谁是最可爱的人？

恭喜！中共鹰角网络委员会正式成立！2022年党员人群超过50人，开始筹备成立党总支部，2026年党员人数正式达到100人。海猫络合物任党委副书记。mp.weixin.qq.com/s/cjRmJBMz-… #明日方舟ㅤ #Arknights #アークナイツ

我并不支持，因为 A 起源于 B，所以 A 就永远属于 B，任何后来的发展都不算独立文化这一观点。 你这是典型的稻草人谬误，我压根就不支持这个。这也不是我的观点。 事实上就我所举的几个例子，韩服、泡菜以及K- K-Korean New Year。 我想要表达的是，我反感的是，一个文化起源于中国，但是韩国人用了，就声称这是韩国的文化，更进一步地否定说，这不是中国的文化。 我反对的是这个，我举的例子也举的是这个。你的回答有些扭曲了我的观点。 我不反对韩国人去使用这个文化，但是我反对他们去声称这个是他们自己的文化，并更进一步地声称中国没有这个文化。 事实上，如果不是韩国人总是在互联网上面出警，总是在 X 上面声称中国的汉服是韩国的，更进一步的是，在中国画师画韩、汉服的时候，直接大量的出警，大量的留言谩骂，说这是韩国的东西。 即便是有些韩国人说什么东亚要团结，阴戳戳地画了个图，也会非常恶心地给日本、韩国画上汉字的汉服，给中国换上满清的满服。 你认为这是可以接受的吗？ 他用可以，但是他不能声称这是自己的，更不能更进一步地声称这不是中国的。

台北的政客们显然是习惯了X上网络骂战中常用的逻辑“只要北京生气了，就说明我做对了”。

To make it easier to understand

脑洞

这里头唯一一个来自你中的可能是那个机器人

大したことじゃないと思います。ただたまたま不吉とされる数字だっただけです。私たちの方では「4」と「7」の数字を比較的忌み嫌う習慣があり、特に広東一帯では7に敏感で、広東の他の地域はわかりませんが、

The best answer.

恩和民族乡户籍人口2631人（2018年末），乡里面只有一半是俄族或华俄混血，也就是一千人不到。 行行好，一千个俄罗斯人，你让他们说俄语，他们都嫌麻烦。

The short answer is: yes, the cycle can break. But not in the way Hollywood trained us to expect. It will not be one great clash. It will not be Russia or China riding in as saviors. It will be something slower, uglier, more boring, and more irreversible. Let me break it into pieces. 1. No one is coming to "save" us. First, we have to kill the savior fantasy. Russia, China, Iran, the BRICS, whoever, they are not charities. They are states with their own interests, traumas, and limits. China does not want a direct war with the U.S. over Palestine or Lebanon. Russia does not want a direct war with NATO over Gaza. Iran does not want full-scale war that could tear it apart internally. They push at the edges: Energy deals. Arms to resistance movements. Diplomatic cover. De-dollarization. Infrastructure. They are trying to weaken the empire without triggering Armageddon. So if we are waiting for a clean "counter-empire" to knock Washington and Tel Aviv off the board in one move, we will wait forever. There is no "good empire" coming. There is only the possibility of a world where no single empire can do what the U.S. and Israel are doing now with total impunity. That is the real horizon. 2. What actually keeps this cycle going? U.S.-Israeli impunity rests on three pillars: 1. Material power Dollar system, SWIFT, control over shipping lanes, tech, patents, credit, sanctions, supply chains. 2. Military architecture Bases everywhere, forward deployments, nuclear umbrellas, missile defense, and the training and arming of regional client regimes. 3. Narrative control Western media, platforms, Hollywood, think tanks, NGOs, "experts" who turn massacres into "security dilemmas" and colonization into "conflict." You do not break the cycle with vibes or Twitter outrage. You break it by eroding these three pillars until the cost of empire is higher than the benefits. That is already happening. Slowly. 3. Where Russia, China, and others actually matter. They cannot topple the U.S. and Israel in one gesture. But they can, and already do, make the machine less absolute. A few examples of how, in principle: Economic exits: Every oil contract not denominated in dollars, every payment system that bypasses SWIFT, every port, rail link, and fiber cable that does not run through U.S.-controlled chokepoints makes sanctions weaker as a weapon. Arms and deterrence: When countries under siege can access air defenses, rockets, drones, and cheap asymmetric tools, occupation becomes expensive. That does not liberate the world. But it makes extermination harder and "easy wars" rarer. Institutional alternatives: Regional banks, courts, and security arrangements outside U.S. control mean that if Washington calls you a "terrorist" or freezes your assets, you still have somewhere to breathe. Symbolic breaks: When big states refuse to join sanctions, refuse to parrot Western narratives, and publicly call Gaza a genocide, the U.S. loses its favorite weapon: the illusion that it is "the international community." None of this is glamorous. It is not a cinematic liberation. It is the slow process of turning an empire from a god into a large, dangerous country that other large, dangerous countries can say no to. 4. What will not break the cycle: A single election in America. A new "deal" with Israel. A UN resolution. A heroic speech from a Western politician. These things can reduce suffering at the margins. They do not change the underlying hardware. As long as the dollar, the bases, and the narrative machine stay as they are, any "restraint" is a tactical pause, not a transformation. 5. Where we actually come in? The answer is uncomfortable: part of the work is theirs (states), and part of the work is ours (societies). States outside the empire’s core have to: Build deep South-South economic links so sanctions hurt less. Invest in real industrial capacity, not just exporting raw materials. Create media, universities, and cultural circuits that don’t beg Western approval. Coordinate politically so that when one is attacked, others cannot be quietly picked off or bribed away. Societies, including inside the U.S. and Europe, have to: Refuse the story that their "security" requires someone else’s open-air prison. Turn public opinion into a threat to empire, not a lubricant. Make it politically expensive to arm genocide and call it "self-defense." Keep historical memory alive so every new atrocity cannot be sold as an exception. The cycle of imperialism breaks when: The empire cannot pay for it as easily, Its soldiers no longer want to fight for it, Its own population no longer believes the script, And the rest of the world has enough alternative networks that saying "no" is survivable. We are not there yet. But the direction of travel is not what Washington thinks it is. 6. So is there "any chance"? Yes. The chance is not a miracle event. It is a curve. U.S. and Israeli power are still enormous. But the fear they generate now comes with a visible counter-current: Refusals. Boycotts. Leaks. Alternative alliances. Economic workarounds. New media ecosystems. Empires do not fall the day they become evil. They fall the day the cost of staying in character becomes higher than they can bear. Financially. Militarily. Psychologically. Our job is not to predict the exact moment. Our job is to push that curve. To starve their narratives of legitimacy. To support every real alternative that loosens their grip. To understand that "multipolarity" is not about loving Russia or China or anyone else, but about making it impossible for any one axis to do what the U.S. and Israel are doing now and still call it order. So no, my friend, I don’t believe in a clean rescue by some rival empire. I believe in a long, uneven, already-begun process where the ability to bomb, starve, and colonize with zero consequence shrinks year by year. That is how the cycle breaks. Not with a trumpet. But with a thousand cracks that one day suddenly look like a broken wall.

習近平：祝大家心有所悅、業有所成，萬事皆可期！

Regarding the Russia/China non-veto regarding Gaza peace plan, it is very consistent with the way Russia and China operate diplomatically. Russia (Putin I believe) has even said, for example, that Russia would recognize Kosovo IF SERBIA DID. Russia would also not object to Kosovo joining the UN if Serbia did not object. If Serbia one day elects a government that wants to recognize Kosovo, who is Russia (or China) to stand in the way. China has not said this explicitly, but I think China too would do the same. That is the way it should be. I am sure US would veto any peace plan for Gaza had Russia or China proposed it, even if Israel elected a government that would agree to it. That is not the way it should be. Besides, if Russia/China vetoed the US peace plan, then they'd own Gaza war. I know people hope Russia and China would send their militaries and bomb Israel, but that is both not going to happen, and shouldn't happen, and not for my love of Israel. Problem with the US Empire isn't that it is the US Empire but what it does. If another empire is going to replace them doing the same thing, that doesn't fix anything. All nations should take this into consideration. Don't expect Russia or China to come to save you on an aircraft carrier. If you want a savior on an aircraft carrier, then that is the US for you. Then also expect to be the US's bitch. Maybe some nations prefer this, and that is fine too, but then don't complain you are the US's bitch. This and other examples also show China Russia aren't interested in spreading their "system" and "will" onto others, which is something that US Empire propagandist keep saying trying to tell you that if the US is replaced by China Russia it will be the same thing, so better a US Empire than a China Russia Empire because democracy and freedom. It won't be the same thing. Of course, as it is becoming obvious, it is not clear that many in the so-called pro-"Multipolarity" camp actually honestly believe or understand what Multipolarity, sovereignty and national responsibility means. It's a similar malaise that exists in the Western so-called democracies. Voters don't like a government so they elect a different set of characters who do a few things differently but do not change things fundamentally. And so nothing fundamentally changes. And then the voters elect a new set of characters, who again do more-less the same, just packaged differently. Decades and lifetimes go by. And then they complain nothing changed. Of course it didn't because you never voted for a different system: you just voted for the people who said (said!) they would funnel a few more of the (dwindling) proceeds of the system to you instead of to your neighbor. And it is dwindling because it is fundamentally a corrupt system.

Estonians, Ukrainians, Taiwanese, Japanese—everyone was saying, "Don't mess with me, or I'll unleash the Americans to bite you!"

Last night, the side dish for my luosifen was dog meat, which cost 60 yuan per kilogram. It was very expensive, but delicious and chewy.

中国の主流民意は「もし日本極右本当に戦争を引き起こなら大々的な戦争を歓迎し、戦場を日本全国に選ぶべきだ」という考え方で、この機会を利用して、米軍を日本から完全に追い出すと主張しています。本日の『解放軍報』もまさにこのような見出しで報じています。興味があれば、自分で検索してください。

1945年10月25日，日本代表在台北中山堂签字投降。日本曾对台湾实行殖民统治，犯下罄竹难书的罪行，根本没有资格在台湾问题上说三道四。

Trump is accelerating this process.

The US Federal Reserve did a study where their thesis is that China's GDP growth numbers are accurate. federalreserve.gov/econres/n…