Founding Partner of Jordan Honickman Barristers, practicing in Ontario and Alberta. President of @arlcanada. Tweeting on various nerdy stuff.

Joined March 2010
10 Photos and videos
The most profound differences between the United States and Canada are constitutional. But because our leaders have increasingly Americanized our constitutional culture, many Canadians anchor their identity to socioeconomic policy - regardless of whether it works.
I’m not going to measure my healthcare proposals on how ā€œAmericanā€ people perceive solutions to be. I will instead ask the question: Why is our universal healthcare system underperforming nearly every other universal system in the developed world, at a higher cost? What lessons do top performing systems like those of Japan, Denmark, and the Netherlands hold for us? Nor will I buckle at acknowledging reality: The vast majority of healthcare in Ontario is delivered privately but paid publicly. And frankly, it would be decent for the media to actually state this as a duty to inform the public. Ensuring there is ā€œcompetitivenessā€ among providers Ontario is paying is paramount to the public interest. There is no need for this word to be taboo in our healthcare conversation. Many of the solutions are operational and technological, not ideological. Digital health records. Integrated specialist referral systems. Public 24hr urgent care centers. Public fast diagnostic centers. So many more! Ontarians want to see the public system work. That will be my priority and focus. Not only will I invest in expanding access and capacity, nobody will ever need to pay for it out of pocket.
3
2
23
1,832
It's odd that many of the same people who refer to an inanimate legal document as a "living tree" also describe a country full of living and breathing people as an inanimate "mosaic". The "living tree" actually works for Canadian society as a whole (and is closer to the analogy's original meaning). A grafted prunus features a beautiful variety of different fruits that retain their distinct appearance, flavours and textures; but the fruits are only able to flourish because they are sustained by the same thick trunk, healthy roots and fertile soil.
Carney: Canada is a mosaic, not a melting pot. And this is the distinction that matters. Because a mosaic doesn't dissolve or blend its pieces. Each is stitched to each and all the pieces hold all. And the beauty is in the arrangement, not in the blending.
7
7
49
7,723
The Chief Justice "invited the conversation. He does not also get to set its terms." Or, as Justice Binnie said in the context of defamation: "People who voluntarily take part in debates on matters of public interest must expect a reaction from the public.Ā  Indeed, public response will often be one of the goals of self‑expression.Ā  In the context of such debates (and at the risk of mixing metaphors), public figures are expected to have a thick skin and not to be too quick to cry foul when the discussion becomes heated."
Richard Wagner has spent his time as Chief Justice turning himself into the self-appointed guardian of Canadian democracy: annual press conferences, speeches about the rule of law, warnings about democratic backsliding. The old convention was that judges speak through their rulings and otherwise keep quiet. Wagner seems to find that beneath him. He wants to be a public figure, not just a judge. The irony is that every time he steps up to the microphone to defend the court’s legitimacy, he’s the one politicizing it. A judiciary that lets its work speak for itself doesn’t need a spokesman. Wagner has made himself one anyway, and the institution is worse off for it.
1
13
53
6,998
Asher Honickman retweeted
Is Canada safe for Jews? That’s the wrong question New and exclusive polling for The Hub finds that more than 80 percent of Canadians believe that Canada remains a safe country for Jews. The finding is striking because it suggests that the rise of the new antisemitism has yet to fully register with much of the public. Canadians may see disturbing incidents in the news, but many still assume that Jewish communities are able to live, worship, gather, and participate in civic life without extraordinary concern for their safety. Yet the lived reality is often quite different. Across the country, synagogues, schools, community centres, and other Jewish organizations are spending significant sums on private security, surveillance systems, barriers, guards, and other protective measures. These are costs that many institutions scarcely contemplated a decade ago. Today they have become a routine feature of operating budgets. ļæ¼ This should concern all Canadians. The most basic responsibility of the state is to provide public order and security. Before governments regulate markets, redistribute income, or pursue any number of social objectives, they must first ensure that citizens can safely exercise their fundamental freedoms. When religious communities feel compelled to internalize the cost of their own security, it’s a sign that the state is falling short of this core obligation. The consequences extend beyond the immediate burden imposed on Jewish institutions. Many synagogues, schools, charities, and community organizations enjoy charitable status because governments recognize that their activities contribute to Canada’s civic life. They educate children, care for seniors, support families, provide social services, foster community, and strengthen the social fabric. The public subsidy implicit in charitable status reflects a judgment that these activities generate benefits that extend well beyond their own members. But every dollar that must be redirected toward security is a dollar that cannot be spent on those missions. A synagogue that hires additional guards may have fewer resources for educational programming. A community centre that upgrades security infrastructure may have less money available for outreach, charitable work, or support services. A Jewish school facing rising security costs may have fewer resources to devote to teaching and student support. These are real opportunity costs. They represent a loss not only for Jewish communities but for Canadian society as a whole. One way to think about the issue is that government failure in one domain is undermining government policy in another. The state grants charitable status to these organizations because it wants them investing in civic life. Yet its inability to provide basic security forces them to divert resources away from precisely those activities. The result is a poorer and weaker civil society. This is why concerns about antisemitism shouldn’t be viewed as issues affecting only Jews. A country in which one religious minority must increasingly provide for its own safety is a country experiencing a broader failure of public order. And when institutions that strengthen our communities are forced to redirect resources from their missions to their protection, the costs are ultimately borne by all of us. The question isn’t simply whether Canada remains safe for Jews. It is whether Canadians recognize the growing costs of making Jewish communities responsible for their own security.
.@Sean_Speer: The Carney government gets it wrong on AI thehub.ca/2026/06/05/the-car…
13
32
110
14,268
Asher Honickman retweeted
ā€œIslamists arrive and are given permission to give vent to their ancient loathing by anarcho-socialists, and their naive campus enablers, who love Palestine but hate Canada, and despise Jews most of all.ā€ nationalpost.com/opinion/ivi…
49
150
495
29,911
Asher Honickman retweeted
This is far longer than my typical post, but it tells an important story of what appears to be an attempt by leadership at Massey College to censor a major conference on antisemitism, leading to the resignation of one of its senior fellows. The disappointment that greeted Mark Carney’s antisemitism speech this week is partly a function of a Jewish community that has been facing real threats for months, with fears that our governments and institutions have been unwilling to confront them directly and honestly. Hours before the Carney speech, I received a note from Peter Biro, a Toronto lawyer and longtime senior fellow at the University of Toronto’s Massey College, that provided a tangible example of the harm. Biro, facing what appears to have been an attempt by Massey College leadership to censor a major antisemitism conference planned for this fall, resigned his fellowship rather than succumb to it. Biro proposed, organized, and committed to personally fund a one-day conference, ā€œAntisemitism in Our ā€˜Free and Democratic Society’: A Canary’s Song,ā€ co-presented with the Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights and featuring Deborah Lipstadt, Deborah Lyons, and Irwin Cotler, among others. According to his resignation letter, which I am sharing here with his permission, the College told him it had never approved the event and insisted on appointing an advisory committee to review, curate, and approve a version of the program that fit the College’s ā€œmission and approach.ā€ When he asked who had raised concerns and whether such a committee had any precedent, he says he received no answer. Biro calls the stated objection false and a pretext. The real concern, he argues, is the substance: how antisemitism would be examined, by whom, and whether a human rights centre founded by a Jewish and Zionist lawyer was an acceptable partner. That objection makes little sense, since the College itself partnered with the very same centre only months ago. In Biro’s words, the committee ā€œlooks and feels less like prudent corporate governance and more like antisemitism.ā€ Read the letter and judge for yourself. Here is the part that should worry everyone. An academic institution responded to a conference on antisemitism, organized by one of its own fellows and featuring some of the world’s most notable antisemitism scholars, by insisting that an oversight committee was needed to decide whether the subject was being handled appropriately. I’ve organized many conferences and never had university leadership intervene in this manner. Massey College, much like Mark Carney, had a chance to lead, but both failed to meet the moment. The conference will go on in Toronto on September 15. The stain on Massey College will not come off as easily.
43
219
629
84,472
Asher Honickman retweeted
In @the_lineca today, an essay adapted from part of a lecture I gave at @cardusca earlier this month. The full lecture will be published soon, but this part mostly stands on its own: The Case for a "Loose Confederation" readtheline.ca/p/howard-angl…
3
11
30
4,304
Asher Honickman retweeted
6.39pm That was the time stamp on our photo taken by photographer Peter Meagher, that has just been recovered. The attack at Bondi started 6.42pm on Dec 14th and this was one of the last photos he took. I still remember like it was yesterday. He took one shot and said ā€œperfect, everyone is smiling.ā€ Those with small kids know how tough it is to have one child look at the camera and smile, let alone all the kids at once! Yet Peter was just able to bring out the best in everyone. Our paths crossed just for a fleeting moment, but you could tell what a beautiful, kind man he was. Minutes later, Peter’s life was taken, along with 14 other innocent souls that day. We are also so deeply grateful to Amir Glazer, Peter’s friend and colleague, who was with him on the day and since been working day and night to help recover Peter’s photos and provide some comfort to countless families, like ours, for whom he captured these moments of pure joy and happiness. I hope the recovered images will now also provide some measure of closure to Peter’s wife Virginia. As for us, we will forever cherish this photo as a memory of what was and the beautiful smiles on our children’s faces, as a reminder how life can change in a flicker and to treasure every moment with our loved ones. May Peter’s memory and all those who died that day, forever be a blessing!
30
111
878
19,505
Asher Honickman retweeted
Today is the 85th birthday of Bob Dylan, one of the most influential musicians of all time. Born Robert Zimmerman to a proud Jewish family, Dylan changed music forever while never losing touch with his Jewish roots. In honor of his birthday, here’s a beautiful Bob Dylan story: Bob Dylan once quietly walked into a Chabad house in Brooklyn and asked to wrap tefillin. The rabbi helping him didn’t recognize who he was until later, saying: ā€œHe had the same soul as any Jew coming back home.ā€ Even legends find their way back.
61
189
1,303
36,461
Asher Honickman retweeted
Democracy also requires that all Canadians have a say when a fraction of the electorate in one part of the country tries to break Confederation. And democracy requires that in the event of an actual attempted separation, the parts of the province that don’t want to leave Canada, such as, oh, say, the cities of Calgary and Edmonton, remain part of Canada. If Canada is divisible, then Alberta is divisible. But none of this is about democracy. Democracy is not a free floating concept. It operates within existing institutions and social constructs. Separatists aren’t engaged in a democratic project, they are proposing a revolutionary act of constituent power. Democracy is the wrong lens through which to view attempts to break up a country in the absence of genuinely inhumane conditions or systemic oppression. And as much as I agree enthusiastically with many separatists’ grievances with Ottawa (and other provincial governments), this is not that.
Democracy is not an enemy. Our democracy requires our elected officials tell us what they actually believe and what they plan to do in office before putting those beliefs into action. Our democracy demands separatists generate real democratic legitimacy to hold a secession referendum. Democracy demands a separatist party declare itself as such before it is elected to power. Democracy demands that an explicitly separatist party defend itself in debate during a writ period; to be honest with the voters about the benefits and risks of holding a secession referendum. Democracy demands that a separatist party win power in the legislature in a free and fair election prior to holding a referendum. Albertans deserve this. Anything short of it isn't "democracy." It's an abuse of democracy by process. It's a betrayal of the trust of the voters of the highest order.
147
68
288
119,766
Asher Honickman retweeted
šŸ”ˆ Our comments condemning the reprehensible actions of Itamar Ben-Gvir: ā€œThe @AIJAC_Update unequivocally condemns the appalling, unacceptable and inflammatory conduct of Israeli Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir in taunting activists from the Gaza flotilla. Such behaviour is irresponsible and inexcusable, serving no constructive purpose and only undermines Israel’s legitimate legal and security rights in stopping this flotilla. Detainees simply should not be treated this way, and the international community has the right to expect far better from an Israeli minister. Importantly, Ben-Gvir’s disgraceful actions were swiftly and publicly condemned by Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar, multiple high-ranking Israeli officials and many others across Israel, underscoring that his outrageous conduct does not reflect the position of the Israeli Government or the broader values and norms of Israeli society. At the same time, we must underscore Israel was fully justified, both legally and operationally, in intercepting vessels attempting to breach the naval blockade. The legality of Israel’s actions, and its right to stop such boats in international waters when they have a declared intent to breach Israel’s legal blockade, has been repeatedly affirmed under international law, including in the UN’s 2011 Palmer Report. Everyone involved in this flotilla knew full well they would almost certainly be intercepted, briefly detained and deported, as has occurred with numerous previous flotillas. The fact is, this latest flotilla was not a genuine humanitarian mission, but a dangerous and provocative political and media stunt. No previous flotillas have carried any meaningful aid for Gaza, and organisers have consistently rejected opportunities to transfer aid through Israel or established international mechanisms. Reports also indicate this flotilla was linked to the Hamas-affiliated Turkish group IHH, which Israel designates as a terrorist organisation and which played a central role in the violent 2010 Mavi Marmara incident. Meanwhile, hundreds of truckloads of humanitarian aid continue to enter Gaza through established channels every day.ā€ Dr Colin Rubenstein, Executive Director, AIJAC
46
18
58
16,881
Asher Honickman retweeted
I highly recommend this excellent post by @DwightNewmanLaw on the key purposes of the Canadian Charter's section 33 notwithstanding clause: constitutionaltheorymonitor.…

5
12
797
Asher Honickman retweeted
The majority's judgment runs 249 paras. Kasirer J tends to write long, but this is not a shining moment for accessible judicial opinions. The more they mirror academic articles or submissions to a legislative committee, the more divorced from legal adjudication they become.
The Supreme Court of Canada in a 6:3 split allowed the appeal in part in Ahluwalia v. Ahluwalia, 2026 SCC 16. The Court recognizes a new tort of intimate partner violence, grounded in coercive control and harms to dignity, autonomy and equality. #SCC decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc…
9
9
56
8,988
Asher Honickman retweeted
It was my pleasure to help write this paper on ā€œUnseating Responsible Governmentā€ with @SunKerry @yuanyi_z for @MLInstitute and, yes, for the constitutional edification of Mr. @acoyne
The latest paper from the Macdonald-Laurier Institute navigates the growing tension between judicial power and parliamentary democracy in Canada. Read ā€œUnseating Responsible Government: Judicial Interference in Canada’s Parliamentary Democracyā€ by @GeoffSigalet, @SunKerry, and @yuanyi_z hereā¬‡ļø macdonaldlaurier.ca/unseatin…
1
7
19
1,024
Asher Honickman retweeted
ā€œUnder the Charter, judicial power in Canada has grown in unsettling ways. Through the expansive interpretation of various provisions of the Charter, the courts have exerted significantly more control over the law- and policy-making process than the framers envisioned. These legal developments are at odds with the constitutional tradition of parliamentary government that Canada received from the United Kingdom and have to date remained largely unchallenged,ā€ write @GeoffSigalet, @SunKerry, and @yuanyi_z in the latest MLI paper. In ā€œUnseating Responsible Government,ā€ Geoffrey Sigalet, Kerry Sun, and Yuan Yi Zhu argue that decades of expansive judicial interpretation under the Charter have steadily shifted power away from Parliament and toward the judiciary. Read full paper hereā¬‡ļø macdonaldlaurier.ca/unseatin…
3
31
93
41,377
Asher Honickman retweeted
One final point worth making: The timing for Kristof's oped was to get ahead of this new report on Hamas. In other words, he wasn't trying to reveal sexual crimes, but to cover for them. And it worked. It always does. edition.cnn.com/2026/05/12/m… The UN secretary general is soon going to decide which countries should be on a UN blacklist for sexual violence. Kristof is campaigning to get Israel on the list, while getting Hamas's crimes off the public agenda.
A lot of subscribers have asked what I made of the Nick Kristof oped. So much has already been said. What more is there to say? My first thought was everyone else's. Horrifying. Testimonies of pain and torture. We know that the Israeli Prisons Service is notoriously incompetent. There have been cases of Hamas prisoners abusing each other, and even famous cases of them abusing female Israeli guards. We know, too, that all prison systems struggle with the problem: New York prisons face 2,000 claims against them. So abuse of prisoners isn't merely possible, it's guaranteed. October 7 and the ensuing war sent thousands of detainees into the prisons. And in the early months, drafted into the system undertrained reservist guards. Guards who had seen Hamas's videos gleefully documenting their crimes. I expected, therefore, a hard-hitting story of real abuse, something Israeli leaders must take notice of. And then I came across the first obvious lie. And then the second. And then an odd claim -- maybe possible, but how exactly? -- and then another just like it. And a famed Hamas propagandist laundered as a reliable source. And then another. Why, if there is no doubt that abuse occurred -- and there is no doubt -- was there so much obvious propaganda in Kristof's oped? I won't pretend the lies weren't a relief. They were. It's agony to read about Israeli criminality, and the lies let me cast doubt on the whole narrative. There's an obvious propaganda campaign at work here. But as claim followed claim, it became hard not to wonder: Despite the propaganda, what part is nevertheless true? How bad has it gotten? So here's what we know, or at least what I think I know. This is a campaign that seeks our destruction. Kristof quotes people who celebrated October 7 and want Israel destroyed, and will lie to achieve that goal. We know how the lies in this story made their way into it, where they came from and what purpose they serve. Even so, I'm not willing to conclude there's no truth at all in there, just because there are lies. Dogs did not rape anyone. The people who invented that particular inanity claimed it without evidence, knowing that no one, certainly not self-appointed moral arbiters like Nick Kristof, would ever bother checking the provenance of the claim. Because they never, ever do. Because why would they? So the claim spreads through the millions-strong activist network without investigation, exciting and mobilizing -- not because anyone understands how it might be possible but for the sheer thrill of it. And it's cited by Kristof as a reliable report. A recent report by a Norwegian NGO, also referenced, claimed "systemic sexual violence" in the West Bank by citing just 16 cases across three years in a geographic region containing as many as three million Palestinians and over half a million Israelis. And some of the examples scarcely cleared the bar for harassment. But the NGO in question knew for a fact that no journalist would look too deeply into any of it. And indeed, no journalist did. Because they never, ever do. Because why would they? Friends, a paper trail is being created. Just like they created a paper trail on mass starvation in Gaza -- mass starvation first claimed in early 2024, and then claimed again and again by NGOs, the UN, everybody. Some were nuanced warnings of a "possibility," some declared it had arrived. The headlines from both were largely the same. And then, in thundering silence, the mass starvation claim just faded away, never having materialized -- while billions of ordinary people around the world who don't follow too closely remain convinced that countless Gazans died of starvation. So they moved on. A Lancet letter claiming hundreds of thousands of deaths spread like wildfire, mostly because (a) nobody actually read or understood what it claimed and (b) nobody cared enough to check if it was remotely plausible. Then, just in case anyone forgot Lancet, came the claim by UN rapporteurs of the deaths of hundreds of thousands of children -- 380,000 infants under five allegedly died, more than the entire population of infants in Gaza. Stupid, right? But it was repeated again and again by activists and protestors. No one checks, no costs are exacted for the never-ending barrage of fakery. Because why would they? A wild religious frenzy has taken hold. Hatred of Israel is now definitional to the left, and to parts of the right. Greta Thunberg has forgotten all about climate change. An enemy of humanity has been identified just in time to unleash all the pent-up religious rage that this troubled secular age won't allow against anyone else. And by complete and utter coincidence, that enemy you're suddenly allowed to hate is vaguely associated with the Jews. Yes, alas, it really is that simple. But also, dear friends -- bear with me -- it isn't. All the above is true. They're fucking liars and bigots. They marched in their millions, again and again and again, for weeks and months and years -- marches completely unprecedented in their size, regularity and duration in all the history of the West, in all the history of war, larger by orders of magnitude than all other marches for all other conflicts and wars and suffering combined, even those caused by their own governments. And no serious person pretends that anything similar could ever have coalesced or will ever coalesce again unless Israel is involved. "But we fund you," shouts the American activist to explain this mind-numbing selectivity. Then why did one-third of the city of Amsterdam march? Or millions of Spaniards, Brazilians and Indonesians? It was unprecedented and it was everywhere. And Kristof has joined the new religion. Not by being concerned about abuse, but by not caring one whit whether he's trafficking in truths or lies. Only the Jews will ask to distinguish between the two. He just needs to throw it all on the page, and his membership in the glorious crusade is assured. Alas, the Jews are correct about the nature of this moment. Some things are so big and fundamental, so assumed and widespread, that they become hard to see. Fish don't notice the water. Activists who can only ever march against Jews are convinced they are merely righteous people enraged by war, without ever pausing to wonder why the only war that ever enraged them or ever made its way to their phones was one particular war, and not larger and deadlier wars also conducted with Western weapons and money. And so the Jew is made fearful once more. Throughout Christendom and Islam, he is being returned to his proper place in the social hierarchies of old, complete with anxious conversos and ideological purity tests. And yet, still, despite it all, their lies aren't the end of the story. Their lies are a separate story. A campaign of lies that constitutes a return to the mean for the Jewish condition in the West. A campaign meant to justify brutality against us, not to end war or suffering. And despite all of it, dear Jews, there really is abuse. It's nowhere near as much as the psychotic claims of these fantasists. Not by orders of magnitude. If it was, they wouldn't need to lie so much. But it's there nonetheless. Many dozens of cases at least, probably in the low hundreds by now, most of them without any sexual aspect, but still wanton violence. Exact numbers are hard to come by, but the army gave a few estimates to the courts a couple of times over the past three years. There have been many indictments filed against soldiers, serious ones. I know something about a handful of those cases. I know that the problem is real. It's there, it's real, and it doesn't seem to be stopping. And if it isn't stopped with an iron will and uncompromising hand, it will continue to fester and grow. And it must be said: neither Ben Gvir nor Netanyahu are interested in fixing it. Nobody at the top cares about the rights of prisoners. Let me be clear: For the first time in my life, I support a death penalty. No one who crossed over the border to massacre and kidnap on October 7 should be left alive; they came to kidnap children precisely because they sought the release of mass murderers kept alive in our prisons. Hamas, as always, in its totalizing brutality, forces the choice: If their murderers live, our children may die. I choose our children. And those who came for our children cannot be deterred, reformed or deradicalized. They murder their own to clear a path to murdering ours. And so I believe they must die. We must try, convict and destroy them. And even I, radicalized in this narrow, specific way, say we cannot collapse into torture or abuse. That's not justice. It isn't even vengeance. It is participation in Hamas's way of war. Nor do our leaders seem to care about the simple breakdown of discipline that these abuses represent, the kind of breakdown we saw again and again with the incidents of looting in Gaza and in the early cases of prisoner abuse that came to light. No, dogs aren't being trained to systematically rape prisoners, you nattering halfwits. And no, Hamas propaganda operatives are not reliable sources on the question of Israeli crimes. The vast, vast majority of soldiers are honorable men who walked into fire so our families may live. The whole world may turn on them; I will stand with them, grateful for their sacrifice. And Kristof, a willing purveyor of propaganda happily feigning that he can't see the water and thrilling to a moral crusade engineered by would-be genocidaires he pretends not to understand -- is no messenger of moral reckoning. But friends, so fucking what. Let the narcissistic guttersnipes strut their moral emotions before the world, let the UN publish endless reports that don't hold up to basic scrutiny, let the NGOs dream their rabid, sick dreams that no journalist ever fact-checks -- yes, they're lying. But so fucking what. We still, for ourselves -- because fuck them -- must see that it isn't all fake. The problem is real. It's far smaller than they claim, but real nonetheless. And when discipline and morality break down, it can only get worse. We either crack down now or we watch it fester and grow. And our own Ben Gvirs are stubbornly refusing to fix what is actually broken, the real thing in the real world. And so we are caught in a strange sort of vise, the same vise we find ourselves in with the genocide lie: A vast propaganda machine that seeks to destroy us -- countless activists too high on their own self-regard to see the irony of raging against a "genocide" while calling for the erasure of a people -- all while our own incompetent, venal, self-absorbed political class insist in their mindless chatter on confirming every claim of our enemies for sheer, bald egomania. I'm sick of it all. I know you're all sick of it too. And that, in a nutshell, is what I think about this. Just because they're lying, just because a vast perfidious campaign has overwhelmed global elites in a bid to clear the way for our removal, just because they're still, after two millennia, building their visions of redemption on The Evil Jew -- doesn't mean there isn't also, separately, a problem on the ground. So what do we do now? Simple. We see it, we acknowledge it's happening, we bring our rage to our inept leaders until they bend to our will and act to stop the breakdown... And we soldier on. We soldier on because the enemy really is coming to murder us. Because Hamas must still go if Gaza is ever to rise to a new day. Because Hezbollah will yet destroy Lebanon on the altar of destroying us. Because the ayatollahs built their whole damn religion on the extermination of our children. We fix the broken things within us as if the pogromists and their simpering Kristofs don't exist. We owe no answers to the propagandists who seek to clear a path to our deaths. But we do owe answers to ourselves. Let the screaming mob rage and churn like so much sea-foam. Despite that raging mob, despite the enemy who still seeks our destruction, and yes, despite feckless incompetents like Ben Gvir, our minister of prisons, who claim to lead us -- we remain the strongest, freest Jews who ever lived, more capable and committed than our self-destructive enemies ever imagined. And the task is still before us, yet to be completed, the sacred duty given to our generation to ensure our children don't have to face the genocidaires who now surround us. We do not waver, we do not stumble. We soldier on. Because fuck them all.
59
564
2,386
94,830
Asher Honickman retweeted
.@MarkJCarney Prime Minister, why did you appoint a Governor-General who admitted herself that as U.N. human rights chief she gave a free pass to the worst tyrannies, saying she was ā€œconstrained by the reality of the organization's power centers, including China and Russiaā€?
I am very pleased to announce that, on my recommendation, His Majesty has approved the appointment of the Honourable Louise Arbour as the 31st Governor General of Canada. Across more than five decades, she gave voice to those whose dignity was denied, held institutions to account, and changed lives through her service. As Canada’s next Governor General, Louise Arbour will represent the best of Canada to our citizens and to the world — a Canada clear-eyed about the challenges we face, and steadfast in the values we uphold.
66
623
1,293
112,543