Here's my latest Substack, 'Anyone who thinks these are 'hydration breaks' needs to find the definition of gullible. World Cup matches are no longer two 45 minute halves but four quarters, with ad breaks in between.'
simplysaid.substack.com/publâŠ
Thereâs been an awful lot of anger directed at the BBC for using a studio in Salford for its World Cup coverage (although the commentators are in the US at the matches), not least from Kevin Hollinrake, the Conservative Party chairman.
âThe
@BBC has its World Cup presenters in a Salford studio whilst ITV will be live from New York. Licence fee payers deserve betterâ, he posted on X. âThe BBC has trebled the number of people earning more than ÂŁ100k in the last 5 years. Any good business would make cuts to senior management, not the viewer experience.â
Iâm one of the first to jump on the BBC when it messes up but I really donât think this is a big deal - or even a small one. And Hollinrakeâs logic is odd, criticising the BBCâs excessive spending at the same time as criticising them for not spending more.
I understand the apparent contradiction between the way it is covering the World Cup and, say, its coverage of Glastonbury. Last year the BBC sent 550 people to cover a music festival of interest only to a minority of viewers. The World Cup, on the other hand, is a global event that all but a minority of viewers are interested in. That argument, though, is the wrong way round: the point surely is that the BBC sends far too many people to cover Glastonbury, not that it needs to exercise similar largesse in ensuring that a few talking heads are actually on site in the US rather doing exactly the same thing in Salford.
But while I think this is misplaced anger, there is one aspect of World Cup TV coverage which is enraging (although the BBC is in no way to blame for this): the ad breaks.
The rules of football were first codified by the Football Association on October 26, 1863. There have been many tweaks since then but two fundamentals have never changed. Each team consists of eleven players and each half lasts 45 minutes. I never thought I would see a major tournament â or even a minor tournament, come to that â which did not observe those rules. I obviously underestimated the role of greed when it comes to FIFA decision making.
For this World Cup, games are no longer two 45-minute halves but four quarters of 22, 23, 22 and 23 minutes. After each quarter the teams break for adverts, then resume. Ostensibly these are âhydration breaksâ so the players can have a drink, but anyone who thinks thatâs the main purpose rather than as âad breaksâ would be well advised to look up the meaning of the word gullible. There have always been breaks for water when conditions demand it; these are breaks in every one of the 104 matches, irrespective of the weather conditions.
This matters because it fundamentally changes the nature of matches. Weâve all seen games when our team has been on top at half time â after 45 minutes, that is - and weâve cursed the refâs whistle when it comes â or correspondingly when weâve been holding on against a team on the rampage and have been desperate for the ref to blow the whistle so we can regroup.
That whistle now comes after 22 minutes and itâs already changed games. On Saturday Brazil were 1-0 down to Morocco, who were well on top and threatening to score again. Within six minutes of the second quarter starting Brazil equalised. As manager Carlo Ancelotti said afterwards, the ad break gave him the opportunity to change his system and give players new instructions: â[You can] make a tactical adjustment that can be very good.â
Similarly, Canada equalised soon after an ad break - this time after the third quarter - on Friday. And Scotland scored their winner against Haiti just after the first ad break.
FIFA has long been a by-word for greed. Its president, Giovanni Infantino, makes long speeches about the spirit of football but itâs all sophistry. FIFA is about money. Look at how the World Cup has been expanded to 48 teams. Itâs now almost more difficult not to qualify than to qualify. The idea that this is about growing the game is as spurious as the idea that the ad breaks are hydration breaks. But is anyone surprised?