I’m going to unpack some of this. 1. The premise that women are unknowingly carting around a Y (with SRY) is massively over exaggerated. The risk of Surprise SRY is minimal. 2. The risk of Surprise SRY is, however, non-zero. But in reproductively healthy women who have had periods and, more definitively, had kids is as near to zero as one can map in science. 3. That is, if you are a person who got a period before 16yo (ish), who has ever been pregnant or who has had the kind of screens that are offered to women (like cervical screening) without any drama, I’d bet my house you don’t have SRY. 4. If you have proof you have popped eggs and/or seen your ovaries, you would be almost singular (literally in the scientific record, the second case to my knowledge) if you also have SRY, functional or otherwise. If that’s me, with my entirely healthy reproductive system and physiology, I’m writing myself into a paper. 5. If you are born appearing female but actually carting around a Y with an SRY, it will almost always make it’s presence felt during puberty. You won’t menstruate, your GP might then discover unusual anatomy etc. Nobody in the U.K. should be getting Surprise SRY. 6. Ironically, Mums to boys are the most likely confounder (via fetal microchimerism). It should not need to be said that picking up some cells from the baby boy you’ve carried in your belly doesn’t change your sex. The carrying of the baby boy, almost certainly from your own egg, refutes that. 🙄 7. If, despite being an apparently healthy woman, you get a Surprise SRY, that means you’re an interesting woman, not a man. It also means that you won’t be excluded from female sport. Because whatever your genetics, sport is divided on bodies. 8. The lay person’s fascination with genetics and the cultural position that DSDs are “just normal variation” has led a fair amount of even normally-sensible people down a dumb rabbit hole. They are medical conditions that are really rare. 1/20k is a binned frequency that we use in genetics to describe things that are really rare. It’s not a measured number, it’s almost qualitative.

I saw this deviant creep and I think you should too. Because this is TRANS. This is what Stella Creasy wants in the ladies loos with you and your kids.

Listen to the tone of Bruce Jenner’s voice. This is a man talking about something that aroused him, and that still arouses him - namely, the experience of getting caught by his underage daughters while trying on their underwear. This clip should horrify.

RT @sappholives83: The individual who drew these pictures is very clearly fantasizing about the rape, murder, and mutilation of women. This…

BREAKING: Health secretary @jamesmurray_ldn has refused to honour a meeting with the Darlington nurses Bethany Hutchison, President of the Darlington Nursing Union, said: “We were encouraged when @wesstreeting recognised the seriousness of our case and indicated a willingness to meet. That commitment now appears to have been set aside. This issue is not theoretical, it affects frontline staff every day. We are simply asking for clarity, for the law to be applied properly, and for our dignity and safety to be respected. We urge the current Health Secretary to honour his predecessor’s commitment, meet with us, and ensure that what happened in Darlington is never repeated elsewhere in the NHS.” Andrea Williams, Chief Executive of the Christian Legal Centre, said: “At a time when clarity and confidence are needed, the continued failure to ensure compliance with the law on sex and single-sex spaces across the NHS is deeply concerning. This is a snub to the nurses who have fought for years to secure dignity, privacy and safety at work. The Health Secretary should meet them without delay, listen carefully to their concerns, and provide assurances that their right to single sex spaces will be respected." See more breaking in @Daily_Express 👇🏻 express.co.uk/news/uk/221717…

The fact that this man was willing to post this publicly, with his full name attached, says a lot about how untouchable this community thinks they are. These men think they can go around making threats like these, and talking about the thrills they get from “breastfeeding” helpless infants, and harassing women in public restrooms, and no one will do anything about it, because after all, we’re just women. That is a mistake. If they’d played it cool, or been willing to make even the tiniest of compromises, they almost certainly would have won. All they had to do was be nice about it, show a little understanding for women, and a little bit of respect when using our spaces, and society would have continued to treat them as sacred beings who must be pandered to and protected in every way possible. They didn’t do that. Instead, they showed themselves to be depraved, deviant, dangerous predators. They graphically threaten women with rape, torture, and death; carry signs threatening decapitation; physically assaulted women who told them “no”; openly masturbated in the public areas of women’s restrooms; oh, and let’s not forget that they’ve sucked hundreds of thousands of vulnerable children into their toxic death cult to be mutilated and sterilized. Unsurprisingly, most people have had enough of it — and of them. Now the tide has turned. No one cares if they get offended anymore. The backlash is coming, and it’s going to be ugly. These people have spent the last decade or so being pandered to in every possible way, and they’re not taking “no” very well. The temper tantrums are going to be epic. So is the comeuppance.

A woman with bright purple hair came in to my work today. She would have blended with the TQIA community but I still complimented her on her choice of hair colour and pointed out the tone was one of the suffragette colours. She told me she has been teaching her daughter about the Suffragettes and other feminist women and then asked me if I knew women’s rights were under threat and had I heard of a case called Tickle versus Giggle? I said I had, that I found the fact Tickle won despicable, and she launched in to a 10 minute rant about self ID and her disgust with Labor and the Greens, who she used to vote for. I didn’t say anything, just let her vent. Then I invited her to our rally on the 4th of July. I work in a tiny satellite town an hour from Melbourne. If gender ideology has women riled up out here then TERFs have won in the court of public opinion. If Labor wants any chance of staying in government, or if the Libs or One Nation want a crack, they better give women our rights back!

Join me in once again calling for the resignation of @TheLancet editor Richard Horton. Publishing a petition calling for the boycott of the Israeli Medical Association is an absolute disgrace. Medicine should bring physicians together in service of patients, not weaponize professional organizations for political campaigns. Just as it failed the public on the #COVID19 origins debate, The Lancet is again positioning itself as a political actor rather than a medical journal.

It is the work of so many amazing Australian women to finally get “men are not women” on the front page of the newspaper, and absolutely unforgivable that it’s a fight we’ve had to have in the first place. But we’re not giving up until we have our rights back.

This is one of the worst rulings I’ve come across in 18 years as a cop. “A knife wasn’t used, but if it was, it was only to cut her leggings, meaning there was neither violence nor exploitation.” UK followers, is there an unpublicized crack epidemic plaguing your judiciary?

I guess this is one of the drawbacks to being a violent criminal

If any movement has proven how fragile gay rights are it’s the T. Lesbians are in court defending legal protections for homosexuals only because of ‘trans’ activism. Homosexuality is being reframed to include those of the opposite sex because of the T. Who said that in a world of ‘gender’ homosexuality doesn’t really exist / is redundant? Joy Everingham, a ‘trans’ person. Who wrote in the 90s that in a world of ‘gender’ homosexuality would lose all meaning? Martine Rothblatt, a ‘trans’ person. Who said being gay was a ‘consolation prize’ for those who didn’t have the balls to ‘transition’? Juno Dawson, a ‘trans’ person. Who are running workshops for gay men to learn to pleasure female genitalia? ‘Trans’ people. Who are running workshops for males to convince lesbians to date them? ‘Trans’ people. Do are advocating for a sterilising medical pathway for youth, most of whom would simply grow up to be gay? ‘Trans’ people So don’t be baffled, educate yourself - it’s 2026 and you have no excuse for being this ignorant anymore

Giggle has applied to have Giggle v Tickle heard in the High Court. “We have filed for special leave in the High Court… Because the federal court is saying men can be women in law & making women only spaces effectively unisex, we are going to the High Court to challenge that.”

I’m glad you asked. First of all, let’s outline the hallmarks of a social contagion event: - A rapid exponential explosion in numbers. - The sudden appearance of an entirely new patient group - Adolescent girls mostly affected. - Clusters of friends presenting with the same symptom/behaviour All of these are present in the epidemic of young people identifying as trans in the 2010s. Now, the way society normally responds to such events is with an immediate search for the trigger event and the vectors for the contagion. For example, with the bulimia contagion of the 80s, the trigger was found to be media coverage of the disorder. With the outbreak of anorexia in Hong Kong in the 90s, it was the sensational media coverage of a school girl who had collapsed and died on a busy street. With TikTok tics in the 2010s, a young Tourettes sufferer’s YouTube channel was swiftly identified. There are endless examples. In those instances, clinicians didn’t wait around for decades for someone to conduct a reliable study showing that the event was a social contagion. They recognised all the hallmarks and acted. In the case of bulimia though, not nearly fast enough. In the case of the trans contagion, all researchers had to do was take a glance at the cultural messaging of the era. The inflection point coincides precisely with the dawn of the trans rights movement, with media celebration of trans-identified public figures, and trans influencers proliferating rapidly on social media. And those early YouTube influencers actually documented the social contagion on camera for all to see with the How I Knew I Was Trans genre of video — with each young person describing encountering a trans-identified person online and immediately recognising themselves in it and adopting the identity. That’s the social contagion in action. We don’t need studies to show it’s a social contagion. We just need to open our eyes and look at the evidence that is, and always has been, all around us.

All the hallmarks of a social contagion event. There should be questions asked about public money poured into charities - seems to be an overlap between high local spend and high numbers of local children thinking they are trans.

“Childhood–onset deviant sexual arousal is one of the strongest predictors of lifelong offending.” - FBI profiler Candice DeLong This includes little boys who secretly dress in their mother’s or a sister’s clothes. We all know why they do it, and it’s not because they think they’re really girls.

The difference between ‘young activist’ and ‘street thug’ has always been class. A middle class accent convinces a certain type of person that a sledgehammer attack on a police officer was fine, while another type of accident convinces them that flying a flag is racist

This is Samuel Corner, sledgehammer raised, ready to strike the police woman lying at his feet, arm held out in a vain plea for mercy. Samuel Corner is not a martyr nor a "young activist", he's just a common-or-garden thug.

🚨 NEW: Under-16s in the UK will be banned from the following 10 social media apps TikTok YouTube Snapchat Instagram X Reddit Facebook Twitch Kick Threads

🇬🇧 Meanwhile today in London PRIDE Month gives Old Naked Men the chance to parade and cycle around in front of young Kids - all in the name of inclusivity.