🚨Our Universal Planetary Temperature Model (shown below) derived from NASA data and first principles of physics and calculus accurately predicts the global surface temperatures of rocky planets & moons throughout the entire Solar System.
The "greenhouse" theory has not been unable to produce a single equation based on the so-called "GHG forcing" that rivals the scope of validity and accuracy of our universal model.
Note that our Equation uses no "GHG radiative forcing" and does not consider outgoing LW radiation. This implies that these parameters are NOT needed to predict planetary temperatures. That's because the GHG radiative forcing is a fictitious quantity generated by faulty computer models, while the atmospheric LW radiation is a byproduct of atmospheric and surface temperatures and, as such, it has NO effect on the global surface temperature of a planet. The current climate theory confuses effect for cause BIG time in this regard.
Yet, "climate experts" such as Roy Spencer and William Happer continue to tout the ridiculous claim that the Atmospheric Thermal Effect (aka "greenhouse effect") is a radiative phenomenon, while in reality it's a form of adiabatic heating caused by total pressure and quantified by the 2nd term in our Equation.
These "climate experts" continue to deny the fact that our Equation works for all rocky planets and moons, while their theory has failed to produce a single universal relationship valid across the Solar System... Ask these experts, why do they keep ignoring the empirical reality described by our Model?