Bitcoin Man

Joined March 2021
304 Photos and videos
Thought experiment: Let’s say a worker gets paid $100k and generates $150k in value for his company. Then, a tool comes along that enables the worker to generate $200k in value for his company. Does the company fire him? No, they reinvest that excess return by hiring more workers
45
AI and BTC both increase the returns on labor. This will increase demand for labor, not decrease it. For every worker who retires off their BTC gains, an entrepreneur will hire 10 new workers with their BTC gains. For every job that AI “eliminates”, it will create 10 new jobs.
2
64
An analogy for the quantum “computing” scam: - Step 1: Fart into a microphone. - Step 2: Claim the fart noise was generated by a quantum flatulence simulator, and would’ve taken 10,000 years for a classical computer to replicate. - Step 3: Profit
1
83
So the government is now looking to buy a company that it forced into bankruptcy by blocking another company from buying it. Fiat clown world intensifies
NEW: Bloomberg reports that the potential bailout of Spirit could result in the federal government owning up to 90% of the airline. Wow.
109
Homo Bitcoinicus retweeted
I am okay with never adding quantum-resistance to Bitcoin and more people should be considering that position.
54
23
273
25,212
Imagine getting mugged on the street and then the guy mugging you says “Hey you know what, I’m going to let you keep some of your money for now, I just gave you a real wage increase” 🤣
Bessent: I want to encourage everyone out there watching today to change their withholding ... you will get an automatic real wage increase on a weekly or a monthly basis.
43
The Sharpe Ratio is a fiat metric. This chart shows BTC having the lowest Sharpe Ratio among the assets listed. However, if you denominated everything in BTC, the Sharpe Ratio would be undefined, as it should be. A Bitcoin maximalist shouldn’t care about Sharpe Ratios.
Most assets struggle to reach a Sharpe of 1. $STRC is at 3.88.
2
92
The most valuable company in 1995 was GE with a market cap of $100 billion. Today, Nvidia has a $4.5 trillion market cap. These are just US based companies, the TAM for Bitcoin is way higher, the supply is finite, and it has no competition.
Feb 7
Saylor: "In 2045, one BTC will be worth $13 million." That means in 19 years, Bitcoin needs to hit $273T MCAP. For perspective, that’s equal to: All global equities → ~$110T Every vehicle on Earth → ~$10T All the gold ever mined → ~$13T All the silver in the world → ~$1.5T Entire U.S. banking system assets → ~$24T All global residential commercial real estate → ~$105T Every piece of art, watches, and collectibles → ~$15T Now I see why people call us delusional 💀
167
Homo Bitcoinicus retweeted
"Central banks might not always be around" - Christine Lagarde Timestamp 20:15 in this video youtu.be/uKNK0TT5fW0?si=PwaQ… Study Bitcoin
2
3
243
Homo Bitcoinicus retweeted
11 Jan 2009
Running bitcoin
11,670
44,706
133,922
Homo Bitcoinicus retweeted
The people that created the red lines are blaming the people that created the blue lines…
The AI backlash is here. This post has a million views. People hate technology. They hate innovation. They see that it is coming for their jobs. Coming for their way of life. Innovation is asking them to do more work. To spend nights and weekends learning about AI and building new things. They hate that. And I've seen it my entire career as people tell me over and over again that they don't like what I'm pitching them. How many have gone to an Apple store and had a demo of the Vision Pro? Even in Silicon Valley I keep finding smart people who refuse. And my consumer research outside the valley shows far far greater resistance. There are couple other such posts this morning going viral: @zachweinberg: x.com/zachweinberg/status/20… @tszzl: x.com/tszzl/status/200248841… Here's the real problem. Let's say you burn down Silicon Valley. The Chinese are coming and coming with cars that will eviscerate the rest of the auto industry. Americans can't see that because we tax the heck out of them and keep them from selling here. And soon they are coming with robots. Americans can't see that because they aren't like me meeting with robot pioneers here and in China. Or watching the robot community here on X (or understand what they are talking about with their highly technical talks about world models and reinforcement learning. And they are coming with AI models. Most Americans are sticking their heads in the sand and ignoring what's going on on @huggingface and here on X. I talk to entrepreneurs around the world who keep telling me they are building businesses on Chinese models because they are cheaper and better. And they are coming with entertainment businesses that will eviscerate Hollywood. Most Americans see AI artists as anti human. The Chinese don't. The only way out of this is innovation. That's where any new jobs are gonna be. So go ahead and burn down Silicon Valley and San Francisco. That won't save your job and will doom America to being a poor country subservient to the Chinese. And, yes, we need to do a better job of explaining the role of innovation. But that job is bigger than what I can do. Why? Because people hate innovation and want to stick their heads in the sand, and even, roll back innovation, my posts aren't getting any reach here on X outside of a small group of innovation supporters. Well, I'll keep supporting the innovators. I made lists of almost all of them, 37,000 in AI alone, and 7,600 AI companies: x.com/scobleizer/lists But that isn't nearly enough. The entire industry needs to do a better job of talking to everyday people and getting them to see a better world is possible. For now all they hear is "you are taking my job." And they aren't wrong about that either. Which makes this all so difficult to get people onto the side of innovation.
147
594
4,386
964,725
Quantum computers do not exist. What people call quantum computers today aren’t really quantum and they can’t compute anything.
42
Nic Carter fantasizing about “Q-Day”
39
Homo Bitcoinicus retweeted
14 Dec 2025
$BRR IS NOT JUST ANOTHER SPAC GONE BAD, IT’S A BAG JOB AT SCALE. @APompliano hyping “DEMOCRATIZE” $BTC access while it all turns into total amateur hour—stock obliterated over 60% post-SPAC merger in days with retail slaughtered by obscene dilution. Be extremely suspicious of anyone throwing around the word "democratize"—it's pure grift speak to suck in bagholders and unload trash. Pomp really screwed up massively with this disaster. This is the worst first week performance of any de-SPAC in history. Sadly there will be no jail time for this “legal fraud.” His radio silence on is shameful. No ABUNDANCE for $BRR shareholders—just nuked accounts, vaporized savings, and brutal losses. In a word, SCARCITY. Please repost this RELENTLESSLY. Influencers wrecking everyday people need to be exposed.
11
10
22
8,132
Homo Bitcoinicus retweeted
The consensus rules have always been about morality One charge that's frequently levied at knotzis is that any attempt to reject spam at the consensus level is based on "moral" objections to spam transactions instead of "technical" objections. One problem with this... 1/4
24
22
95
17,174
Homo Bitcoinicus retweeted
you can disagree on what morals to prioritize (that's kinda the essence of morality) but arguing that bitcoin has no moral component and it's all pure technology is ridiculous. some very disappointing replies to what is in no way a controversial thread.
The consensus rules have always been about morality One charge that's frequently levied at knotzis is that any attempt to reject spam at the consensus level is based on "moral" objections to spam transactions instead of "technical" objections. One problem with this... 1/4
14
5
69
13,478
Don’t worry guys, they didn’t technically “sell” BTC. They diluted shareholders to buy BTC, then sold it at a loss in exchange for shares of another company that now holds the BTC. According to CEO David Bailey, this transaction “Will generate non-dilutive bitcoin returns”. 🥴
Replying to @BTCtreasuries
CORRECTION: Nakamoto's has clarified that the balance decrease reported in its most recent Q3 financial filing were the result of funds invested in other treasury firms.
186
Murch: “We have no idea how we want to use Bitcoin in 50 years”. This statement really epitomizes “The Core side” of the debate. No Murch, we know exactly how we want to use Bitcoin. Here are the use cases: 1. Send 2. Recieve 3. HODL
8 Nov 2025
Part 4: Knots vs #Bitcoin Core Discussion w/ @murchandamus & co-host @jimmysong! * Part 5 w/ @knutsvanholm and/or @giacomozucco next week from @btchistoricosv event by @bitcoinofficesv!
3
171
Homo Bitcoinicus retweeted
Replying to @verysmallclaims
Lotta this going around
1
1
9
243
“Uhh, crypto, blockchains, smart contracts, tokenization, stuff is real” - Jamie Dimon We’re supposed to believe this guy runs the largest bank in the world, and he sounds like a complete buffoon every time he opens his mouth 😂
JUST IN: JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon admits he was wrong and crypto is “Real.”
142