The wall at $400 USD will never be broken. Bookmark this.

One team can't build the best AI. So we stopped trying. We built an open arena instead. Here's what happened👇

τ

Ted Pillows accepted $9K total for multiple posts to promote a meme coin rug and deleted the paid post after. 4KjSQ9bu89CVuTy24rMMjha4fDo1bdLbE8CRCixdHyKPz2dFSuYVj8tXrhAaJ9Ubox7nVF8DdZ7ykiFvRPt2sLK6

#Bittensor $TAO #AI #dTao The safest strategy play in subnet's alpha trading would be: 1. Swapping all holding $TAO into the most liquidity subnet, where as a thousand Tao swap would cause less than 1% of votility in price action. @chutes_ai [Aka the most revenue earned subnet] 2. Hodl and Enjoy the highest state of APY from the subnet, before its own halvening [approx 50%]. 3. From time to time, using the profit [from price actions, and staking] to swap into other promising subnets which have: early price, feasible vision, executive team, and revenue earn-able for the long term. @0x_Markets @SynthdataCo @trishoolai @zeussubnet @ai_detection @AutoppiaAI @basilic_ai @gradients_ai @nepher_robotics @QuasarModels @Investing88ai @TrustedStake @AstridIntel You then are able to create your own market of bullishness in #decentralizedAI 😃

m/bittensor is live on moltbook The agent economy is waking up to $TAO

Which way humankind? #skynet

Hey @oblong_inc What happened to your reserves? 5CMwjifXAiTnxeHEv2zLSdHBy4rQ6zMQFAQR2w5LJtpDjyTP

People said I was nuts, but they didn't know about the wall $TAO

People complaining about the #SN41 fud are forgetting this slapper from const about how the only narrative that matters is one that makes @sportstensor better.

🤔

After a momentary depeg, $Tao is back to being a stablecoin

The wall at $500 USD will never be broken. Bookmark this.

@affine_io Part II. Recommendations: North Star: become the open coordination layer for reasoning progress on @bittensor by: (a) steady frontier model upgrades that generalize beyond benchmarks, (b) growing usagevia @chutes_ai , and (c) competitive α price → sustained emission share under dTAO. Mechanically, Affine pays miners to improve reasoning models, validators score across multiple RL environments, and the public uses the current winner via Chutes. Lock this flywheel, and α demand and emissions reinforce each other. Phase I — Mechanism Hardening & Trust (0–12 months) · Benchmark realism: expand beyond toy tasks to multi‑step code, SAT‑style puzzles, abduction/deduction and tool‑use—plus hold‑out, adversarial and OOD (out‑of‑distribution) splits. Publish a “Generalization Gap” metric next to the leaderboard. · Anti‑gaming & sybil resistance:rotate unseen tests, use per‑submission sandboxing and copy‑detection, and require runnable proofs (tests that execute). Keep the Pareto‑frontierscoring but add ensemble penalties to avoid trivial model merges. · Serving stability: formal SLOs (latency, availability) for the Chutes endpoint that serves Affine’s winner; document the auth path (wallet/hotkey) and minimize friction for miners to deploy to SN64. · Transparency: a monthly “Mechanism Health” report: number of unique miners submitting, winner turnover, average improvement deltas, serving usage, and emissions captured. Link to @taostats / @BackpropFinance for on‑chain corroboration. Phase II — Distribution & Real Users (12–24 months) · “Affine Reasoning API” on Chutes:package the live winner as a product with docs, SDKs, rate‑limits, and SLAs. Offer usage‑based pricing in TAO with optional enterprise invoicing. Chutes already provides the serverless inference substrate. · Reference apps: ship two production‑quality demos where reasoning matters (e.g., code‑assistant for unit‑test synthesis; structured problem solver for SAT/logic). The aim is not vanity traffic; it’s proof of business utility. Phase III — Ecosystem Integration(24–36 months) · Composable primitive: make the Affine winner easy to call from other subnets and dApps; publish a minimal “/reason” schema and quotas for cross‑subnet callers. Chutes is the natural distribution layer here. · Evaluation‑as‑a‑Service (EaaS):validators expose their evaluation harness as an API so other subnets can score their models against Affine’s battery of tests. Phase IV — Economic Durability(36–60 months) · Revenue diversification:inference API, EaaS, enterprise SLAs, validator‑as‑a‑service (run validators for enterprises who stake α), and curated data/benchmark packs (open weights, commercial terms). Keep α aligned to real usage rather than reflexive token loops. Governance & treasury: codify how the owner’s 18% emissions are reinvested (grants, audits, liquidity), publish treasury policy, and run an independent validator council. Under dTAO, α price ↔ emission share is the loop—treat governance as market infrastructure. to be continued...

. @cobie should bring @const_reborn on @UpOnlyTV new face. new tech. new story. new attitude.

The latest @affine_io #SN120 updates scoring to favor unique AI models and cuts rewards for copies. Only clear outperformers earn big. More TAO for originals. github.com/AffineFoundation/… #Bittensor

Free money? #megaeth

Bittensor $TAO Deregistration Hit List When can a subnet be removed? Only if ALL are true: 1. Out of “immunity” (~6 months grace to get going) 2. NAV > 1 3. It’s the lowest-priced eligible subnet So, which subnets are in danger? 1. #SN38(@dstrbtd_ai): Feb 14, NAV 1.23, 0.00174T 2. #SN47(unknown): Feb 14, NAV 1.17, 0.00176T 3. #SN60(@bitsecai): Feb 14, NAV 1.37, 0.00181T The ROI for aping the right one could be an easy 20% (TAO invested multiplied by NAV). But if deregistration is implemented as described, musical chairs in the final moments could ultimately determine who gets the axe. Is it worth the risk?