#switzerland shame on you‼️

Ok...

$tsla Asians love Tesla👏👍

Wow Japan😱

📊 𝐈𝐍𝐕𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑 𝐍𝐎𝐓𝐄: Wedbush Sees 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐥𝐚–𝐒𝐩𝐚𝐜𝐞𝐗 Merger as Likely in 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟕 - $SPCX $TSLA 👉 𝐊𝐞𝐲 𝐇𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬: ➤ Wedbush estimates an 𝟖𝟎% chance of a Tesla–SpaceX merger in 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟕. ➤ Analyst expects merger to occur following a potential 𝐒𝐩𝐚𝐜𝐞𝐗 𝐈𝐏𝐎. ➤ Tesla now holds a 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐒𝐩𝐚𝐜𝐞𝐗 through prior transaction activity. ➤ Recent 𝐓𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐟𝐚𝐛 facility collaboration seen as increasing operational overlap. ➤ Wedbush views integration as part of Musk’s broader 𝐀𝐈 𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐬𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐦 strategy. ➤ Combined entity could connect Tesla’s autonomy ambitions with 𝐒𝐩𝐚𝐜𝐞𝐗 infrastructure. ➤ Merger outlook reflects 𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐲𝐬𝐭 𝐨𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐧, not a company announcement.

If I may bring a bit to the debate, I had this thought. Authorizing more shares than outstanding is indeed pretty common, as noted by @Yochana42437421. But the question is: to do what? 1- Raise capital 2- Buy something (and this something is clearly Tesla... not OpenAI lol) In reality it will be both, the question is what will be the ratio. We can quantify this if we look at what SpaceX wants to do. SpaceX will need indeed to raise capital. Once Starship is reusable, mass production will start. And the near term target will be to deploy massive AI compute in Space. Let's first aim at 10x the current terrestrial US compute and let's do the math for how much it would cost. - SpaceX/xAI plans target ~100 kW of compute power per ton of satellite mass at scale. - 10x current US compute would mean scaling to ~8–9 million GPU-equivalents or equivalent FLOPS/power capacity (roughly 3 GW of AI-focused power draw, depending on efficiency). - At 100 tons per Starship launch: ~300 launches total for the full constellation - Launches per year per Starship: ~180 (365 days / 2). - For 300 total launches in one year: ~2 Starships (theoretically, with perfect cadence and rapid turnaround). More realistically: 10 Starships - Cost of one Starship unit booster today: $90 million. This is at prototype level, if mass production starts, $50 million should be reachable, $500 million to build the fleet. This is peanuts. - AI tonnage: 100 kW of compute power per ton, 3 GW target, total mass needed: ~30,000 tons - If we assume a cost of $2000/kg for AI compute, we need $60 billion to build 10x the current US compute in the form of AI satellites. Therefore, the cost of building and launching 10x the current US compute in Space, including building the Starship fleet, is around $60 billion. Triple that (current US compute is still growing, cost may be higher at first), you are still under $200 billion. So if you look at the math, there is no way that SpaceX would need this amount of capital. The best explanations are: - To buy Tesla - Or just in case for the future... It's not because you can issue these shares that you will issue these shares. This is of course possible. So if you connect the dots: - Elon has a super majority at SpaceX, SpaceX will therefore vote yes to any terms - Tesla shareholders need to be convinced and offering very generous terms is the best way to do this - Even if Elon offers very generous terms to Tesla shareholders, due to his super voting rights, he still maintains control (Jo's point) - SpaceX will not need to raise amount of capitals in the order of magnitude implied by the newly authorized shares It is likely that these newly authorized shares are there to buy Tesla at a super premium. @JOBhakdi @TeslaBoomerMama @CernBasher

Thank you @JOBhakdi Great stuff, lets see what happens next months🤞 youtu.be/e2F1LcfLuE8?is=CFs6…

$fubo #fubogang CEO david scamler interview

Snowflake a Jalen Brunson like monster quarter showing AI monetization on the software layer starting to accelerate meaningfully. First Palantir…then Datadog…now Snowflake. Agentforce from Salesforce also very positive data point. AI Ghost narrative being proved wrong 🔥🐂🎯🍿

Bald hoffentlich🙏😅

$tsla Good luck to all selling tesla in hope to get spacex 😂

other regulators across 🇪🇺 need to wake up and act now to make our roads safer. Enough is enough. pls stop letting politics and OEM lobbying delay life saving technology. Lithuania approving supervised FSD is a step in the right direction. the rest of Europe should follow.

📢 𝐉𝐔𝐒𝐓 𝐈𝐍: $TSLA Tesla China FSD Rollout Signals Strengthen; Hiring Spans 9 Cities Tesla China posts multiple autonomous driving test roles across Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Suzhou and Wuhan, fueling speculation of accelerating FSD (Full Self-Driving) rollout in China. Company customer service says approval process for OTA deployment of advanced driver-assist features is under regulatory review, with updates to be pushed once approved. (Daily Economic News)

$tsla everybody panic selling for $spcx

IF anyone IS selling $TSLA in an attempt to have a piece of SpaceX $SPCX, it's a bad idea. Why? Well, it's going to be so oversubscribed that there will likely be very very very limited retail allowed or allocated shares. Also, even when be able to participate, you can say you'd like 100 shares but most only allocate significantly less (in this case likely 2-3 shares if lucky). Now, while you get your hopes up for a miracle to get in and getting your feelings hurt again, the ONLY people that will make money off SpaceX will be those that got in a while ago in the private markets. Will it go up the day of IPO, likely. However, I predict it will go down faster than the titanic. Then, while you sold your Tesla shares to get in, not only did you NOT get in but you waited for the wash sale to pass and now have to buy higher again. Lose/lose. That's how markets work.

▪️ $TSLA 🌌📈

$fubo Something weird going on, stock market all time high and $fubo all time low. David Scamler is doing something very wrong for shareholders. Managment fire asap @davidgandler @AHorihuela

- the sentiment for $SoFi is as bad as ive ever seen it nothing has changed fundamentally is this a BUY, HOLD, or SELL?