Joined August 2017
2,524 Photos and videos
If you ever put anything out there and I push back on you hard, please don't be offended. Its just me. Push back. Don't get defensive, but push back why you believe what you believe. Even if I disagree, I'll respect that you believed it enough to push back and we can be friends
6
6
40
If you don't believe we effectually sinned with Adam in the Fall, then you cannot truly believe we are effectually put to death and made alive with Christ in baptism. If you can't embrace being appointed a sinner, you cannot embrace being appointed righteous. [Romans 5-6]
84
So it's not a metaphysical condition, it's just a metaphor for a... Metaphysical condition?
1
69
@rootcausesleuth and the other guy who has me blocked.
1
49
Red voters are like the smart kid playing a board game who has a tantrum when another kid makes an irrational choice they didn't expect which allows someone else to win instead. They haven't learned to adapt their thinking to how other humans operate, rational or not.
Then it’s just retarded in general. It’s like would you risk your life to save half the babies in the world. The wording of the question and context is everything. If you’re still voting blue when children are disclosed you’re a fucking idiot. If you’re still voting red with children involved you’ll survive but so will everyone else
1
82
This is the guy continually accusing Calvinists of arguing dishonestly 😂😭 It's not conditional on ANYTHING THAT WE DO. This is the definition of intentionally not understanding. It's not unclear, it's not complicated. Nate is going out of his way to make a dishonest argument.
If all dying infants are elect then that at least implies that election is conditioned on something, not unconditional.
1
266
It's literally in the Bible. 😂😭
Sola Scriptura Geniuses are celebrating Easter this Sunday. Easter's date, however, isn’t in the Bible. The date was set by a Church at the First Council of Nicaea in 325 AD. Easter will be celebrated this Sunday because of Catholic Tradition. You’re welcome, Protestants.
92
Josh Bigbee's Unpopular Opinions retweeted
Sola Scriptura Geniuses are celebrating Easter this Sunday. Easter's date, however, isn’t in the Bible. The date was set by a Church at the First Council of Nicaea in 325 AD. Easter will be celebrated this Sunday because of Catholic Tradition. You’re welcome, Protestants.
589
482
4,345
184,122
Can we please stop this nonsense? Easter was Ester, which was a translation by Tyndale into English, from the month of Pascha, which was a month likely named for a pagan goddess, Eostre. Just like most of the month names you use every single day. Easter just means Passover.
Please stop listening to your church and just read your Bible! 🙏🏼
1
1
149
If you complain about it you should probably stop using our pagan calendar at all. Learn how language works.
2
30
There are two types of people in the world. People who can extrapolate from incomplete information.
Did you know? There is no verse in scripture that uses: • “non‑elect” • “nonelect” • “not elect” • “not chosen” (as a theological category) • “the unelect” • “the non‑predestined” The Bible never labels a group with a term that is the opposite of “elect.” Scripture does use these terms frequently: • ἐκλεκτός — “elect, chosen” • ἐκλογή — “election” • ἐκλέγομαι — “to choose” Examples: • Matthew 24:22, 24, 31 — “the elect” • Romans 8:33 — “God’s elect” • Colossians 3:12 — “elect of God” • 1 Peter 1:1–2 — “elect… according to the foreknowledge of God” But Scripture **never** uses the opposite term. Even when describing unbelievers, rebels, or the perishing, the Bible never says they are “non‑elect.” Election is always: • corporate (“in Christ,” Eph 1:4) • vocational (chosen for something) • covenantal (belonging to God’s people) Never: • a label for who is excluded And even ἀδόκιμος (“disapproved,” “reprobate”) in passages like Romans 1:28 is: • moral • experiential • descriptive of behavior It is **not** the opposite of “elect.” The NT consistently frames election as: • a status found only “in Christ” • a group identity • a purpose‑driven calling Don't you find that interesting?
3
84
Why did it take 5 seconds of clock to call a defensive offsides? What is this? 2011?
86
It definitely was a hold on the would-be Walker TD but that's only after the false start 🙄
1
151
It's embarrassing to the NFL that Jobe is still playing.
2
277
First half of the #Superbowl -Everyone talking about Drake, but Darnold has done nothing too. -Bad Patriots tackling accounts for two of the FGs. -Kupp bobbled and never had control with 2 feet in. -Blatant push in Schooler's back right in front of the returner was ignored.
1
1
1,646
Don't worry guys. Refs saw it this time...🙄
67
That contact was so much less than the Seahawk push on Schooler in the 2nd quarter in the exact same spot 🤦🏼‍♂️
1
55
Josh Bigbee's Unpopular Opinions retweeted
Why I believe the #Patriots are extremely undervalued tonight: 1.) The schematic mismatch The clearest edge in this matchup is the Seahawks offense vs the Patriots defense, specifically when it comes to play action. Seattle’s offense is heavily built around play action, and that’s where Sam Darnold has been at his best all season. • Seahawks with play action: 0.33 EPA per play (1st) • Seahawks without play action: -0.03 EPA per play (14th) That split is massive. Their efficiency drops off significantly when play action is taken away. Now look at what New England does defensively: • Patriots pressure rate vs play action: 45.6% (1st) • Patriots EPA per play allowed vs play action: -0.22 (2nd) New England not only generates pressure against play action at the highest rate in the league, they also completely suppress efficiency when offenses try to lean on it. That directly attacks the strongest part of Seattle’s offensive identity. 2.) Interior pressure problem A major issue for Seattle all year has been interior pass protection, especially whoever is lined up over Anthony Bradford. Bradford grades as the 2nd worst pass-blocking guard in football (35.9). He’s been better down the stretch, but facing New England’s interior defensive line is a different level of stress. 3.) Game-winning situations • 3rd down success (offensively) • Patriots: 40.7% • Seahawks: 40.6% • 4th down success (offensively) • Patriots: 72.4% • Seahawks: 58.3% • Defensive red zone success • Patriots: 60.4% • Seahawks: 50.9% New England converts better when it matters most and gets stops at a much higher clip in the red area. 4.) The QB matchup Drake Maye hasn’t had his cleanest playoff performances, but we’ve seen him rise to the moment before, and this feels like a spot where he’s due for one of those games. Sam Darnold has played efficient, mistake-free football so far, but this matchup introduces real pressure on the exact area where his offense thrives most. Prediction: Patriots 24, Seahawks 21
IT’S SUPER BOWL SUNDAY. Kalshi gives the Seahawks a 68% chance to win it all over the underdog Patriots. Who’s lifting the Lombardi?
8
6
57
14,151
This guy's entire thread just screams that he thinks it's all about himself. I mean, I don't think HE thinks that But he does. Why would someone like this even have a vote? I've seen him on Twitter for years with awful takes and had no clue he was a voter 😆
Replying to @SamMonsonNFL
I'm not missing it, but when they overhauled the panel of voters I believe they did so to give new viewpoints a voice, not just to repeat people following stats to whatever conclusion. x.com/i/status/2019651810504…
54
Chargers - Broncos 23-20 week 3 Seahawks - Texans 27-19 week 7 Broncos - Texans 18-15 week 9 Texans - Chargers 20-16 week 17 Broncos - Chargers 19-3 week 18 Patriots - Chargers 16-3 Patriots - Texans 28-16 Patriots - Broncos 10-7 in one half of play. Consistent scoring ranges.
70
I just won my fantasy league with NONE of the first 4 wide receivers I drafted contributing AT ALL. London(AWOL), Nabers(IR), Hunter(IR), and McLaurin It was Diggs(8th) and Olave(10th) who got me through, two picks that drew laughs. Yes, JT, Achane, Breece, & McBride helped.
92