Joined January 2022
160 Photos and videos
No Options yet for $SPCX 🥱 😂
113
All eyes on $SPCX
261
DooByte retweeted
Many are asking why is SpaceX, $SPCX, NOT trading yet? Here's exactly how the IPO process works and when the shares will be available to trade (Bookmark this): The IPO was quoted at 9:50 AM ET and was expected to begin trading at 10:00 AM ET, but that does NOT guarantee shares will trade at that time. Before trading begins, Nasdaq must complete a price-discovery auction where buy and sell orders are collected and matched. At around 9:50 AM ET, "first indications" came out which are essentially a "gauge" of where the stock will open. The first indications on $SPCX came in at $175/share, or a ~30% premium to the $135/share IPO price. During this process: 1. Orders are entered, but no trades occur yet 2. Nasdaq continuously updates the indicative opening price 3. The opening price is adjusted until supply and demand are balanced 4. Only then does the opening auction occur and the first trade print For major IPOs, delays are common such as Google in 2004 and Meta in 2012 which saw their first trades over 2 hours after the US market opened. We expect the SpaceX IPO to open for trading within the next 60 minutes. Buckle up for a historic day.
214
579
5,771
1,007,125
Always cheering for a Dubai kid! Lessgoo @aadit_palicha
Zepto’s just filed to go public in India for ~$7-10B! All in just 5yrs by 2 Stanford dropouts. What an absolutely incredible story! Last year, — Revenue 2x’d to ~$2.4B — Loss margins halved (-26%), looks like a path to profitability — ~50M users and rev/user growing Thats the scale and market cap of Swiggy, which had a 8yr head start, in half the time. Zomato, with a 13yr head start, is at $24B. Looks like 10min grocery delivery is here to stay.
28
Yeah wrecked my gut totally Always avoid sucralose people!
Big protein is trying to hide something
20
Mahjong won't be a thing until @srthkahuja makes a reel on it.
5
Everyone's focused on using codex Claude for themselves but no one's focused on teams. Shared AI usage can be a huge productivity unlock. @Copilot you are so well positioned to make this happen
Introducing: Tasklet for Teams. One place for your team's agents, connections, apps, and knowledge. Scale productivity without adding headcount.
41
Erm the Fitbit air isn't any less bulkier than the Charge 6, like barely. With the Charge 6 you get live HR, GPS, Google Wallet, etc. The Charge 6 is a heavily underrated product. Even the battery life is comparable. #FitbitAir The air needs to be about half it's size
204
Next level rubbernecking
Video shows a car accident in Kuwait City as missiles flew overhead. Kuwait’s military said it intercepted incoming drones and missiles after Iran launched attacks targeting US installations in Kuwait and Bahrain.
31
9月発売予定のApple初の折りたたみiPhoneの最も鮮明な動画が中国の工場から流出しました。

Community note
この動画はダミーモデルで、Appleの工場から流出した実際のプロトタイプではありません。 x.com/MajinBuofficia… notebookcheck.net/Foldable-iPhon…
332
418
4,890
3,533,423
Hey @androidcentral - do you have any reviewers who are WhatsApp users? Would you care to review this app: play.google.com/store/apps/d…

44
When reset @thsottiaux ? I'm moving to low to save my 1% remaining rate limits and try to stretch to 31st May
3
Hahahaha 🤣😂
Ferrari just unveiled its first EV, Luce, designed by Jony Ive. And this is how you charge it💀
5
Using AI collaboratively will be the next massive unlock. @AnthropicAI @OpenAI @MicrosoftAI
13
I don't buy this Don't look at others lifestyles and worry because they're all maxed out on leverage Even if I were to leverage max myself I wouldn't be able to get that lifestyle Leveraging also requires a base level of income.
“Where does everyone get the money?” I had coffee this week with a smart guy. Good job. Good income. Normal guy. Halfway through the conversation, he put down his (overpriced) cappuccino and said something a lot of people are thinking but are too embarrassed to say out loud: Tom, I feel like I am the loser. My feed is full of people buying investment properties, flying to luxury resorts, upgrading cars, posting rooftop dinners, perfect vacations, perfect kitchens, perfect lives. And me? I am trying to figure out if we can afford soccer practice for the kids this month. Where is everyone getting the money? Here is the answer most people do not want to hear. A lot of them are not rich. They are leveraged. The shiny new car in the driveway? Loan. The luxury vacation? Credit card debt. The perfect house? Massive mortgage hiding behind granite countertops. The designer lifestyle? Monthly payments. A lot of people are not winning. They are acting and performing. Real wealth in 2026 is not the newest car. Real wealth is sleeping at night. Real wealth is not being owned by the bank. Real wealth is having cash flow, discipline, investments, and zero need to impress strangers on Instagram. Get out of the fake rich Olympics. Build quiet wealth. That is the cheat code.
24
Lol just say Jevons Paradox, every podcast about AI mentions it
this was probably my favorite read on AI this year. kudos to Dan for writing it his core point: more AI = more work for humans, not less this seems to be universally true: AI is helping everyone get more done, but me and everyone i know is working more than ever, not less here's why that's happening: 1. AI is really good at the stuff humans used to be good at. writing, coding, design, research. it can do all of it now, fast and cheap 2. so everyone starts using it. the person in customer support is shipping code. the engineer is writing blog posts. the marketer is making videos. way more stuff gets made 3. but everyone is using the same AI. so the stuff it makes all starts to look the same 4. when everything looks the same, people get bored of it. they can smell it a mile away. it becomes worthless 5. so now what's valuable is the opposite. stuff that doesn't look like everything else. stuff that's actually good. stuff that fits the exact moment 6. and the only one who can do that is a human who knows what they're doing. someone who can look at what the AI made and say "this part is good, this part is bad, do it again like this" 7. that human now has way more work to do than before. because the AI is making 10x more stuff, and all of it needs a human to make it actually good you can see this play out every time a new AI model drops. people panic that the jobs are gone. but the same thing happens every time. the AI gets really good at the part of the job that used to be hard. that part becomes easy and cheap. and the humans who used to do it move up to a new harder part the AI can't do yet example: writing a decent blog post used to be a skill. now AI can do it in 10 seconds. so the human job moved up a level. now the skill is knowing which blog post to write, who it's for, and whether the one the AI wrote is actually any good the bar keeps moving up. the humans keep moving with it even when AGI shows up, someone still has to tell it what to work on and check if the work is any good the easiest way to see why is to think about a toddler for a second. a toddler can't write code, can't summarize a spreadsheet, can't pass a single benchmark. the AI beats him at everything but the toddler wants stuff. he wants to poke the balloon with a fork. he wants to see if you'll laugh when he throws his food. he comes up with his own little experiments all day long the AI doesn't want anything. it just sits there until someone tells it what to do that gap doesn't close. the AI can do the work. but a human still has to be the one who wants something done in the first place, and who decides if what came back is actually what they wanted at Every (Dan's company), they've automated everything they possibly can. and they have more human work to do than ever. that's the proof the people who win this are the ones who get good at directing the AI. > telling it what to work on > checking if the work is any good > and pointing it at problems nobody has figured out how to solve yet that's the new skill. not doing the work yourself, but rather knowing what work is worth doing and whether the AI actually did it well read the full piece, it's worth it
19
Taking this trajectory and stretching it out are we going to write full stack apps to explain to AI what needs to be done and how?
May 18
continuing my HTML era, I had so much fun talking with Claire at Code w/ Claude about staying in the loop with long running agents
1
29
Wtf I gotta read Dune
Dune is such a good story. Like if you've seen the movies you don't even know. The movies are bastardizations of the STARTING POINT of how nuts things get in dune. How about a 12 year old child merging with sand worm larvae to become an immortal with access to been gessarit generational memory of all of human history? How about technological advancements so cutting edge that they cut off prescience itself? How about reincarnating your flesh in living birthing tanks and then awakening your memories so you're actually just immortal? God damn Dune is fucking cool. It's not grimdark, it's more psychotechno with a religious flare. So fucking cool. The gene gessarit are super human genius prescient visionaries with big mommy milkers and genetics so finely tuned that the Lady Jessica and a witch 6000 years later look identical, and also have the memories of Jessica and every other witch to recall. Paul is a whiney bitch compared to Leto II. And it's not really about the action, it's about the implications politics and schemes. This is why Frank writes about the doctors betrayal in the first chapters. It's not about plot twists. The fun is scheming with all parties involved. It's basically Star Trek but if it were actually cool and about brutal realism, human natural law and genetic preservation instead of rainbows and unicorns space communism.
1
1
32
unless you're doing complete overhauls or really detailed plans, codex 5.5 low is more than enough to get a lot done rate limits last forever like this!
1
44