I can't tell you how many arguments I get into with some of my prominent Jewish thought leader friends on this issue.
As much as I disagree with
@piersmorgan, he is not an antisemite.
All you have to do is look at how he permanently ended Fuentes' mainstream aspirations in ONE interview, unlike any other interviewer of Fuentes. You must watch that if you are calling Piers an antisemite. He showed the world how it's done in a way NO ONE else did.
And say what you want, but unlike Tucker, Megyn, Gaetz, etc., Piers ALWAYS ALWAYS represents both sides on these debates.
Not only that, but he invites high quality, prestigious Jewish leaders to defend Israel.
The ones who refuse to go on are WRONG and I will say that until the day I die.
When my holocaust surviving grandmother was interviewed for Spielberg's project in 1996, she ended by saying that she hopes her grandchilden will talk about antisemitism "wherever and whenever they can." She did not have that voice when she was thrown into Auschwitz .
I'm sure if she were alive today that Piers would have her on his show. Just as I'm sure that Tucker would not.
Piers DOES host antisemites on his show. So does every media outlet on earth. Unlike almost all of them, he gives space for articulate and brilliant Jews to refute them.
Don't get me wrong, Piers sometimes upsets me very much. And it CAN be dangerous when people like Matt Gatez use Piers to launder their antisemitism by comparing what he says to what Piers says and does, which is insane.
But Piers is not an antisemite. And who is less shy about calling people who are antisemites, antisemites than me?
To my grandmother: I love you, Anyu, and I miss you and all four of you guys who survived that hell. I hope you're with me on all of this.
So Levin can call me a Nazi and you’re fine with it. But if I dare to suggest he’s a propagandist for the Israel govt, which everyone knows he is, I’m antisemitic. Got it. 👍