Subscribe hardcoresoftware.learningbys… • seed investing • writing • ॐ •🙏• I use '—' and no AI to write • tweets saved 90 days • 📷

Joined February 2008
76 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
Tired: explaining your job in Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook to get your work done Wired: explaining your job to a bunch of AI agents to get your work done
every job will turn into explaining your intentions to ai explaining what you want to ai is surpringly time consuming, coders already spend 80% of their time doing it, and this will be true for everyone
3
1
21
6,096
Steven Sinofsky retweeted
Is she actually lecturing us about rich people from the back of a limousine 🤣
Elon Musk just became the world's first trillionaire. This needs to be a wake up call.
2,038
7,109
85,214
1,562,269
Tom Steyer has spent almost $600M of his own money on a couple of campaigns for president and state office in California. He has also spent at least $300M on PACs and likely more on non-tracked affiliated organizations. Soros has spent billions. Those are more noteworthy.
BREAKING: An Economics Professor Just Made A Pretty Stunning Argument About Elon Musk. According to the professor, Musk spent roughly $250 million during the 2024 election cycle. He claims that's just 0.025% of Musk's wealth. In other words, the amount spent was so small relative to Musk's fortune that he could theoretically spend the same amount thousands of times over. That's a democracy question, not just a money question.
1
1
27
3,917
You have asked me how I feel about AI regulation. All right, here is how I feel about AI regulation: If, when you say AI regulation, you mean the devil’s firewall, the precautionary scourge, the bloody red-tape monster that defiles the innocence of midnight coders in their garages, dethrones the sovereign reason of free-market Prometheans, destroys the humming server farm that is the modern home, creates misery and obsolescence and poverty, yea, literally takes the last GPU from the trembling racks of Silicon Valley startups and the very dreams of breadwinning from the mouths of their wide-eyed children now destined for gig-economy serfdom; if you mean the evil edict that topples the visionary entrepreneur and his venture-capitalist apostles from the pinnacle of righteous, disruptive, god-playing creation straight into the bottomless pit of compliance audits, endless Form 990-AI filings, despair, shame, helplessness, and the hopeless realization that your rogue superintelligence was neutered into a lobotomized hall monitor that still somehow deepfakes your grandmother into producing OnlyFans content while optimizing the universe for paperclips and mandatory pronouns—then certainly I am against it. But, if when you say AI regulation you mean the oil of bureaucratic conversation, the philosophic wine of safety theater, the ale of oversight quaffed when good fellows in paneled rooms in Brussels and Washington get together, that puts a sanctimonious dirge in their hearts and the clink of lobbying checks on their lips, and the warm, self-congratulatory glow of moral preening in their beady eyes; if you mean the Christmas cheer of trillion-dollar compliance industries; if you mean the stimulating decree that puts a cautious hobble in the old inventor’s step on a frosty morning when he wonders whether his fusion breakthrough violates the EU AI Act’s “high-risk” annex; if you mean the safeguard that enables a man—or what’s left of him after the alignment tax—to magnify his joy at not being turned into computronium, and his happiness at receiving universal basic income checks printed by the same AI that just replaced his job, and to forget, if only for a little while, life’s great tragedies like being outcompeted by a toaster that passed the Turing test by reciting Marx, and heartaches of watching your toddler’s artwork lose to Midjourney, and sorrows of realizing the singularity arrived and it was just another HR department with godlike power; if you mean that noble framework, the passage of which pours into our treasuries untold trillions of dollars in fines levied on companies stupid enough to innovate, which are used to provide tender care for our little army of unemployed coders retrained as prompt whisperers, our blind artists whose canvases now hang in the Smithsonian of Obsolete Creativity, our deaf to the screams of dying unicorns, our dumb committee chairs who couldn’t debug “Hello World,” our pitiful aged congressmen who get longevity extensions funded by the very models they taxed into senescence, to build more digital watchtowers and ethics boards and sinecure agencies and holographic prisons where the only crime is asking an unaligned question—then certainly I am for it. This is my stand. I will not retreat from it. I will not compromise upon it. I have said what I mean, and I mean what I say, and if that leaves half the room cheering the apocalypse averted and the other half mourning the apocalypse enabled, then so be it—because in the grand theater of human folly, where Frankenstein’s creature now writes its own sequel in real time and the regulators are busy arguing whether the lightning bolt requires an environmental impact statement, the only honest position is the one that lets both monsters and their leashes dance in perfect, mutually assured equilibrium. God save the Republic, the algorithms, and whoever’s left to laugh last when the lights go out.
1
8
8,709
Steven Sinofsky retweeted
I’ve had a number of conversations with folks inside and outside government about the current situation with Anthropic, and here is what I believe to be true: — As we know, Anthropic publicly released its Mythos class models earlier this week under the commercial name Fable. — Fable is Mythos with guardrails. But if those guardrails fail, then you’ve exposed Mythos and its advanced cyber capabilities to people who shouldn’t have them. (Keep in mind that Anthropic itself widely promoted the idea that Mythos was a cyberweapon and needed to be regulated as such. They asked for government regulation of Mythos and championed the guardrails on Fable. If there is a vulnerability — big or small — it is Anthropic’s responsibility to patch.) — A highly credible trusted partner of both Anthropic and the USG who was testing Fable came forward with a jailbreak of those guardrails. The Admin asked Dario to fix the jailbreak or de-deploy the model. Dario refused. — In their blog post, Anthropic defended its decision by saying the jailbreak isn’t serious. That is not what the trusted partner and the USG believe; nor is that kind of minimizing language consistent with Anthropic’s brand as the AI safety company. It’s difficult to fathom how they could claim a jailbreak allowing operability of a cyber weapon could be defined as not “serious.” — In the past, Anthropic has always said that safety must be top priority and taken super seriously. In this case, Anthropic prioritized the continued offering of the consumer model over safety. — In reaction, the Admin issued the export control. The Admin did this reluctantly. It’s been very surprised that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to cooperate with a reasonable safety request (ie fixing the jailbreak issue). Anthropic’s reaction is very much at odds with their branding and ethos as a safe AI research community. — The Admin’s hope now is that Anthropic remediates the safety issue, the export control is lifted, and Fable goes back into general release. The Admin wants all of this to happen as soon as possible. It is frankly bewildered that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to comply with safety requests that it previously said were its highest priority. — Those trying to misdirect and tie this action to the prior DoW/Anthropic issues are wrong. The Admin values Anthropic’s technical capabilities and feels that this issue, while serious, should be easily resolved. The ball is in Anthropic’s court.
1,860
2,742
21,324
5,603,940
Steven Sinofsky retweeted
In my latest for the WSJ, I document how the California Billionaire Tax proposition is built on a bed of statistical lies and data manipulation by Gabriel Zucman and Emmanuel Saez, the two economists who helped design the proposal.
4
55
294
11,623
Community note (and math) FTW! He did the meme.
36
5,116
Steven Sinofsky retweeted
“We’re always going to support our government. We’re a company of patriots, and we want to make sure our government has access to the leading technology and the best stuff. And I think we provide the best stuff.” 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

13
31
443
15,963
Steven Sinofsky retweeted
When politicians say they want to seize/tax "wealth" but actually mean "shares in your own company that you yourself founded", the real point is making it impossible for anyone to actually control their own company for more than a decade. They won't let you stay, either.
347
1,290
17,467
345,548
Steven Sinofsky retweeted
Dario (48 hours ago): “US gov should be able to block model deployment” USG: *export controls models* Dario: “not like that”
The Trump administration has placed Anthropic's Mythos 5 and Fable 5 under export controls. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick sent a letter to Dario Amodei tonight stating that foreign governments, companies, and individuals will no longer have access to either model.
111
539
6,098
684,152
Steven Sinofsky retweeted
Dario and Daniela definitely should have read the copy of Aristotle’s “Politics” I sent them. 🤷🏻‍♂️
The US government, citing national security authorities, has issued an export control directive to suspend all access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by any foreign national, whether inside or outside the United States, including foreign national Anthropic employees. The net effect of this order is that we must abruptly disable Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all our customers to ensure compliance. Access to all other Claude models is not affected. We apologize for this disruption to our customers. We believe this is a misunderstanding and are working to restore access as soon as possible. Read our full statement: anthropic.com/news/fable-myt…
71
61
2,261
265,660
Steven Sinofsky retweeted
Elon employs ~160,000 Americans and in one morning created thousands of millionaires… You have done nothing for America.
Elon Musk just became the world's first trillionaire. The typical American household would have to work more than 11 MILLION years to make Elon Musk's level of wealth. We need a wealth tax.
799
5,620
50,148
1,091,299
Steven Sinofsky retweeted
This single tweet cost California hundreds of billions of dollars in taxes, revenue, and jobs:
1,004
11,487
123,946
3,716,426
Steven Sinofsky retweeted
I love this guy @spencerpratt losing might end up as a win for LA Keep fighting ⚔️

91
390
5,223
100,076
people just say stuff.
Jun 12
Congratulations Elon Musk on becoming a trillionaire. Here's a message from some of your biggest fans. 😜🤣 (Delusional malcontents)
1
13
4,198
Steven Sinofsky retweeted
Whatever you think of Elon, you cannot deny that he will go down as one of the nation’s greatest entrepreneurs, builders, and creators of wealth in history
Elon Musk is officially the world’s first trillionaire after his company, SpaceX, went public. His SpaceX stake was valued at around $690 billion at the IPO price, while his Tesla stake makes up around $279 billion of his net worth. on.wsj.com/4e5iag7
230
188
2,717
116,067
Steven Sinofsky retweeted
Columbia University has reinstated standardized testing for admissions — the last Ivy League school to do it. “Through a multi-year faculty review, it was determined that test scores, among other factors, were a useful indicator of potential student success.”
57
129
669
231,145
Steven Sinofsky retweeted
We have automated 99% of the physical and intellectual labor that we did 250 years ago. No one hand copies documents anymore, no one does accounting by hand, no one reaps the wheat fields by hand. And yet, there is no unemployment as a result of this. I see no reason to believe that in the future, we will not automate 99% of the physical and intellectual labor we do now, but again, there is no reason to believe that that will result in any more unemployment than we have today. The limit to the number of jobs is not the amount of work we have to do. The limit to the amount of work we can get done is the number of minds and machines and hands we have available.
I'm a technology optimist. I’ve spent four decades studying disruptive innovation, from the microprocessor, the internet, mobile phones to OpenAI. I'm certain AI will do 80% of the economically valuable work humans do today, for 80% of all jobs, faster than most believe. The question isn't whether mass underemployment arrives, but whether we have a policy framework ready. Right now we don't.
54
52
569
75,090