Joined September 2016
5,356 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
25 Jan 2023
4
15
37
7,490
Remember, during today's literal cage match on the White House grounds: No matter what, it's not his house. It's our house. Get a hat, coaster, or sticker to support groups and candidates who will respect the form AND the function of the people's house. shop.onwardtogether.org/coll…
2
2
49
It's going to be a 90/70 day tomorrow in Wisconsin. 90 degrees, 70% humidity.
1
32
» J H « retweeted
3
20
122
7,701
» J H « retweeted
If that is true, then it would have been enough to save his House seat. Yet....
Thomas Massie revealing the names of Epstein’s clients would be enough to earn him the presidency.
31
110
839
16,110
» J H « retweeted
Replying to @wootenforga
More hard to believe: your boss held a fundraiser for the political opponent of someone she was publicly investigating. Guess that didn’t bother you.
1
3
106
Steve Cohen wants racially segregated elections.
With the new TN districts broken up 29%, 29%, and 32% Black the only thing not adding up here is the GOP’s claim this new map “isn’t about race”. I’m no mathematician, but if you see a pattern, assume it’s telling you something. Numbers don’t lie— people do.
1
60
An admission that the data Peters was trying to preserve would have overturned the election. Thanks Kaitlan.
Tina Peters, the Republican former election clerk imprisoned for crimes related to efforts to overturn the 2020 election, will receive clemency from Colorado’s Democratic Gov. Jared Polis and soon be released from custody, Polis exclusively told CNN. cnn.com/2026/05/15/politics/…
1
46
Yet another reason to deport them.
Immigrants who are afraid that local law enforcement will turn them over to ICE are less likely to report crimes or serve as witnesses. This is why local policies that distinguish federal civil immigration law from local criminal law enforcement are important and keep us all safe.
27
Joyce, like most Democrats, wants racially segregated elections.
The Supreme Court, which ordered Alabama to create a second Black opportunity district just three years ago, has lifted that order one week before the primary. The Purcell principle says courts shouldn't permit chaos too close to an election—it's now an open question as to whether there will even be a primary on schedule.
54
Would Biden's DOJ have released them if they were Trump recordings? Answer honestly.
NEW: Joe Biden plans to mount a legal challenge to DOJ’s effort to release 70 hours audio tapes of his conversations with ghostwriter Julian Zwonitzer to Congress and/or the Heritage Foundation. w/ @joshgerstein politico.com/news/2026/05/10…
1
2
3
117
» J H « retweeted
Replying to @FuarFearg @nytimes
This is 100% on Roberts. He covered up Snook.
1
6
174
» J H « retweeted
Replying to @FuarFearg @nytimes
They didn't care about Amit Jain, so why would they start now?
1
3
140
» J H « retweeted
Wow. Ciaramella used the old form, the one that did not allow hearsay. That means the entire impeachment was void ab initio, meaning it was legally dead on arrival. The fact that Atkinson then secretly changed the form and backdated it makes it all exponentially worse.
Back in 2019, we knew that Atkinson had changed the form, but we didn't KNOW whether Ciaramella had used the new form or the old form. It turns out that he had used the old form - the form which required first hand knowledge. The copy of Ciaramella form made public excluded the first two instruction pages in which the firsthand requirement was stated. While Atkinson subsequently changed the form, it was the earlier form that was submitted (sans the two instruction pages.) Atkinson's position was that Ciaramella had first hand knowledge of some things. However, the things that he had first hand knowledge of do not appear to have been especially relevant. Atkinson cited Grassley as authority that secondhand information should be permitted for a whistleblower report. But Atkinson glossed over difference between a non-urgent concern and an urgent concern. This doesn't seem to have been focussed on in discussion. The requirement for firsthand knowledge was reasonable enough for an "urgent" concern. Another point that hasn't been discussed much. In the Solomon articles in March-April 2019 which led into these discussions, there was discussion of Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election. Trump's contiguous discussion of the CrowdStrike server supports the possibility that Trump was seeking investigation of 2016 election interference - an entirely proper request - as opposed to anticipatory interference in the 2020 election. One of the major misunderstandings of Ukrainian interference in the 2016 is that the interference was initiated by Biden cadres (especially at the Jan 2016 meeting with Ukrainiain prosecutors and Biden cadres while Biden was a leading candidate for nomination) and resulted in the Black Ledger operation that decapitated Paul Manafort as campaign chair in August 2016. The role of Biden cadres in this interference has been clouded by incorrect pointing at Clinton campaign. There was obviously no way that any of Ciaramella, Wilde or Atkinson could have reasonably been sure that the issues raised by Trump weren't related to past 2016 events, as opposed to still distant 2020 events where Biden's nomination was far from guaranteed. The issue of Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election surfaced from time to time in the 2019 impeachment hearings, but was ridiculed and shouted down by State Department officials. None of the Republicans or their staff appear to have been well enough informed to focus on the valid issues.
236
4,768
10,437
451,466
» J H « retweeted
This is true 👇🏼 Just a softer version of impeachment. Radically Weaponizing and Politicizing legitimate government
Mission accomplished by Boasberg. Wasted a year of the Admin's time, resources, and attention, subverted democracy, and will face no consequences. The court really need an internal discipline system that doesn't respect professional courtesy.
1
1
62
» J H « retweeted
Fairly certain Witness One is Vindman given he was on the call, Witness Two is the NSA detailee who worked on the ICA. Coup.
Is this new? Vindman worked for NSA. Was called up to do a Dual Assignment with NSC AND Fills in for someone on leave for “three weeks” and this is when the call happens. A Superior NFI intelligence Directorate shows him a transcript. Then “Vindman tells CIAramella. And the ball is in motion. Vindman says he is open to an interview at CIA. (Is three weeks normal for a government vacation?) Vindman has concerns that the transcript is in CODE WORD meaning joint action. A. This seems pre planned. B. Weeks before I believe Pence has talks about taking on Corruption so it’s on topic C. Did they need the transcript to be reported to everyone. Thinking Schiff etc. because it would warn them they are looking into corruption and this would be the only way to get it urgently. Or all to impeach?
20
367
977
42,854
» J H « retweeted
🤝🤝
7
67
218
11,306
» J H « retweeted
I remember October 10, 2020 very well, when my friend.@FOOL_NELSON first identified Eric CIAramella and I started threading his State Department and White House (and VPOTUS) visitors log information. Fool was kind enough to reference my work product in his first interview on the subject. I shared a lot of CIAramella material since then, but most of the old foia links are inactive now. Here is a link to every State Department record ever released with CIAramella’s name included. Much of it has to do with loan guarantees to Ukraine. Which Biden used as leverage to get investigators to leave his druggie whoremonger son alone. foia.state.gov/FOIALIBRARY/S…

12
165
451
20,072
» J H « retweeted
Fool for the Win
Replying to @FOOL_NELSON
A good candidate for Witness Two is Gavin Wilde given his background and his involvement in the ICA, plus connection here to Alperovitch/Crowdstrike. x.com/i/status/1952795034853…
2
26
79
7,244
» J H « retweeted
Trump: You don't have to close the Strait of Hormuz... It's an important waterway. Iran: You're nuts... The Strait is in our backyard and we have closed it. Trump: This is not good for the world economy; please reopen the Strait. Iran: We're not reopening anything. It is closed and that's final. Trump: we can't even reopen it... We already have enough oil and are willing to sell to interested buyers. Iran: 😂😂😂 you're now afraid of our mines in the Strait. We told you. IRAN IS WINNING!!! Trump: okay! That's perfectly fine. We can even help you close the Strait completely. Iran: I don't understand. I can't remember asking for your help. Trump: you don't have to. What are brothers for. We're going right into the Strait to close it completely. Iran: you can go in there. We have mines all over the place and we have forgotten where the mines are. Trump: don't bother yourself. We'll find the mines, remove them and close the Strait completely. Iran: you don't have to do that... Can you just calm down let's talk over this 🙏 Trump: don't worry. The Strait would be closed completely tomorrow, no ship enters your port and no ship leaves your port. Iran: 🙆🙆🙆 you're already taking this thing too far... Besides we're even planning to reopen the Strait tomorrow. Trump: don't bother again kid bro... Let's do it your own way. Iran: this is serious but you said you're going to keep negotiating with us. 😭 Trump: we'll come back later but for now the Strait is blocked. Iran: please, can you just allow me send this 4 million barrels to China, they've already paid. Trump: of course you will, just forward the receipt of your $8 million dollars toll fee to Vance. Iran: Truuuuuuuuump!!!!!
512
3,803
20,863
1,847,320
It's April 13th, 2026 and the transcript for IG Atkinson's October 4th, 2019 testimony has been released. You can find it here: intelligence.house.gov/wp-co…

4
52