Hey @TXStrong11 and @TrustIsEarnd - I'd like to respond to some of @SteveBakerUSA rant, but unfortunately he blocked me, because he wants to make it harder for people to see alternate opinions, so here goes. (And he'll see this, he see's all my posts even though he blocked me, and often responds.) First, IsThisReal Life, of course the DOJ would not cause themselves pain by arresting the wrong person in Brian Coal. They were literally 32 days away from the Statute of Limitations expiring when Coal was arrested, which would have made this whole thing disappear. No more questions asked. "It was unsolvable, these things happen," they could have said. Think about it logically, if the J5 pipe bomb was part of a "fedsurrection" you hoped to keep hidden, the best way to do that on December 4, 2025 was do nothing, not arrest some mope you know didn't do it. They didn't do that, they arrested the right guy. The changed alibi? Baker is obsessed with the puppies vs. dog scenario. It's nonsense. Notice how he doesn't try and discredit Dan Dickert as a witness, Ms. Kerkhoff's roommate who was there at the time? He's the alibi - nobody has accused Mr. Dickert of being part of the conspiracy or accused him of lying to the FBI. You know who wouldn't be in jail right now if he had an alibi witness as good as Mr. Dickert? Mr. Cole. Failed polygraph? Says who? Cole's lawyer said the polygraph examiner told Ms. Kerkhoff she failed. That's not the same as actually failing. It's a standard tactic (ask me how I know) for examiners to tell examinees they failed. Let's wait and see if we actually see the report, which will never see the inside of a courtroom for a bunch of reasons anyway. There is a high probability Ms. Kerkhoff's name never makes it into any trial. As for the questions the FBI won't answer - why would they? There is an ongoing prosecution. They don't answer questions about evidence in the middle of a prosecution. I'm not in the FBI anymore and have taken a pretty good stab at all these questions for months. It's what got me blocked by Baker and his ace investigator @accabbat. They don't have evidence of Cole's car driving away, they have a video of a car they THINK is Cole's car. They don't see him in it, and they can't prove it's his car. And they can't account for how the various traffic and Capitol cameras are time synced anyway. The shoes? The FBI said when they were looking for the hoddied person it could have been UP TO a size 12. And Baker never says what size FOOT Cole has. Only that his various tests show it's a 12. He claims to have access to Cole's mother. Weird how he hasn't asked her what size foot he has, or if he ever owned a pair of Nike Speed Turfs. Cole said he owned them, and threw them away. Blind spots? That's negative evidence. The prosecution doesn't have to prove what didn't happen. You know what's really interesting? @accabbat has been following this case since before Baker identified Ms. Kerkhoff as his subject. I've got a video of him on a podcast (safely secured so it can't get erased,) months before Baker's November 8, 2025 article where @accabbat describes the bomber as wandering around aimlessly and that he doesn't know the area well. He also said the subject had to sit frequently because of the weight of the backpack, because he was "weak." What changed? Because now this all hinges on a semi-pro athlete who knows the area well having done it. BTW, they have also claimed at various times (with no evidence) the bombs were picked up and replanted shortly before 1pm on the 6th. How? If the pipe bombs "lit the fuse" as Baker claims, why would they plant them 17 hours before the big event and count on the incompetence (that actually occurred) that they would not be discovered. If that wasn't the case who picked them up when and replanted them? The Loudermilk witnesses are noise. I never worked a case of any substance where some witness(es) didn't misidentify the subject. Cole's defense team can call them if they want to waste some time. Let's see if Baker wants to respond to any of this.