Joined January 2014
194 Photos and videos
no offense dude but you GOTTA be blocked
85
Sharon Street
Name a philosopher you consider genuinely brilliant โ€” even a genius โ€” but whose views you strongly disagree with. I'll go first! Thomas Aquinas.
229
Even if opposing the mass torture and slaughter of hundreds of billions of animals every year was ableist, classist, or even racist, that would not make me doubt that I should oppose said mass torture and slaughter. It would introduce the surprising concept of justified bigotry
Replying to @hfkzelda
thank you for proving that veganism is a privilege and nearly 100% of vegans are racist, classist ableist
2
251
this is the intellectual capacity of the red pressing devils
Replying to @TheCartoonLoon
How is red "cynical"? Rather, pressing blue is a symptom of bad cooperation. More than 50% pressing blue achieves nothing. It doesn't cure cancer. It only prevents a tragedy created by the act of pressing blue. Why would you ever do that?
150
Ostrich ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
In a world that often feels deeply polarized, it is rare to find a topic where almost everyone agrees. The treatment of farm animals is one of them. Surveys across many countries show that a strong majority of people, regardless of their diet, oppose common practices in animal agriculture. In the chart you can see survey data from the UK. Given these surveys, and with the increasing availability of plant-based meat alternatives, one might expect people in these countries to be shifting away from consuming animal products. But the data shows a different story. At a global level, meat consumption is not only high but also increasing. Each year, hundreds of billions of land animals, fish, and crustaceans are farmed and killed to produce food. There is a clear gap between what people want โ€” meat produced without suffering โ€” and what the food system delivers. Understanding this gap is the first step to closing it. In a new article, Pablo Rosado makes the case that one of the biggest opportunities of our generation is to build a system where the food we eat reflects the values we already hold.
29
156
484
113,871
this is the equivalent of those grammatical errors in phishing emails. This guy's not thinking that women in general like this, he's trying to figure out whether you are vulnerable to malign manipulation.
Imagine leaving a first date and getting a performance review ๐Ÿ˜ญ
116
Me when I invert the assumptions behind the system I am critiquing by exactly 180 degrees as a little joke
Note that since we are all identical (under the skin), and all born with an identical soul from the standard Antechamber of Souls, the same lives would work well for all of us. Yes I am a Liberal and believe in Science
1
267
the dreaded platonist hegelian
Okay
194
Ostrich ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
I tried to do what we call, if I may be so bold, a "conceptual scoop"!! Pls read my story on the most overlooked form of extreme confinement of farm animalsโ€”the routine caging of dairy calves in tiny crates less than 1/10 the size of a parking spot. It's not about veal! (๐Ÿงต)
18
158
492
34,798
Ostrich ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
Letโ€™s not worry about whether this is an *obvious* joke; all that matters is that this is a standard amount of obviousness for a joke on twitter, so if you donโ€™t find it obvious (which is okay!) you should probably keep that in mind going forward
Deeply concerned at the sheer volume of people who didn't instantly realize this was a joke
1
3
40
3,644
But how would Hans-Hermann Hoppe feel if he hadn't had breakfast today
"No rights can be derived 'from behind a veil of ignorance' because no one lives behind such a thing except epistemological zombies, and only a Rawlsian zombie ethic can be derived from behind it." -Hans-Hermann Hoppe, in the Austrian Economics Newsletter (1988).
1
2
254
This is real btw
NEW: White Dragon spotted in China
Community note
Gang you're not gonna believe this but this is AI slop gijn.org/resource/guideโ€ฆ
1
171
Ostrich ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
Nice reply "owning" me, unfortunately you parsed 2 levels of irony but missed completely the third, wherein it's clear I'm making fun of the persona your reply intended to critique. That being said I'm still hurt to an almost unimaginable degree
40
2,222
22,162
555,568
I am always saying this
Kleeโ€™s diagrams are great for grasping Deleuzian diagrammatics in that they reveal a pre-figurative logic of forces/vectors/differential relations that generate form on an immanent plane rather than function representationally, clarifying the diagram as a genetic operator. (1/4)
280
My philosophy in a tweet, as things stand: Ontology: see below Epistemology: Transcendental Idealism Philosophy of Religion: N/A Theology: Neoplatonist bullshit Politics: Communist Moral Philosophy: Kantian deontology Meta-ethics: Get back to me on this on Tuesday
My philosophy in a tweet, as things stand: Ontology: Reductive Physicalism Epistemology: Pragmatics Philosophy of Religion: Metaphysical Naturalism Theology: Taoism Politics: Leftist Moral Philosophy: Rule-Consequentialism Meta-ethics: Ethical Non-Naturalism
2
325
note how bluesky is imminently screenshottable
19 Nov 2025
iโ€™m crying i just found out people on bluesky are calling this joke transphobic
2
1,319
This whole affair has given me information about the intellectual integrity of one analytic undergrad as well as about that of a hundred continentals on this platform
Honestly, Iโ€™m impressed. He was able to cherry pick misleading quotes quite well. I didnโ€™t know analytics could read!!!!
1
909
My philosophical evolution in 7 steps, and yours? 1. Schopenhauer 2. Kant 3. Parfit 4. Korsgaard 5. Nagel 6. Jean Hampton 7. Flo
My philosophical evolution in 7 steps, and yours?: 1. German Idealism 2. Kierkegaard/ Karl Jaspers/ Wittgenstein 3. Swinburne 4. Aristotelian Scholasticism 5. Anselm/ Plantinga 6. Platonism 7. Just normal analytic philosophy (though still incorporating a lot from 4.-6.)
2
774
Ostrich ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
Iโ€™ve mostly abandoned this platform and moved to BlueSky. But what happened in Rio de Janeiro on Tuesday was too important not to share here too. This is a long thread on the police massacre in Rio. Please, take sometime to read it and consider retweeting. 1/22
41
2,085
3,948
764,287