A simple rubric for stablecoins vs tokenized deposits.
Tokenized deposits are money that rests. Stablecoins are money that moves.
Tokenized deposits cannot exist outside the bank, but can attract yield (easier), have no off-ramping issues, and handle unlimited volume. Typically, large corporations also receive preferential lending rates for parking large amounts of deposits with a bank.
Stablecoins can exist on ANY platform with a compatible wallet, in ANY country, instantly. They’re more open-loop and not stuck inside the walls of one organization.
These are not the same value proposition.
They're not in competition with each other.
Regulators and banks think tokenized deposits are better. Stablecoin proponents think stablecoins are better. The reality is they're a trade off between risk and speed.
And, counter to the bank lobby or crypto lobby narrative. Stablecoins are good for some banks. Standard chartered, SoFi, Coastal Community Bank and countless others are using stablecoins for cross-border payments, sponsoring card programs and even just lowering their own costs.
So here's a fairer assessment of the differences: