Working from home

Appalling 🧵 I want those who champion men in women’s sport to explain why they’re happy to put girls at risk like this.

A man calling himself "Ms Starshine" gets a job at a children's after school club and within FOUR days he offers to kiss an 11 yr old as a "prize" during a game, then dismisses it as "just banter." He then tried to claim discrimination, because, "trans". Female pronouns used for this huge fella throughout this story ffs. Tell me again how this ideology isn't about preying on children? If my kids were at that day centre I'd be pulling them out so fast they'd get whiplash. businessplus.ie/news/transge…

The left’s favorite fallacy: They claim right-wingers ‘use’ attacks like this to further our own ends. No. It’s because of attacks like these, that we ARE right-wing. The idea that we are secretly glad it’s happening so we can “further our agenda” is the most absurd thing I’ve ever heard. We want this to stop. We want our people to be safe. And it’s because of leftist policies that they are not.

Why Craven Cottage getting bullied ? It’s much better than any stadium in US, nobody cares about your fancy shit and soulless crowds.

This is real beauty. Give me Craven Cottage in the middle of Putney, incredible public transport links, walkable distance from dozens of riverside pubs selling proper pints and grub, over the Dunkin’ Donuts Arena in a soulless retail park any and every day of my life.

What is your point? Craven Cottage is the most beautiful stadium in the Prem

Proceeds to post one of the most picturesque stadiums in the country as a negative example. You lot are truly thick as pig shit.

You’re a performative United fan and clearly don’t get it. Craven Cottage is a beautiful stadium on the river thames; it’s literally perfect. It’s got soul, it has character and holds more history in its walls than the entire of the United States.

Very satisfying to see Craven Cottage being universally defended against the Americans. We may be the butt of the joke most of the time (Victoria sponge, posh, no fans etc) but when it comes down to it, we're rightfully respected really.

"Where should we put the rapists and pedophiles? The men will hurt them." "I know! Let's put them in with the women!" "But won't they rape the women?" "Who cares?"

The Bank of England DELIBERATELY FIXED the fake "public vote" to remove ALL historical figures from bank notes & replace them with nature images Freedom of Information requests by the Telegraph reveal the decision to remove historical figures was based on a "focus group" of a mere 119 people The Bank LIED because it previously claimed the decision was based on a "public vote". In truth, however, even this vote was FIXED. Instead of having HISTORY v NATURE, the bank deliberately split the "history" category into 3 sections: historical events, historical figures, architecture & landmarks. That was the only way that "nature" could win. However, of course bank notes always combine at least two of those history categories. For example: Churchill & Parliament or Wellington & Waterloo. The Bank's actions are indefensible and questions should be asked in the House. The Bank of England has clearly been captured by progressive woke ideology. A visit to the Bank of England with its permanent exhibition on slavery makes that clear This is part of the wider war on British history. It's an attempt to create a NEW BRITAIN, based on ridiculous myths that "Diversity Built Britain" and that Britain has always been multicultural. Remember: the Bank of England issued a 50p coin (held aloft by Rishi Sunak) which was imprinted with the nonsensical statement: "Diversity Built Britain" Anyone who lived behind the Iron Curtain will find all of this eerily and scarily familiar. The pulling down of statues, the renaming of streets and schools, the rewriting of history, denigrating heroes, changing bank notes etc....these were all tactics of the communists. Severing the connection between a people and their history is the best way to demoralise a society and prepare them for the imposition of new myths. Me on @GBNews:

You've been granted a strong fortress. Don't betray it.

I’m pretty sure that when Henry Nowak’s father said he did not want his son’s death to create more division, he did not mean: “I want left-wing politicians and commentators to weaponise my grief to shut down debate.” Yet that is exactly what is happening. It’s disgusting to see his words misappropriated as a political battering ram, used to attack anyone who asks difficult questions about the way Henry was treated, and about the anti-white ideology explicitly codified in the public sector. Mr Nowak also said that the police treatment of his dying son was “inhumane and degrading”. We should make sure no other British child is treated the way Henry was.

The core part of the Henry Nowak murder (the part we must not forget and must seriously engage with) is that his killer and family instinctively thought to fabricate a racism narrative because they knew it would give them an immediate advantage and invert the roles at the scene. And it worked exactly as calculated. It has struck a raw nerve because it makes visible in the most repulsive way imaginable what many have long sensed, that accusations of racism have become a powerful, paralysing force in modern Britain eventually leading to a dying boy being sidelined while the system instinctively prioritised accusations of racism.

"Politicising" an event is just code for "drawing conclusions we don't like". What you're meant to do is pretend this stuff is lightning from a clear blue sky, freak happenstance, and that it all just shows how diversity is our real strength. Not point out that our approach to managing the costs of that diversity led police to handcuff an innocent, dying man begging for help.

In a BBC interview, Zia Yusuf was asked "what needs to happen now?", for which he did not have compelling answers. He rightly noted that the religious exemptions on knives must end along with the dismantling of "anti-white racism", but this requires a much more in-depth analysis because we have to recognise that the state the police are in is the culmination of decades of political meddling, demoralisation, centralisation, and bureaucratisation. It may even take decades to reverse. In recent years the police have become a bloated, corporatised unresponsive bureaucracy, that actively deters serious people form joining, in favour of bland functionaries who cannot think for themselves. The force is in the midst of a serious retention crisis meaning that the rank and file have very little in the way of experienced supervision, while the senior ranks shape their forces to a political agenda because political narrative conformity is the path to promotion. What you then have is a neutered police force, afraid of its own shadow, where every decision is micromanaged and scrutinised and officers have to watch what they say and what they think, in public and in private - where even something as basic as professional banter can be career ending. We then have the disgusting spectacle of Chief Constables insulting their own commands by branding their force "institutionally misogynist and racist". Officers then have to work under greater surveillance than the citizens of East Germany. What you then have, is a court system that works on the presumption that the police are racist, and criminals have learned how to exploit liberal anti-racism dogma to insulate themselves from punishment. We've seen exactly the same in schools where teachers are no longer confident of imposing discipline in fear of having a parental complaint to deal with. Anyone with half a brain will not stick around in a dangerous, often tedious job, to then be a political functionary saddled with endless compliance paperwork, when they can make more money and work fewer hours doing virtually anything else. While we very much do need to shitcan the College of Policing and purge wokery from the system, most of the rot predate these political fads, and much of the problem stems from a police force that has lost its way, lost any concept of what they are actually for, and amalgamated to the point where they have little knowledge of the communities they notionally serve. They spend half their shift either driving around a massive patch or waiting in the detention centres to fill out forms. They are glorified delivery boys and taxi drivers, occasionally expected to be paramedics, social workers, riot control and community outreach worker. With the system as rotten as it is, nobody serious would want to be a copper, which is why we're seeing police who are too young, too naïve, and too indoctrinated - lacking supervision and too stupid to be let out on their own. You then get to a point where the arrival of moronic plod stands to exacerbate already tense and dangerous situations - which is exactly what's happened in the Nowak case. What you need is seasoned grown-ups and a system that has their backs. You can't have that if the ground troops have their every decision second guessed and evaluated for political conformity. I was recently arrested for posting a meme on X. What staggered me was not so much the arrest. It was that nobody in the chain of command questioned the stupidity of driving halfway across the county in the middle of the night to put someone in a cage for posting an anti-Hamas meme. The entire force is intellectually subnormal and nobody had the gumption to push back on it, probably because it wasn't worth the political argument. That's how we got where we are today, with jobsworth coppers too afraid to put their heads above the parapet. As such, when a politician is asked "what needs to happen now", if we are to take them seriously, we need better answers than the ones given by Zia Yusuf.

Those pale hands in cuffs. The blue gloved hands. The derisive "I don't think you have, mate" as they flip him over like a piece of lost luggage at Heathrow amidst so many strangers. The images say so much more about Britain than any number of erudite articles in The Spectator ever could, and all the more damning they are for it, too. It is ironic that Britain's political class preoccupy themselves endlessly with notions of "privilege" and "rights" to this or that, even as they deploy such verbiage as a precursor to taking things away from you. The liberal left calls you privileged so that they may loot your belongings, your money, your property more effectively — augmented with the appropriate degree of justification and self-righteousness. They call you "racist" that they may elect to disavow you of the protections one comes to expect in civilised societies when it suits them, "everyone has freedom of speech - yet not freedom from consequences" prattles that smug liberal in the newspaper. Well now we see what those consequences are, do we not? Beneath the Liberal skinsuit lurks another assumption too: that somehow, if he had been racist, it would've in some way excused what happened. Clearly the culprit was well-versed in the implications of this paragraph of the Yookay's modern social contract. Yet in the end all it took for Henry to lose something far more than a privilege, but a fundamental right - that of the presumption of innocence before being proven guilty, was for someone to call him "racist". I see precious little evidence of Henry's rights or privileges being respected in this photo. In fact none of our or Henry's state-ordained privileges are quite as strong as we thought. All it took for the state to deny him the last and most precious privilege of all - one final roll of the dice that he may receive treatment, perchance to live - was for someone to cast that magic spell: to call him a "racist". Thus instead of receiving medical treatment, he was manhandled and dragged across the gravel drive as he expended his last remaining breaths attempting to explain to the officers that he had been stabbed. The social contract (our relationship to government, what we give versus what we get, the tradeoffs of individual freedom versus public safety) was supposed to be designed first and foremost to protect people. We are supposed to have police so that the general public may be protected from the horrors routinely meted out on them nowadays, whether in the form of Henry Nowak in this instance, or in the form of the grooming gangs more broadly. Instead the political class opts to circle the wagons around themselves first and foremost and throw ordinary people to the wolves instead. They gag whistleblowers and bureaucratise the process of concealing the evidence to protect their reputations and preserve their right to collect their pensions undisturbed wherever possible. So in the end, this isn't a social contract at all: it's a pair of Latex gloves on a pair of pale young hands, ears echoing to a smirking "I don't think you have, mate" as everything fades to black.

There's no more accurate a metaphor for the West than slowly bleeding to death by the hand of barbarians while corrupt authorities tie our hands behind our back.

This Kirpan angle is a red herring. The important factors are (1) the police’s attitude to racism accusations (2) the murderer cynically leveraging that and (3) the collusion of the family. All three of these are indicative of wider and more serious problems than Kirpans.

This is the essence of it. Law enforcement were inclined to believe the mob ; rather than help the victim. They were inclined to believe an entire group of people who were coordinated rather than the single, vulnerable, dying individual ; they were inclined to see a gang of people as “the real victims” rather than the victim It was because the victim couldn’t speak well (he was dying) and could barely move that they targeted him and handcuffed him. It’s bizarre to put the dying, incapacitated person in handcuffs and not listen to him and deny his last words, mocking him for saying he was stabbed; but an entire system had led to this. Years of training not to help the individual, not to assist and to listen to the people standing over him, the perpetrator Until the system retrains people to protect individuals and protect the vulnerable this will keep happening. In the grooming gang cases the same thing happened. Young girls were dismissed and the masses of older male perpetrators were seen as victims and listened to. There is the case of the recent judge praising the teen rapists in another case, rather than care for the girl victims. It’s always the same pattern of a system that sees the quiet, vulnerable individual as the enemy and prefers the gang