Baptist. Husband/dad. 2nd gen homeschooler. Conservative. Carpet cleaner. Blogger (@MuskogeePolitco).

Joined April 2009
2,805 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
A friend pointed me to an interview from 2016 in which Tulsa legend John Erling sat down with our old family doctor, the inimitable Tom Coburn, to record for posterity his story, insight, and wisdom. Let me tell you, it's an amazing recording. voicesofoklahoma.com/intervi…
4
2
5
1,013
Jamison Faught retweeted
To the Commission, As a Gold Star spouse, I am grateful that our nation is finally building a memorial to honor those who served and sacrificed during the Global War on Terrorism. This generation answered the call after September 11th and carried the burden of nearly two decades of war. Their service deserves to be remembered. That said, I have serious concerns about the proposed design. When I look at the concept images, I see an abstract landscape. I see architecture, symbolism, and reflection spaces. What I do not see are the men and women who fought these wars or the names of those who never came home. My husband, SSG Alan Shaw, was killed in Iraq in 2007. He was 31 years old. He had a name. He had a family. He had children who grew up without their father. Like thousands of others, his sacrifice was not abstract. Nothing about the current design makes me want to take my grandchildren there to learn about their grandfather and the sacrifices made by him and thousands of others. A national memorial should do more than inspire reflection. It should teach. It should tell a story. It should ensure that future generations understand who served, who sacrificed, and what was lost. The men and women we lost were not concepts. They were individuals with dreams, families, and futures that ended in service to this country. I believe names matter because names force us to confront the true cost of war. They transform statistics into people. The Vietnam Veterans Memorial remains one of the most powerful memorials in our nation because visitors are immediately confronted with the scale of the sacrifice through the names of the fallen. The names are not a design element. They are the memorial. I am not opposed to symbolism or artistic expression, but I believe the Global War on Terrorism Memorial should provide direct recognition of those who made the ultimate sacrifice. If someone visits this memorial fifty years from now, they should not have to guess who it was built to honor. The memorial itself should tell that story clearly and unapologetically. The combat fallen deserve more than an abstract representation of their sacrifice. They deserve to be remembered by name. Respectfully, Sharrell Shaw Gold Star Spouse
Concerned citizens can respectfully contact the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts staff about the initial GWOT Memorial design concept on the National Mall. Email cfastaff@cfa.gov with brief, design-focused comments on elements like compatibility with the historic Mall setting, landscape features, and how clearly the memorial conveys lasting national significance per the Commemorative Works Act. Sample message you can adapt: “As a [veteran / Gold Star family member / constituent], I support honoring GWOT service members and families with a national memorial. However, the abstract symbolic design with vegetation-covered arches and reflection elements raises concerns that it may not provide sufficient direct recognition of individual sacrifice or fully align with criteria for surroundings relevant to the subject. I respectfully ask the Commission to consider revisions during concept review that strengthen commemoration while complementing nearby memorials. Thank you for your important work.” Personalize with your own perspective and send soon—concept reviews are upcoming. Your thoughtful input helps shape a fitting memorial. #GWOTMemorial
39
239
983
52,533
This is a brand new level of sign vandalism... 🤦‍♂️
All smoke and mirrors bro. The Never Trumpers are desperate to hold onto power in our state. Look how low they’ve stooped.
85
Picked the best pump at the station. 👍
3
178
The @OKDemocrats are approximately 11-96 in statewide elections since 2000. 20 year losing streak. They've dropped SIXTY-SIX (66) STRAIGHT losses. LOL. #winning @MuskogeePolitco
We trusting the 1-11 coach to make political decisions now?
8
2
17
6,328
🤔
1
2
92
BRUTAL 😂😂 #okgov #okpol
2
184
Jamison Faught retweeted
The @OKDemocrats are approximately 11-96 in statewide elections since 2000. 20 year losing streak. They've dropped SIXTY-SIX (66) STRAIGHT losses. LOL. #winning @MuskogeePolitco
2
4
407
Jamison Faught retweeted
Just took a short #okgov poll call: 3 questions on Mazzei and 1 on Merrick (they voted for/against this bill, which did this, does that make you more/less likely to vote for them), and then which the 9 GOP candidates would you vote for. 🤔
2
1
1
503
Jamison Faught retweeted
Lol, they mean for one month of new registrations
YOU READ THAT RIGHT.
1
4
113
Jamison Faught retweeted
Spent the weekend in @colonialwmsburg and the place was a practical ghost town. Few tourists, some groups, but there was nobody there. The bookstore was practically empty and gone were the stacks that were carefully curated some 5-10 years ago before the pandemic. There was nothing of merit to take from the gift stores other than tchotchkes. Mugs you can find at suttler stores online for $15 were being sold for $40. CW used to sell seeds much like Monticello, but that's now long gone. Even the things made at CW were in very short supply, and that which was available was mindbogglingly overpriced. Sorry -- no one is paying $4 for a hand-wrought nail. One would think there would be all sorts of tools and gardening supplies. Nope -- nothing to bring home and make a small corner of your world a 24/7 and 365 day a year advertisement of CW. Then there's the problem that makes things a bit worse. For the last 25 years, we have moved the narrative from every person being able to share a bit of the American story towards something more hostile -- namely, that America is a deeply flawed experiment and there is little to nothing to celebrate much less appreciate. If you are a young person interested in history, what are you learning about America? Why pay $25 for a ticket, $25 for a lunch, $100 for a dinner and $100 on hats, t-shirts, magnets, etc. to participate in a thing that everyone -- in order to be socially adaptable today -- believes is at core flawed and therefore evil? It's not just that living history is dying at Colonial Williamsburg. It's not just the message that we should be ashamed of our history. It's not just the fact that it seems as if half of Colonial Williamsburg is closed or too expensive to access. It's not just the fact that tchotchkes rather than seeds, tools, pamphlets, books, and all the things an 18th century Virginian might have brought home from Williamsburg are practically gone. And it's not just that something is missing, but rather the heart of the thing is being swapped out. Now there are a lot of people who are still working at CW who clearly love the place. There are plenty of opportunities -- especially in a world where smartphones are conquering everything -- to get people to set the technology down and re-engage in crafts and trades and understanding that our post-manufacturing age began with tradecraft as soulcraft, and that those trades weren't always neat and clean to 21st century sensibilities (or 20th century ones). Yet one gets the sense that Colonial Williamsburg is reverting to an architectural museum in order to avoid the question "should we love America?" The answer to that question should be more than a kneejerk and patriotic yes, but a thoughtful and overwhelming "of course!" if for no other reason than the Virginians uniquely broke out of a colonial framework and aspired to human freedom. Imperfectly, yes -- but thank God they did, because much of the world wouldn't be what it is today without the courage of a handful. I will always love Colonial Williamsburg and Monticello and Montpelier and Wakefield and Stratford and Chatham and Ferry Farm and Mount Vernon and all of the places that remind us how special Virginia truly is. Yet between the marketing bros, the fear of being right, and the choice to adopt the material over meaning because it is safer to do so? We lose the thing itself in the process. Colonial Williamsburg has weathered changes in the past, but always with an anchor. One worries that the tether to that anchor is being hacked away by myopic people who might not give a damn or understand the stakes. Tradecraft as soulcraft, please. To anyone at CW who might actually care, re-invest in the romance. America is easy to love, I promise.
The Nation has published a special edition for America 250 which, unsurprisingly, carries pieces like: "250 years of genocide, theft, and displacement" "The celebration of the nation's birth is a sham" "Shame" "The Bald Eagle perfectly embodies America's flaws" "America is due for a deep clean." "America is due a third Reconstruction." "Alexander Hamilton, the wrong founder."
24
39
209
52,337
The constant zoom-out to keep Secretariat and second-place in the same shot toward the end... 🤯
Today in 1973, the greatest horse race in history was run. Secretariat won the Belmont Stakes by 31 lengths to become the Triple Crown winner and set a world record time that has never been beaten! 🎥: CBS Broadcast
64
Jamison Faught retweeted
Featuring the excellent Muskogee Community Band, fireworks finale to Stars and Stripes Forever, concessions, and an art auction, this family-friendly event at Honor Heights Park is well worth attending. They have a special patriotic program planned for #America250. Don't miss it!
1
4
92
My favorite community event of the year in Muskogee. Bring the kids out for this family-friendly concert!
Tonight: Muskogee's Symphony in the Park muskogeepolitico.com/2026/06…
53
Too bad it wasn't at night!! 😂
This is crazy! A truck carrying fireworks exploded on a Tennessee highway after a fire started in the trailer. If you have to be stuck in traffic, this is the way to do it.
65
Jamison Faught retweeted
Christians do not believe Jesus is the product of celestial procreation. Christians do not believe God was once a man who ascended to Godhood on another world. Christians do not believe God dwells near a star called Kolob. Christians do not believe faithful humans can become gods ruling worlds of their own. Christians do not believe that Jesus visited America after His resurrection. Christians do not believe Jesus and Satan are spirit brothers. Christians do not believe there are multiple gods. Christians do not believe God the Father has a physical body of flesh and bone. Christians do not believe Native Americans received dark skin as the result of a curse. Mormons are generally kind people. But kindness is not theology. Many Mormon beliefs—past and present—are fundamentally incompatible with historic Christian doctrine.
It’s a new day Still a Latter-day Saint And we’re still Christians—waiting for the Pentagon to make things right
180
505
4,541
227,293
The Bible commands Christians to expose the unfruitful works of darkness (Ephesians 5:11), so let's do some exposing. What Michael Spangler is promoting is not Christianity, it is an attempt to baptize racial partiality with long-discredited proof-texting. Spangler begins with Acts 17:26, arguing that because God established the boundaries of nations, Christians should embrace racial particularism and organize churches around modern racial constructs. Of course, natural providence is not morally binding, particularly in a fallen world. And of course, Acts 17 teaches the opposite of what he claims. Paul's point is that God made all nations from one man and ordered history so that mankind would seek Him (Acts 17:26-27). The emphasis is the unity of the human race under God's sovereignty, not the separation of believers according to bloodlines. Likewise, Spangler appeals to Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth as though Genesis establishes permanent, morally-binding racial destinies and obligations. Yet the New Testament never treats Genesis 9-10 that way. Instead, the gospel moves relentlessly toward the gathering of the nations into one people of God (Matthew 28:19; Acts 2; Revelation 7:9). The descendants of Noah are not the organizing principle of the church, Christ is. Spangler then invokes the Fifth Commandment, claiming that honoring father and mother creates obligations to one's race. But again, Scripture never makes that connection. The Fifth Commandment concerns honoring actual parents and lawful authority (Exodus 20:12; Ephesians 6:1-3). It does not create a category of racial loyalty or racial preservation. That idea has been imported into the text, not drawn from it. He also appeals to "natural affection," arguing that Christians owe special duties to their own people because of blood ties. Certainly Scripture recognizes special obligations to family (1 Timothy 5:8). But the New Testament repeatedly teaches that spiritual kinship in Christ transcends ethnic and biological distinctions (this would apply particularly to a gathered church). Jesus Himself declared that those who do the will of God are His true family (Mark 3:31-35). Most revealing is Spangler's claim that "our white people have unique privileges according to God." Scripture doesn't teach this. Rather, Paul spent much of his ministry dismantling claims of ethnic privilege. Even the Jews, who actually possessed covenant privileges under the Old Covenant (Romans 9:4-5), were told that those distinctions no longer determined standing in the people of God (Galatians 3:28; Ephesians 2:11-22). The very privilege Spangler claims for whites is a privilege Paul denied to Jews. Finally, Spangler argues for maintaining a church "for our own people." But one of the great themes of the New Testament is that Christ has broken down the dividing wall between peoples (Ephesians 2:14-16). The church is a body composed of believers from every tribe, tongue, people, and nation (Revelation 5:9), united not by modern concepts of race but by union with Christ. The fundamental problem with Spangler's argument is that it elevates modern racial framework into a category Scripture never does. Race becomes a matter of covenant obligation, Christian duty, church organization, and divine privilege. The apostles never taught this. Instead, they taught that in Christ, believers become "one new man" (Ephesians 2:15), fellow citizens in God's household (Ephesians 2:19), and members of one body through one Spirit (1 Corinthians 12:13). Spangler is replacing the centrality of Christ with the centrality of ancestry. Scripture has a name for showing favoritism based on external distinctions: Partiality. And Christians are explicitly forbidden from it (James 2:1-9).
53
If you've asked, here you go ⬇️
My Picks for the 2026 Oklahoma GOP Primary (link next tweet) #okpol #OKGOP #okgov @JamisonFaught
1
1
130
My pastor will mark 40 years as pastor at our church tomorrow. His only pastorate, 40 years of continuous faithful service. A rare breed! 1 Timothy 5:17 — Let the elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honour, especially they who labour in the word and doctrine.
1
2
60
1 Thessalonians 5:12-13 — And we beseech you, brethren, to know them which labour among you, and are over you in the Lord, and admonish you; And to esteem them very highly in love for their work's sake. And be at peace among yourselves.
44