This is one major problem with routinely distorting the language of international law to advance a preferred sociopolitical agenda and/or push pure propaganda.
Conduct that ISN'T a war crime (like the Minab school strike) is widely denounced as one anyway, while conduct that actually IS a war crime passes goes overlooked & is largely ignored.
This development illustrates that point perfectly well.
As I & many others have persistently pointed out, attacking "civilian" infrastructure such as power stations that ALSO serve a military function is NOT automatically a war crime. If there is truly NO military utility, then it IS. Same if the expected incidental harm is excessive in relation to the concrete & direct military advantage anticipated.
But to conclusively make that determination, we need access to information regarding knowledge & intent of personnel responsible for EACH attack.
Unfortunately, that doesn't stop pundits and activists and academics and...well, Democrats in Congress (particularly noticeable since Op Epic Fury got underway) from denouncing basically ANYTHING as a "war crime" on the basis of a non-doctrinal, effects-based analysis often built on pure speculation or double hearsay from anonymous sources reported in the "news" media.
Then there are ACTUAL war crimes being committed right in front of our faces and...nothing. No one notices or even thinks to point it out.
Like Iran State TV announcing a plan to "create human circles around the country's power plants." Although Iran hasn't ratified AP I (pic 1) or the Rome Statute
@IntlCrimCourt (pic 2), it's uncontroversial to conclude the prohibition against using civilians to shield military objectives from attack (AP I) or from military operations (both) reflected in the text of each treaty is binding as a matter of custom. In fact, this IS an ACTUAL war crime established in the Rome Statute.
So while 🇺🇸 & 🇮🇱 are widely falsely accused of committing potential "war crimes" for directing attacks against "civilian" infrastructure that...isn't, 🇮🇷 announcing a plan to commit ACTUAL war crimes won't make headline news or warrant even a peep from most (or all)
@TheDemocrats in Congress.
This is the ultimate effect of manipulating & distorting & flat out misrepresenting
#LOAC for political and/or propaganda purposes. The term "war crime" now amounts to nothing more than "a trap to the innocent and a signpost for the guilty," as British Foreign Minister Austen warned in 1927 would happen back then by adopting a definition for the crime of aggression.
It's a sad state of affairs, but it mostly comes down to just 2 contributing factors: ignorance & ideology.
And unfortunately, we only have ourselves* to blame.
* most especially Democrats
#TheMoreYouKnow #legaldisinformation #journalisticmalpractice