As much as I condemn the unnecessary and baseless criticism directed at
@asmashirazi, one thing stands out. When a journalist is targeted, the fraternity closes ranks almost instinctively. Yet, on issues involving others, where facts are clear and moral clarity should exist, the same voices splinter into conflicting, even opposing positions.
This selective unity exposes how journalists, consciously or otherwise, end up shaping and amplifying flawed narratives. Something is fundamentally wrong in this ecosystem.