🚨BREAKING: Two illegal migrants have been charged after another gang rape attack in Glasgow A woman was dragged from the cycle lane near the river Clyde on Sunday at 1am 2 men aged 19 and 20 are due in court, 2 others were released without charge Locals are all saying they are illegal migrants Media have turned off comments sections everywhere the story is being reported We cannot go on living like this

It appears that @PoliceScotland is trying to cover up the gang rape by 4 or 5 migrants of a 17 year old girl in Arbroath. The town is on the east coast of Scotland.

Nick Timothy doubles down

This is another reason why Labour want to ban social media for U-16s. They don’t always follow the left-wing trend.

Young Bob @YoungBobRB is attacked and has his equipment stolen by criminal migrants. Our streets are not safe. Britain never used to be like this. Disgraceful.

The baby was with a gay couple for a matter of weeks. He’d been taken to hospital several times. His injuries included bruising and serious sexual assault. Medical professionals, the police and social workers didn’t act. Too afraid of being called homophobic?

The Navy That Could All Along. It Just Needed A By-Election. On Sunday morning, Royal Marine Commandos and National Crime Agency officers boarded the Smyrtos, a Cameroon-flagged Russian oil tanker, in the English Channel. The operation took six hours, supported by Chinook, Merlin and Wildcat helicopters, an RAF P-8 Poseidon, and the warships HMS Sutherland and HMS Ledbury. Keir Starmer ordered it personally and called it "yet another blow to Russia." It was the first UK-led boarding of a Russian shadow fleet vessel in British waters. The authority for this operation has existed since March. That month, Starmer agreed that British armed forces and law enforcement could stop, board and detain sanctioned shadow fleet vessels in accordance with international law. That is the legal framework. It has sat in place for eleven weeks. In those eleven weeks, more than two hundred sanctioned tankers sailed through Britain's exclusive economic zone. Checked. Unchallenged. Three days ago, Britain's role in shadow fleet enforcement was still limited to supporting others, while France carried out its fourth such boarding, commandos rappelling onto a tanker four hundred nautical miles off Brittany. Two weeks ago, a former Royal Marine MP told the Defence Secretary that France had again demonstrated seizing these vessels was "both legal and achievable," and that the gap between Britain's permissions and Britain's actions came down to the Attorney General's hesitation. Finland, Sweden, Estonia, France and the United States, he said, have no such hesitation. In April, the explanation on offer was that the constraint was never legal capability. Lord Hermer's framework required an individual legal case for each boarding, and the government used that requirement to explain months of watching sanctioned vessels pass through British waters. A Russian frigate escorted tankers through twenty-one miles of Channel while Iran closed a strait of similar width with a single announcement. The Navy was ready. The law, we were told, was not. The law was ready in March. What changed on Sunday was not the framework. It was the decision to use it. Makerfield votes on Thursday. Reform holds every council ward in the constituency. A government that spent eleven weeks explaining why two hundred tankers could not be touched found, four days before a by-election it cannot afford to lose badly, that the first one could be. This is not really a story about Russia, or about the Channel. It is the same story as Britain's asylum backlog. 87,450 people. A four percent removal rate. Years of unused levers. It is the same story as Hungary, which received 47 asylum applications in the same six months Britain received roughly 50,000, and as America, where border crossings fell from 1.6 million to under 240,000 within months of a government choosing to act. The tools existed throughout, in every case. The decision to use them was the only variable that was ever missing. On Sunday, for four days' worth of reasons, it stopped being missing. "Agency officers boarded the Smyrtos, a Cameroon-flagged Russian oil tanker, in the English Channel. The operation took six hours, supported by Chinook, Merlin and Wildcat helicopters"

I’ve just been checked over by an ambulance after a group of foreign lads came up behind me while I was doing a debate stand, dragged me to the ground, and kicked and punched me. I passed out halfway through and don’t remember everything that happened. From what I can recall, it started while I was sitting down, and they took some of my equipment during the assault. The police arrived about five minutes after the assault, recovering as much as they could. One of my cameras exploded when they tried to seize it, or steal it. Instead of running away with it, they destroyed it, causing the battery to explode. However, I have the SD card, and we'll be checking whether the footage is still there so they can identify what actually happened. Members from Stand Up to Racism were counter-protesting, and they were egging them on and filming it. The police did nothing to stop the counter-protesters or retrieve the footage to see what actually happened. I’ll be going to the hospital now, as I have a cut and a number of marks on my neck, bruises on my face and the top of my head, and cuts running down my back.

.@PeterStefanovi2 Lord Heseltine has been one of Britain's most committed europhiles for forty years, and he's spent the decade since the referendum trying to overturn its result. A man with that record doesn't get to declare the result a con and be treated as a neutral observer. He's a participant in this argument, not a judge of it. But take the claim on its own terms. If Brexit has not delivered what people voted for, the question that follows is why. And the answer is not that people were sold a false prospectus. The answer is that the people charged with implementing the result, the civil service, the Treasury, much of the political and legal establishment Heseltine has belonged to his entire career, never accepted that result and built a settlement designed to dilute it. The Trade and Cooperation Agreement kept Britain tethered to EU regulatory standards through level playing field provisions. Britain became a rule taker rather than a rule maker. Northern Ireland ended up with an internal regulatory border that nobody voted for. That is not what Leave campaigners promised. It is what the people Heseltine represents delivered instead. So if this is a con, identify the con artists correctly. It is not the fifty-two per cent who voted to leave. It is the establishment that spent the years since engineering a halfway house, then pointing at the halfway house as proof the whole project was fraudulent. Rachel Reeves told the Economist she wishes Britain had voted Remain. She is completing exactly the project Heseltine has spent a decade demanding. The con is still running and Heseltine is one of its longest serving operators. As for heinous crime, that is the language of a man who has never accepted that seventeen million people might have had legitimate reasons for their vote and is still, a decade later, unable to process the fact that he lost. "The con is still running and Heseltine is one of its longest serving operators."

10 June: Canada tables an under-16 social media ban age checks for everyone. Five days later, Starmer announces the same for Britain. Same policy. Same timing. Same “safety” language. Coincidence - or another piece of the global censorship agenda?

RT @JENpatriotic: A video has come to light that the police tried to hide. Body cam footage shows the moment two British police officers as…

Who is signing off woke university grants?

The Jobs Did Not Disappear. They Were Rented To People Who Cannot Legally Work. 729,000 people aged 16 to 24 were unemployed in Britain between January and March this year. The youth unemployment rate, 16.2 percent, is the highest since early 2015. For the first time since records began in 2000, it is now higher than the EU average. Almost one million young people are not in education, employment or training, the highest figure in more than a decade. The explanation offered is economic headwinds. The cause is closer to home. Employer National Insurance contributions rose in April last year. The minimum wage rose with it. The sectors that have always absorbed young workers first, retail, hospitality, delivery, became the most expensive sectors to hire into. Job vacancies have fallen seven percent in a year, to their lowest level since April 2021. The pattern is simple. Raise the cost of hiring at the bottom of the market, and the bottom of the market stops hiring first. But the jobs have not disappeared. Walk down any high street and the delivery riders are still there, in greater numbers than ever. What has changed is who is doing the work, and how. At the Midland Hotel in Derby, a Grade II listed building housing around two hundred asylum seekers, a whistleblower described the daytime scene. The hotel is not busy, they said, because everyone is out at work. Delil, an Ethiopian asylum seeker staying there, put it plainly. "I work for Deliveroo like a lot of my friends. I want to work, that's why I came to the UK." This was documented in December 2023. Researchers at Nottingham Trent and Heriot-Watt found migrant couriers earning between £900 and £1,500 a month. The mechanism is a rental market. An account holder with the right to work registers with Deliveroo, Uber Eats or Just Eat, then rents access to that verified identity to someone who does not have it, for £70 to £100 a week. At the time, hundreds of such accounts were available on Facebook Marketplace. In the first quarter of 2025, almost 750 civil penalty notices were issued to companies for immigration breaches, the highest since 2016. The response came later. Deliveroo told MPs it had removed 105 riders since April 2024 for exactly this. In July 2025, the Home Office began sharing asylum hotel locations with the delivery firms, so they could flag accounts spending unusual time nearby. Asylum seekers are barred from working for their first twelve months. The data-sharing exists because, as Delil already said on the record, many already are. Robert Jenrick called the substitutes system a driver of illegal immigration that put public safety at risk, because the companies were not carrying out proper checks. He was right, eighteen months before anyone with the power to fix it agreed, and the underlying arrangement, an entry-level job performed by someone the law says cannot hold it, accessed through an identity rented from someone who can, has not gone away. It has simply become harder to spot. Put the two facts together. A record number of young Britons cannot get a foot on the first rung of the labour market, priced out by costs the government itself imposed. At the same time, the first-rung jobs are being done anyway, documented, named, on the record, by people the system says should not be working at all. Nobody designed this as a system. Nobody has dismantled it either. Years after the Midland Hotel investigation, the high street looks exactly the same. "Researchers at Nottingham Trent and Heriot-Watt found migrant couriers earning between £900 and £1,500 a month."

Keir Starmer has gone full tilt He knows how unpopular he is. He wants his ‘legacy’ Forcing the entire nation of adults to digitally ID verify to participate , Spyware & facial scans 1984 writ large

UK’s Newest British Ambassador Lily Allen Apologises to Channel Migrants in Calais For What Our Nation Has Put Them Through … 🤡

Here is the POLICE throwing Siobhan Whyte the mother of RHIANNON WHYTE to the ground in Brighton. WHAT HAS THIS COUNTRY BECOME.

My brief take on @GBNEWS re Labour's 2-tier social media ban for u 16s. Somehow Starmer forgot to ban Bluesky. They're such numpties: so keen to contol how plebs communicate, they forget to control their own comms & make their biases blatantly obvious. wa.me/447976628584?source=ex…

This is a nanny state DICTATORSHIP dressed up as protecting your children. Tomorrow Starmer announces TWO things. A full social media BAN for under 16s and a CURFEW for 16 and 17 year olds at night. Different policies. Same destination. Australia tried the ban in December 2025. Three months later 70% of under 16s were STILL accessing banned platforms. Their own regulator confirmed it. VPN usage surged 6,430% when the UK introduced age verification. Starmer knows it will not work. So he is ALREADY consulting on banning VPNs. Documented. March 2026 consultation. That is what is hiding underneath tomorrow's announcement. But you cannot ban VPNs without knowing who is online. You cannot know without verified identity. Verified identity requires DIGITAL ID. And once that exists for under 16s it exists for everyone. All the time. Every child protection expert knows what happens next. Teenagers do not stop. They go somewhere darker. No rules. No oversight. No protection. The NSPCC said it themselves. This is the SAME government that just gave 16 and 17 year olds the right to vote. Starmer's own words. "If you can work, pay tax, serve in the Armed Forces then you ought to be able to vote." Trusted to choose the government. CURFEWED on the internet at night. The father of Molly Russell. The teenager whose death they are exploiting to justify all of this. Has called it a political stunt. Said Starmer is gambling with young lives to save his own. This was never about @elonmusk. Never about your children. It is about the one platform they cannot control. The one place their narrative machine cannot reach before you see the truth. Whoever replaces Starmer. Burnham. Anyone on that Labour bench. This infrastructure does not get dismantled. It gets EXTENDED. Tomorrow is not the end. It is just the beginning.

“Something I’ve noticed A LOT is foreign researchers being awarded UK taxpayer funding to study complete nonsense. Take the fact that one of the researchers behind the infamous study The Europe that Gay Porn Built, 1945-2000, is a Portuguese man who lives in Sweden.” open.substack.com/pub/gillc/…

Starmer’s clearly panicking about by election and that’s why he attacked the Russian Tanker and wants to ban kids from internet tomorrow. He’s gaslighting us and thinks that we’re thick and won’t see what the cretin is doing! He’s getting dangerous now he must be removed!