Kiwi. Catholic. Thought Criminal. There is no magic dirt. European Indigenous Rights Activist. Don't mistake αηδία for φόβος.
Joined May 2023
- Tweets 29,121
- Following 837
- Followers 1,333
- Likes 28,923
637 Photos and videos
and just like that, a huge market is created for non-UK phones. Apple should pull out of the UK market altogether, cutoff i loud access and Apple TV. Google should do the same.
🚨Labour confirms ID requirement at device level - VPNs useless.🚨
By forcing Apple and Google to verify age at the device level during phone setup…
Keir Starmer’s government isn’t protecting kids — it’s building a surveillance infrastructure.
The OS itself will restrict platforms like TikTok, Instagram and X, making VPNs largely useless because the block happens before any traffic leaves your phone.
🚨Once every device carries a verified age profile, authorities gain an easy route to identify users through legal requests to tech firms.
This is digital ID by the back door, sold as child safety.
Classic Labour: expand state control first, ask questions later.
thetimes.com/uk/politics/art…
38
RT @JAParker29: According to 🇦🇺’s former Deputy Ambassador to 🇨🇳 in the 1970s, 🇦🇺 ships transiting from Southeast Asia to Northeast Asia th…
14
Melissa is spot on. The worst neighbourhood in Singapore makes London's best look like a garbage dump in Bangladesh. There is no contest in any area. In Singapore, the government works for Singaporeans. The streets are clean, public transport is safe and efficient, you can wander around anywhere in the city any time of the day or night and never think of being assaulted or robbed. If something breaks they fix it. There's no graffiti, almost no litter, no drugged out zombies pissing in the street. You can't even make the old freedom argument. In London, you can go to jail for praying silently on a street corner.
Two global powerhouses?
Oh please, I see only ONE.
Singapore is what competent governance actually looks like. It's pro-growth and has strong rule of law. They CANE vandals, graffiti scumbags, and anyone who thinks they can trash a world-class city. Imagine that? The streets are clean and safe for families. Merit and results are favored over feelings and cheap sloganeering.
You? You took one of the greatest cities in human history and ran it straight into decay and decline. Knife crime has exploded on your watch, phone snatchings have soared, and the rate of robberies and violent crime with injury are way up. Young Londoners are so terrified to walk certain streets that many have moved to safer towns in the countryside. The streets are filthier, the tube is far more unreliable and chaotic, and businesses and talent are fleeing London.
Your woke policies are the EXACT OPPOSITE of Singapore's and the results are clear.
And don't get me started on how you've poisoned race relations. London is now a seething cauldron of division and resentment. While Singapore builds unity through shared standards, forced integration, and zero-tolerance enforcement, you've peddled woke grievance politics that pit communities against each other. You've obsessed over "structural racism" and "anti-Blackness," pushing narratives that scream institutional guilt at every turn, all the while anti-white sentiment and antisemitism have surged to horrifying levels on your watch. Jewish Londoners living in fear, synagogues needing extra security, streets filled with chants that call for their destruction. You downplay it, equivocate, and let the marches roll on with kid gloves.
Two-tier policing has gone off the charts with police being harsh on some protests, soft on others depending on the identity or cause. Native Londoners and white working-class communities feel abandoned and demonized, while certain groups get a free pass.
Your own office even put out garbage claiming a White family "doesn't represent real Londoners." You've fanned the flames of resentment instead of demanding assimilation, excellence, and color-blind law and order.
So sorry, but London *was* a powerhouse, but that was before your tenure. It's not anymore.
In 1946, a young Lee Kuan Yew stepped off the boat into a battered London still licking its wounds from war.
Amid the mess, he witnessed something miraculous - an unsupervised newspaper stall at Piccadilly Circus. People stopped, dropped their coins, took their paper, and walked on. There was no attendant, no fear of theft.
“This,” he thought, “is civilisation. A high-trust society where men police themselves.”
He carried that vision home.
In the 1960s, as Singapore stumbled out of colonial rule - poor, swampy, fractious - Lee vowed to forge his city state into that London he saw first hand.
Over time, Lee transformed Singapore into an orderly, courteous, disciplined, garden of trust rising from a chaotic swamp.
Now the tables have turned as London, once the beacon, slides into low-trust decay. It's only accelerated under your leadership. It went from high-trust to low-trust to now, negative trust.
There's actually a huge trust deficit now.
The former colony has now surpassed its former colonial master as the latter forgot how to govern.
Singapore actually has the playbook. Since you're there, you might as well learn from the best.
1
37
Exactly
the purpose is not to remove young people from the internet. the purpose is to remove anonymity from the internet in a country where the government routinely punishes dissent with jail. the british caliphate is no longer free.
1,843
9,982
66,560
15,451,419
This is how it's done. There are dozens of false and defamatory statements from politicians, academics and journalists about @elonmusk on here every day. I hope he's archiving them, he's going to need his own law firm to file all the suits.
During the lawsuit against them, we will find out exactly which cretin wrote this terrible lie
30
This is the Indian migrant worker business model globally. I've seen it in Singapore, Japan, Taiwan and Hong Kong. Singapore cracked down. In NZ, our immigration service doesn't even ask why so many Indians are driving Uber. The New Zealand Immigration authorities are either corrupt or they're muppets. Either way, it's a house that needs cleaning. @nzfirst @NewZealandMFA
Another Indian "CEO" fraudulently took $100k from Indian individual for a lucrative tech jobs and later asked him to pay his own salary to keep the visa status intact (This is known as "benching").
They're still gaming the system. breitbart.com/immigration/20…
10
182
Max "Trevor Down at the Pub" Waters retweeted
I couldn't be happier to welcome the singular @DouglasKMurray to @TheFP as a weekly columnist.
thefp.com/p/douglas-murray-j…
2,087
1,368
14,881
487,273
Max "Trevor Down at the Pub" Waters retweeted
Tommy Robinson has just walked out of court with a victory that is already being called one of the most explosive free-speech moments in Britain.
The terrorism-related case against him — linked to his refusal to hand over his phone PIN to UK police — was thrown out after the judge ruled the stop unlawful and reportedly said Robinson had been targeted because of his political views.
This was not just about a phone. This was about power, politics, journalism, and whether the state can treat someone like a national security threat simply because it dislikes what they say.
Robinson says he refused to unlock his phone to protect journalistic sources. The state treated it as a terrorism matter. The court, according to Robinson’s reaction, saw something far more disturbing: political targeting.
Then came the detail that made the story explode worldwide: **Elon Musk reportedly helped finance Robinson’s legal defense**, stepping in where others stayed silent and turning the case into a global battle over free expression. Robinson thanked Musk publicly, asking why it had taken an American businessman to fight for justice in Britain.
“First of all, thank you, Elon Musk,” Robinson said, before adding that he was targeted because of his political beliefs and that counterterrorism police were allegedly used to get access to his phone as a journalist.
For supporters, this ruling is a brutal warning to the establishment: if terrorism powers can be used against controversial speech today, who will be next tomorrow? Critics will still call Robinson divisive, but this case has forced a bigger question onto the table — do rights only apply to people the government likes?
532
8,436
27,635
400,326
Max "Trevor Down at the Pub" Waters retweeted
Case Study of H-1B Nepotism:
How is it statistically possible that
A H-1B guy
his 2 cousins
their cousins spouses
all end up working in Intel?
How many Americans that you know where entire family end up working in high paying jobs in the same company?
42
491
1,455
20,292
Max "Trevor Down at the Pub" Waters retweeted
Read again @ChrisPenknz
"Negotiated in secret, votes secured before the public reads it, examined by a committee that has never changed the outcome."
Academic research by Thomas Riley (Public Interest Law Journal of NZ, 2018) found that no select committee treaty-examination report has ever been formally debated in the House. Not once.
Once signed, rejecting the enabling legislation puts NZ in breach of its international obligations. Parliament's vote on FTA legislation is not a genuine check - it is, as Riley concluded, a 'rubber stamp' on a decision the Executive has already made. Mr Penk, you know this.
FTA's put immense pressure on MPs to vote in favour because of their purported economic value. None of the items I've pointed to would pass a vote on their own. But now you have the leverage of your party leader vowing to pass it, before your constituents read the text - before the select committee heard public submissions. This is not the democratic process those items deserve.
Yes, that rubber stamp ratification comes later and I did not state otherwise.
The person posting that is confused and wrong: ratification only occurs when and if Parliament has voted through legislation to effect the terms of the Agreement.
2
19
104
1,153
This is the Indian H-1B business model.
Lawsuit: Indian H-1B Worker Paid Indian CEO $100K for Job in United States -- Michigan
breitbart.com/immigration/20…
1
1
37
You don't mind being a bystander when children are getting taped or stabbed though, do you? I don't know how you sleep at night.
I am simply not prepared to be a bystander when the safety and happiness of our children are at stake.
We will ban social media access for under 16s, and give children their childhoods back.
Read more about it here: keirstarmer.substack.com/p/g…
ALT Prime Minister Keir Starmer gives a press conference about keeping children safe online.
Community note
The platforms, like Apple iOS/iPadOS/macOS, Android, Google Chrome and Microsoft Windows have parental controls that give parents the tools needed to restrict or block underage children access to social media.
support.apple.com/en-us/105121
families.google/familylink/
support.microsoft.com/en-us/family-s…
Banning will just encourage VPN usage
1
15
Max "Trevor Down at the Pub" Waters retweeted
Many Indians emigrate to the United States and other Western countries because they find key aspects of life in India is terrible — including climate, infrastructure, governance, hygiene, safety, morality, and levels of trust.
One of the first things many Indians do after arriving in America is try to remake it like India by importing boatloads of more Indians and creating the same failed culture here in America.
Assimilation is a myth — especially at this scale.
The first wave of Indian immigrants consisted mostly of IIT graduates and other elite, highly skilled top Uni. students.
They assimilated well, contributed significantly to American society, committed virtually no crimes, and built an excellent reputation.
Subsequent waves, however, consist of average Indians who are mostly opposite of the first wave.
As a result, West is done with Indian immigration.
Either we need to return to first-wave style immigration—selecting top talent from IITs, IIMs, BITS etc—or end Indian immigration altogether because current Indian immigration works negatively for all of us here.
34
95
587
26,240
Not sure how he could make it any plainer. @chrisluxonmp
Jun 14
Come to India.
Work with us.
Design in India.
Develop in India.
And create solutions for the world.
@BharatInnov2026
17
Do they even hear themselves?
Jun 14
MASS MIGRATION: Today, Home Affairs minister Tony Burke said we need 400,000 new migrants a year to “build the houses”. “If we cut migration, we won’t be able to build the houses”. Watch
1
10
189
Max "Trevor Down at the Pub" Waters retweeted
New Zealand, we have a problem
17
118
330
2,187
Max "Trevor Down at the Pub" Waters retweeted
Jun 14
Yep. UK is disgusting, disgraceful and fallen under the totalitarian @UKLabour & @Keir_Starmer
And what the hell do police there think they are doing? How do they see this as acceptable policing not what it is: thuggery. And after Henry Nowak @metpoliceuk
Jun 14
🇬🇧 Video of British police arresting a crying 5-year-old boy while he was walking alongside them as they detained his father is going viral.
They shoved the terrified little kid into the back of their patrol car like trash. When his mother, baby still clutched in her arms, rushed to rescue her son, these thugs pushed her back and ordered her to stand down.
This is the UK in 2026.
Absolutely disgusting!
1
5
32
545
Max "Trevor Down at the Pub" Waters retweeted
43000 Muslims on the Terror Watchlist and the government/mainstream media are trying to make Tommy Robinson the face of terrorism.
They think we’re all stupid.
They’re playing an old game in a new world.
The times have changed wankers, we see you.
83
2,630
13,183
71,395
A standard deviation on the IQ bell curve is 15-16 points depending on the test. If you doubt IQ is real, go have a conversation with someone >2 SD up or down from yourself. You'll find the conversation peters out pretty quickly. >2 SD down and you'll feel like you're talking to a cow. >2 up and you'll think you're talking to an alien. IQ is also very steady over time barring disease or injury. I was tested at age 13 and again at age 27 and again at 50. Same score every time.
Of all the forms of denial, the IQ deniers are among the most puzzling. While no one has their IQ tattooed on their forehead, it doesn't take much interaction to get a pretty good idea on how smart somebody is, and to say that anyone can learn anything is patent nonsense. A person with an IQ of less than 80 isn't ever going to master astrophysics, or learn much of anything else requiring complex thought processes. Above 80 but below 100, a person is trainable but probably isn't going to master a skilled trade. Between 100 and 120, the world of learning is open but medical school would still be a challenge. Above 120, a person can learn pretty much anything given time and effort. At the rarified reaches of 140 , the sky is the limit. I have a friend in that range. I'm reasonably bright, but talking to him I almost understand how my dog must feel when I talk to it.
hotair.com/david-strom/2026/…
21