Red flags that someone is bad at debating (or has already lost): 1) Hurling personal insults instead of engaging with the actual points. 2) Repeating the same insults when they have nothing new to say. 3) Declaring themselves (or their opinion) smarter / more correct than everyone else, without justification. 4) Failing to construct even basic logical reasoning — contradictions, non-sequiturs, etc. 5) Leaning heavily on subjective assumptions and treating them as objective truth. These are some of the most reliable indicators — when logic runs dry, ego and emotion usually take over.

This is how Lidar vs Pure Vision self driving, where pure vision is 10% better each OTA.

The fact that Elon has done far more good for humanity, and this person doesn't know, is pure ignorance and uneducated.

You should start a water company, bee farm company and sustainable energy company. Why demand others do the things for you instead of doing yourself. Hold your government accountable, not dictating others what to do.

This is an appealing design

如果X是中国的APP，会发生什么？

Every dollar Elon Musk has made is traceable. Every product sold, every service rendered, every government contract awarded, every share of stock bought or sold. It’s all on the record. You, on the other hand, haven’t built a company, invented a product, or created anything people willingly pay for. You’ve spent the last 14 years collecting a $174,000 Senate salary. Yet somehow you managed to buy a luxury D.C. condo, a $4 million Victorian mansion in Cambridge, and saw your net worth balloon by 150% to $12 million. Everyone knows where Musk’s money came from. The same can’t be said for yours.

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 En Inglaterra, una periodista fue a un barrio de musulmanes a decir que ellos son PACIFICOS y al rato apareció una banda de musulmanes a decirles que se vayan porque los iban a matar☠️ País destruido por la agenda 2030.

Within ~5 years, probably ~5 times as many satellites as rest of world

Yeah

Congratulations @ElonMusk. Thanks to SpaceX's IPO, he's the first Trillionaire. He didn't TAKE money from anyone. He CREATED wealth. He launched satellites that connect even the poorest, most remote parts of the world. Our world needs more MAKERS like Musk; fewer TAKERS like:

When you have to put down your personal wealth to solve a problem, you are incentivized to solve it. When you confiscate money from others to solve a problem, you are incentivized to keep it unsolved.

AOC is wealthy enough to fund all the needy people to see a doctor.

"If this country is going to allow one man to be worth $1 trillion..." Allow? What are you, his fucking owner? A trillion dollars doesn't come from your permission. It comes from millions of voluntary decisions by investors, customers, employees, and business partners. And "fair share" always means the same thing: Someone else should produce so I can live off them. The socialist definition of fairness is that the more productive you are, the less belongs to you. They're not opposed to exploitation. They're opposed to being expected to produce. They're not opposed to slavery. They just think the productive should be the slaves.

History's first trillionaire is a guy who catches rockets out of the sky with chopsticks and beams internet to every dead zone on the planet. Same guy ships cars that drive themselves, humanoid robots for the factory floor, brain chips that let paralyzed people move a cursor with pure thought, and an AI running on a supercomputer his team stood up in months instead of years. And the people crashing out about his net worth are doing it on the app he owns. The same app governments spent years trying to censor. You cannot legislate a rocket into orbit.

No one on this planet is doing more than Elon Musk to end poverty. That’s the thing about capitalism: it makes EVERYBODY wealthier. Also, these idiots do not understand that Elon is a trillionaire on paper only, the SEC prohibits him from selling his shares willy-nilly, and if he could legally have liquidity on those shares, the share price and the company itself would collapse literally within minutes. Why are Marxists so stupid?

Finally a sincere mind rather than a bunch of financially illiterate talking about how Elon shouldn't be a trillionaire and is evil.

这大概是商业史上最浪漫的一次IPO了， 史上最大IPO的现场，我被老马这段演讲感动哭了，@elonmusk 你个大帅比太会煽情了😭 马斯克没聊市值，没讲业绩， 他说我们要带你去火星， 字面意义上的你， 我觉得就老马一句话，盖过了所有财报和估值， 他一再强调不是我们要送宇航员去火星， 是你，字面上的你，无论你是谁，我们都会带你去。 从前太空是国家和精英的自留地， 这是第一次，普通人被放进了主语里， 平复下心情，我觉得这其实不是马斯克空口的情怀渲染，其实就是被可重复火箭和规模化生产逼出来的必然， 因为老马早就知道，成本不落到普通人够得到的位置，整个商业模式就跑不通。 这次750亿美元募资不是终点， 只是一个正循环的起点， 更多资金可以推动技术快速迭代，更低成本换更多参与者，用在地球上赚的钱，来铺人类去火星的路。 我们正在亲眼见证一件事， 一家私人公司，用资本市场的规则，推着整个人类物种往前走！

It blows my mind how many people are complaining that Elon became the first trillionaire. First, most of it is paper wealth tied to equity in his companies. He could not turn it into real cash without dumping shares, which would crash the price and shrink his net worth massively. “But he can borrow against his shares.” Sure he can. That does not make him richer. A loan still has to be paid back, the shares stay pledged as collateral the entire time, and if the price drops he gets margin called. He’s just leveraging paper. You would be much richer holding $1 million in cash than owning 25% of a company worth $4 million, even though both equal $1 million on paper. Second, come on. He actually changed the world. A lot of these people complaining drive electric cars because they care about emissions. Those cars would not be mainstream if Elon had not built Tesla. Millions of people in rural and remote areas have internet because of Starlink. SpaceX is the only reason NASA is not still paying Russia to send astronauts to the ISS. You can hate the man. You can hate his politics. But pretending he is not one of the most consequential entrepreneurs of our lifetime is just dishonest.

Illegal immigrants are illegal in the first place, there are many people who have a hard time understanding it. If they support illegal immigrants, they should adopt one illegal immigrant to live in their house.

One country allowed millions of low IQ migrants to flood in, while the other didn’t. Be like Poland.