of lamb untouched while they were both in my car unattended for 15 minutes 🥇
8
1
74
701
Bridget P retweeted
As a Gen Xer, how many times have you started typing a reply to a post, gotten halfway through, and then realized you just don’t care enough to finish it?
4,497
1,257
33,347
513,591
I’m only going to eat biscuits today. Nothing else, just biscuits 🍪
3
13
380
Better than doing the modeling, ignoring it, reacting it, and deciding to spend $1 billion anyway
This is farcical. True to form, Labour has once again demonstrated staggering incompetence by announcing a $65 million public transport fare cap without any modelling on how many passengers will actually take enough trips to exceed it. Transport spokesperson Tangi Utikere was asked a straightforward question. “What proportion of commuters will take enough trips to exceed the cap?” Utikere: I think a number will… it’s unknown at this stage” Unbelievably, there is zero modelling on this critical detail. Typical Labour incompetence. Announce the giveaway, skip the basics.
1
3
24
490
Why are they still pushing ahead with this then?
3
16
57
639
Bridget P retweeted
Jun 10
It amounts to approximately two (2) kilometres of Roads of National Party Significance funding In other words, you won't notice it. Unless you catch a bus or train more than three or four times a week In that case you'll be better off
Labour's first policy announcement in six months and it charges taxpayers $65,000,000 a year under the National Land Transport Fund. Where will that funding be redirected from?
12
22
151
4,303
Trump level bullshit
7
16
46
1,082
Bridget P retweeted
makes a lot of sense. Fuel costs are smashing families. So tackle the cost of living by getting people on to public transport and reduce fuel demand at the same time.
INBOX: Labour's first policy of 2026 is a public transport fare cap: - $20 for AKL, Wellington, Chch, - $10 for everywhere else
46
36
169
3,918
Bridget P retweeted
It's claimed renewables can't provide the 1500TWh of winter power LNG would provide in dry year they can. In a dry year, there's space in the hydrolakes (that's the problem!). In 2024, lakes had 2250TWh empty Build more solar, use less hydro, keep the lakes full for winter
So, the LNG terminal won't be funded by a levy but the suggestion is still that the power companies (who say LNG isn't needed) will pay? Surely that flows through to electricity prices, just like the levy would - but maybe less politically on the nose.
14
33
89
2,967
Bridget P retweeted
Because, of course they did
8
58
243
2,628
Bridget P retweeted
Post 1/5 I'm a cardiologist. TikTok is going to get someone killed. I'm not being dramatic. I'm not being old-fashioned. I am watching patients arrive in my office repeating advice from 15-second videos — advice that is not just wrong but actively dangerous. Last month a patient told me she stopped her statin because a wellness influencer said it was "toxic." Her LDL was 210. She has a family history of early heart attack. Last week a patient in his 40s told me he wasn't worried about his cholesterol because he "eats clean and exercises." His Lp(a) — completely genetic, immune to lifestyle — was sky-high. He'd never been tested. These aren't hypothetical scenarios. These are people I care about making decisions based on content created for engagement, not evidence. Let me walk through the most dangerous myths circulating right now — and what the science actually says.
104
36
367
185,864
Bridget P retweeted
I can't recall a Budget ever having money allocated to an unspecified policy before. & for something that may not be needed? between this & the $450m for energy crisis response, parties have a warchest for cost of living/energy policies at the election nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/b…
13
58
131
5,133
Bridget P retweeted
The resurgence of Hunter Biden really puts into perspective just how unlikable the Trump children are. They’re just a bunch of insufferable pricks.
407
1,909
24,533
160,844
Whoever thought making people sit exams in their teenage years was a good idea was completely out of their mind 😫
14
2
43
1,993