@Mintlayer powers @SidqFinance’s on-chain Shariah certificates—issued, renewed, and revoked as verifiable #NFTs—backed by 1,284 certificates across 41 jurisdictions, 14 scholars (3-of-5 multisig), and a $300M AUM I1 fund, making compliance fully transparent and auditable on-chain

This is what it means in graphic terms… Institutional Grade rails will power the economy across layers. Everything will be a token

I didn’t think you’d need me to say it, however, everyone should understand that we are moving into one of the greatest shifts in macroeconomics, finance, and wealth creation in history. The way we transact, accumulate wealth, and crucially, interact through our AI agents in the emerging agentic economy is transforming everything. Postulates that once held in trad finance no longer apply, and cannot be directly translated here. The TradFi paradigm is broken forever. What’s emerging is a future with far fewer horizontal bureaucratic layers and far more agile, secure, compliant, and trustworthy infrastructure designed to serve institutions at scale. Contrary to the pure DeFi dreams many of us started with, we’re heading into a globally hyper connected (and more coordinated) economy. The only means of seamless participation across all layers? TOKENS! So yes, you’re spot on, everything will be tokenized. The bigger opportunity belongs to those with enough foresight to invest, build, and position themselves as masters of the rails, from the foundational layer of Energy all the way to the top. (Not Investment advice, but, if you know, you know)

@mintlayer x.com/i/status/2066015544499…

Everyone asks if quantum computers can break Bitcoin. Nobody runs the numbers on what it would actually cost. The answer: ~$1.15M in electricity. ~$7.9 trillion in hardware. The math reframes the threat entirely. mintlayer.com/blog/quantum-c…

Under the Clarity Act, the SEC and CFTC finally have defined lanes. No more jurisdictional limbo. No more legislating by enforcement.

A few months ago, I started talking about RWI (real world identity) and I remember, a lot of people in the space said that I was too influenced by SciFi… I wonder if we’re still thinking the same. From my side, I’m happy to report that despite the criticism, I believe that’s the next frontier, and we’ve been working on it x.com/0xOptimus/status/20656…

When I was a child, I remember fighting for my rights to own dolls. My grandpa believed it was not necessary, and my every request would be met with a new Lego set. When I read your post, it made me smile, and remember those days. Today, I understand what he was trying to do, and I’ve come to appreciate it… however, I’ve also come to realize, that to build useful things, we must develop empathy. A product developed by means of play and pattern recognition as data points, ensures we understand the need, empathy allows us to make up for market fit, adoption and retention. (No dolls were harmed in the process)

Some of you, in every word, reveal nothing but weak character. I sometimes wish to stop you and say: you need not declare against yourself so loudly. Yet who am I to shield you from the natural consequences of your own company, and the heavy weight of an overinflated sense of self importance?

The rules for digital assets exist. We just have to make them law. That is what the Clarity Act does.

Al Hana Food Trading, and Excellent Oasis supply to us for the Sanctuaries. I’ll DM you the numbers. Amazon has become very expensive for bulk orders

Nothing else to add here. I hope it’s clear now for the people in the back

The Clarity Act draws a clear line between digital assets that are securities and those that are commodities. We've needed that line for a decade.

Do you Fund female founders?

The blockchain industry has spent years measuring success through TPS, TVL, and user growth. But as institutions begin exploring tokenization and on-chain finance, another metric is becoming increasingly important, and that's TRUST. Who can provide the security, transparency, and settlement assurances needed for long-term adoption? As the industry matures, trust will likely become a stronger differentiator than raw performance metrics. This is we, at Mintlayer.com, are taking a Bitcoin-first approach, utilizing one of the most battle-tested networks in the industry to support the next generation of tokenized assets and financial applications. The next wave of adoption will be driven more by confidence.

Financial freedom is an American value. Digital assets are its newest expression. We should be the ones protecting it.

As the world counts down to the FIFA World Cup 2026, development at Mintlayer HQ remains in full swing. The latest GitHub update was recorded just 19 hours ago: github.com/mintlayer The shipping never stops.

The Clarity Act takes the side of everyday Americans. This historic legislation brings digital assets out of the shadows and into a system that is safer, fairer, and more transparent!

As a founder, I’ve spent years building institutional grade Bitcoin, and AI infrastructure. I’m one of very few female founders in this niche globally, but you wouldn’t know it from reading Forbes . This week they gave the cover story to an escort servicing Silicon Valley’s AI engineers, filing it under #Tech, giving it the photo shoot, the distribution, the cultural weight. That editorial choice says something specific about what kind of woman in tech is considered worth the spotlight. Here’s what troubles me about the framing. The woman profiled is described as “intelligent, well-read, conversant in AI and crypto and biohacking.” She studied, built skills, and the story Forbes chose to tell is that she used all of that to service the men building the industry rather than building alongside them. Female founders currently receive roughly 2% of global venture funding. Women are close to half the global population. In the UAE alone, 64% of university graduates are women. So what exactly are we telling those women, and the girls watching them, about where their intelligence and ambition are supposed to lead? Unfortunately, what nobody talks about honestly, is what happens to the technology itself when women aren’t in the room as founders and decision-makers. Facial recognition systems that perform significantly worse on women and people of color were built without adequate female representation in the teams designing them. AI hiring tools trained on historical data have systematically downgraded applications from women. These are not hypothetical risks, but are documented systemic failures that exist, because the people building the systems didn’t reflect the full range of people those systems would affect. That’s the real cost of this pipeline problem, and it compounds every year we celebrate the wrong stories. I want to be clear: this is not about the woman profiled. Her choices are her own, and that’s not the conversation. The real conversation is about what Forbes chose to amplify, and what that choice signals to every girl right now deciding whether a career in technology is worth the fight. If the message is that the realistic path for women to break through in AI is to monetize proximity to male founders rather than become one, then the industry will keep looking exactly like it does today. That’s not inevitable, but a choice, and media is part of making it.

I've spent years building toward this moment. The Clarity Act is the most consequential financial legislation of this generation and we are going to get it done.