The APPALLING Reality Of Child Care | @EricaKomisarCSW #children #daycare #childcare #abuse

A bit of wisdom on my birthday after forty four trips around the sun... If you love God, America, and are faithful to your family, friends and business associates, good things happen. Most of the adversity you will face isn't personal. The majority of humans live without being mindful of others... don't personalize it, forgive them. I know this is going to come as a surprise but you aren't perfect. You're going to screw up, fail, make mistakes and at times embarrass yourself. No big deal. Forgive yourself and move on. It's part of living. God is real. If you choose to dialogue with the almighty he absolutely will answer you, but it's up to you to recognize his messages however he may choose to send them. Purpose is everything. When you live with it, and stay loyal to your God given calling, you will never feel lost. Laugh. A lot. Reality is far funnier and more ironic than most people realize. The tapestry of life, and God's plan absolutely includes a healthy amount of humor to help you develop humility and character.

Due to the Australian sex discrimination commissioners interpretation of the law women are having to: • Go to the high court to reestablish that we are still included in the legislation that was created specifically for us • Lesbians have to go to a tribunal for a second time to reestablish that heterosexual men are not lesbians • A woman is being dragged through a state tribunal for saying that men who claim to be women cannot breastfeed • Women are losing both employment & volunteer positions for asserting the *fact* that men are not women • A woman is appealing a $95,000 fine for using publicly available information to inform people that there are men in women’s sport • Women are being threatened with punishment if they don’t compete with the men in sport • School aged girls are not drinking water at school - or not attending at all for the week of their period - so they don’t have to use unisex bathrooms • Women currently & formally in prison are revealing the sexual assaults they have experienced due to men who claim to be women locked in cells with them The current *interpretation* of Australia’s sex discrimination act - accepted by the full federal court for reasons known only to them - is not creating less discrimination. In fact, it’s creating much more. Interestingly, it’s simultaneously proving that everyone knows exactly who the women & girls actually are, because we’re the ones being punished. Gender ideology has failed and is being rejected in almost every other country it attempted to thrive within. It has brought down the careers of many politicians who didn’t have the metaphorical balls to acknowledge reality and fix the problem. To think that Australian is any different is as ignorant as it is insane. This is not a “culture war”, @AlboMP. It’s a war on women & girls.

#BREAKING It can be revealed that Minister for Veterans' Affairs Matt Keogh has claimed $361,782.63 in expenses in the first three months of 2026. This includes billing taxpayers more for a single luxury return trip for his wife than the original annual travel allowance he scrapped for the grieving parents of a war hero. Keogh axed the annual travel budget for Victoria Cross recipient, Cameron Bairds parents, who used the $2,600 budget to travel to Victoria Cross events in honour of their deceased son, who was killed in combat fighting for Australia on the battlefield of Afghanistan in 2013. The Baird family were left "staggered" when the cash was withdrawn suddenly by Veterans’ Affairs Minister Matt Keogh. Mr Keogh could not find room in the budget for Doug and Kaye's Baird’s expenditure, but he certainly found room for himself, spending more than $350,000 of taxpayer money on his own travel in the first three months of 2026. His salary is another $380,000 a year on top of what he's spending on entitlements. This is a national disgrace and Matt Keogh must resign today. And Anthony Albanese must restore the Baird family’s entitlements. But given his disdain for our Military veterans, that won’t be happening anytime soon.

Keir Starmer does NOT want the World to see how badly British Patriots want their country back Would be a shame if it went viral on 𝕏

Aujourd'hui je déconstruis la déconstruction. La déconstruction est le virus mental le plus efficace jamais conçu contre une civilisation. Il a été fabriqué en France entre 1966 et 1980 par trois hommes : Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze. Il a été exporté aux États-Unis, hybridé avec le puritanisme racial américain, et il est revenu trente ans plus tard sous le nom de wokisme paralyser l'Occident entier. Voici comment il fonctionne, et pourquoi il faut le détruire. La thèse est simple. Toute vérité n'est qu'un rapport de pouvoir déguisé. Tout texte sacré, toute loi, toute science, toute norme, toute hiérarchie, toute identité, toute institution cache en réalité une domination. Déconstruire, c'est montrer le rapport de force sous le vernis du vrai. C'est arracher le masque. C'est "démasquer". Formulé comme ça, ça paraît inoffensif. Voire utile. Qui n'aime pas un peu d'esprit critique ? Le piège est là. La déconstruction se présente comme une méthode. Elle est en réalité une ontologie. Elle ne dit pas seulement "interrogeons les normes", elle dit "il n'y a *que* des rapports de pouvoir". La différence est civilisationnelle. Une société qui interroge ses normes reste debout. Une société qui croit que ses normes ne sont *rien d'autre* que de la domination s'effondre. Parce qu'elle ne peut plus rien défendre. Plus une frontière, plus une loi, plus une science, plus une langue, plus une histoire, plus une biologie, plus une famille. Tout devient suspect. Tout devient négociable. Tout devient "construit donc déconstructible". C'est la première raison pour laquelle c'est un virus. Il s'auto-réplique. Une fois inoculé, il transforme tout ce qu'il touche en cible. La science est patriarcale, donc déconstruisons-la. Le langage est colonial, donc réinventons-le. La méritocratie est raciste, donc abolissons-la. Le sexe est une construction, donc choisissons-le. Il n'y a plus de roc. Tout est sable. Deuxième raison. Le virus est *non-falsifiable*. Si vous défendez une norme, c'est que vous êtes l'oppresseur. Si vous niez être oppresseur, c'est la preuve de votre privilège inconscient. Si vous citez des faits, vos faits sont contaminés par le pouvoir qui les a produits. Si vous citez la raison, la raison elle-même est blanche, masculine, occidentale. Il n'y a aucune sortie possible. Le système est conçu pour rendre toute objection irrecevable par définition. C'est exactement la structure d'une secte. Et c'est exactement ce qui s'est installé dans les universités, les RH, les médias, les administrations, les conseils d'administration depuis vingt ans. Troisième raison. Le virus s'auto-réfute mais ne s'auto-détruit pas. Si toute vérité est pouvoir, alors la phrase "toute vérité est pouvoir" est elle-même du pouvoir, donc sans valeur. Logiquement, la déconstruction se mord la queue dès la première phrase. Mais elle s'en moque. Parce qu'elle n'a jamais cherché la cohérence. Elle cherche l'efficacité politique. Et son efficacité politique est immense. Elle désarme ses ennemis et arme ses militants. Elle paralyse le défenseur et libère l'attaquant. C'est une arme asymétrique parfaite. Quatrième raison. Le virus produit des humains diminués. Une génération entière a appris à déconstruire et n'a jamais appris à construire. Elle sait soupçonner, jamais admirer. Elle voit le pouvoir partout et la beauté nulle part. Elle peut produire mille pages sur le caractère opprimant de Shakespeare et zéro ligne qui vaille la peine d'être lue dans cent ans. Elle a confondu l'intelligence critique avec la pose critique. Elle est stérile par construction. Un esprit nourri à la déconstruction est un esprit qui ne sait plus rien édifier. Cinquième raison, la plus grave. Une civilisation se tient debout sur trois piliers. La croyance qu'une vérité est accessible à la raison. La croyance qu'un bien se distingue d'un mal. La croyance qu'un héritage mérite d'être transmis. La déconstruction a méthodiquement dynamité les trois. Pas par méchanceté. Par jeu intellectuel, par fascination du soupçon, par haine de la bourgeoisie qui avait nourri ses prophètes. Mais le résultat est là. Une civilisation qui ne croit plus en sa vérité, ni en son bien, ni en son héritage ne se défend pas. Elle s'excuse en attendant la fin. Voilà ce qu'on a fait. Voilà ce qu'il faut nommer. La bonne nouvelle, c'est qu'un virus mental ne survit que tant qu'on lui cède l'autorité du discours. Il meurt dès qu'on cesse de jouer son jeu. Dès qu'on réaffirme tranquillement qu'il existe une vérité, un beau, un bien, un héritage. Dès qu'on cesse de demander la permission aux déconstructeurs pour bâtir. Dès qu'on refait. Dès qu'on transmet. Dès qu'on crée. Les bâtisseurs ont toujours le dernier mot sur les commentateurs. Toujours. Parce qu'à la fin il reste ce qui est construit, et rien de ce qui a été déconstruit. Alors aujourd'hui je déconstruis la déconstruction. Et demain je construis.

It is the day after #GigglevTickle and I haven’t woken up believing that men can be women. You can try & punish me for not believing it, but you can never make me believe it. Men cannot be women.

Can someone try switching Australia off and back on again? #IStandwithSallGrover

With all due respect, it just isn’t that simple. I say this has someone who has been in federal court for 4.5 years, costing over $1million in legal fees, standing up against trans ideology & men who claim to be women in female spaces. If it was as easy as you’re saying, the ideology wouldn’t be as dangerous or powerful as it is. Trans ideology is psychological abuse, it has weaponized empathy & forced people to accept the most obvious bullsh*t. No one believes a man can be a woman on their own accord for no reason. Literally no one. Recently in Australia, a woman athlete has managed to get a message to media anonymously explaining that a woman’s football club has told all of the members that they will be punished if they forfeit matches against the team that has 5 men (who claim to be women) on it. Another woman has been found guilty of vilification & ordered to pay $95,000 in damages for bringing attention to the fact there are men in that football competition. So the women in the competition are being told they will be punished while fully aware that a woman already has been, to the tune of $95,000. (@KirralieS is appealing the decision & continues to fight against this ideology after years of being dragged through the courts). That’s what they’re looking down the barrel at. So, they’ve done the next best thing: anonymous media report. No one in power has done anything to help them. Nothing. The organization that should help them - the Australian Human Rights Commission- won’t, because it is corrupted with gender ideology. I know this because they’re fighting in federal court against me fighting for female only spaces. So, do I wish that every woman in the world would speak up against trans ideology? Of course. But I understand why many don’t because I understand the ideology and manipulative power that it has.

Slovak MEP Milan Mazurek in the European Parliament: "We constantly hear in this room how Black lives matter, how Jewish lives matter, how Palestinian lives matter and I completely agree with you. I have no problem with you saying that. But I will say something that many of you will have a problem with, and I will say it loudly and openly: White Lives Matter! Because right now, White people are the most hated group in the whole world, everything is allowed against White people, you can openly spread hatred and racism against White people. You can openly call for violence against White people and nobody will ban you from social media networks, nobody will prosecute you or put you in jail for that. But if you say 'White Lives Matter,' they will try to destroy you. And that's why I consider it very important to repeat that for you as a White man, as a Christian father of the family: White Lives Matter."

“The [Australian] government: you bet on the wrong race. You backed men who claim to be women over women’s fundamental rights & now you look stupid. You virtue-signalled so blindly that you’ve been left at the starting blocks in your gender-delusion costume while the IOC…”

Holy crap. What a fkn dirtbag.... This story is either false, or very incriminating evidence that the mainstream media in this country are entirely useless.

CELINE-2 ESAFETY-0 MY RESPONSE. It's been a crazy week. I just wanted to give my two cents on the aftermath of my Federal Court win, the media coverage and what we can do. My case sets a precedent for what Australians can and can't see online. This case proves at the FEDERAL level that our online safety regulator routinely acts outside her legal powers, and I would like to see some actual change come out of this. eSafety relies on what they call "informal notices" to get content removed online. To put it simply, these are takedown notices dressed up as informal notices. Often sent to a social media company's legal team, they are an illegal tactic used by eSafety to pressure social media companies to remove content that they deem "harmful," even if it does not meet the requirements under the Online Safety Act. My case definitively proves that eSafety staff knowingly send these informal notices when they are fully aware that the content does not meet the requirements to be censored. That is why this case matters. Share this video, and my case, far and wide to any and all politicians as this affects everyone regardless of whether you're left, right, middle, whatever. Australia does not need to be censored by an unelected WEF puppet. Sack Julie-Inman Grant. 🇦🇺♥️

🇺🇸Good Morning America🇺🇸

George Orwell: It began unobtrusively, almost politely. A post here and there disappeared—quietly, without explanation or ceremony. An article was removed from circulation, then another. Each absence was small enough to be dismissed, each deletion subtle enough to avoid resistance. Nothing was announced; nothing was debated. Silence, after all, rarely provokes outrage. In time, the pattern became more ambitious. A full news outlet vanished from the public sphere. Care was taken, of course. This particular outlet had permitted voices that questioned authority, and that alone made it dangerous. Yet its removal could not appear ideological. It had to be justified, reframed as a protective measure—necessary for public order, for social harmony, for the safety of children. History had shown that the public rarely resists when restrictions are presented as safeguards. People will surrender almost anything if they are told it is for their own good. And so they did. Freedom of expression was not seized in a single, dramatic act. It was eroded incrementally, diluted until it no longer resembled the right it once was. The public did not protest because they did not perceive the loss. What is taken slowly, invisibly, is rarely mourned. By the time the absence is felt, the language to describe it has already been censored. What remained was a carefully managed narrative—one that served not the public, but the authority itself. Safety became the justification; control, the objective. And those who might have spoken out found that the space to do so had quietly, efficiently, and irrevocably disappeared.

Persians are taking down the Islamic Regime in Iran; Not a single protest in support in the West. Not a single rally on any campus. No mentions from MSM. You wouldn't even know what these brave people are doing without social media and X. Propaganda is curated and funded.

More than 217 protesters were murdered in the past two days in Tehran alone. Let that sink in.

A terrorist on a student visa kills 15 people in Bondi. The government's response? Restrict the rights of Australian citizens. Not tighter visa controls. Not better enforcement of existing laws. Their only solution is you losing your freedoms.

The ABC have finally conceded that their reporting of our new research, Delivering a High Energy Australia got it wrong. For those who haven’t been tracking the story, on Monday night on 7.30, the ABC deliberately misrepresented our report that led to the National Party abandoning Net Zero in an attempt to discredit our thorough research into the Australian energy market, net zero policies, and their effects on households, businesses and our environment. Our paper, Delivering a High Energy Australia, is a meticulous, evidence-based discussion paper built on more than 160 detailed references. It lays out, in full, how Net Zero is driving up energy prices, crippling Australian industry - and what we can do about it. But instead of engaging with the facts, the ABC tried to smear our work by claiming that our modelling came from Coal Australia. This is blatantly false. Our energy numbers both in this report, and the report we released earlier in the year have come from analysis of a number of sources, including but not limited to; the CSIRO, CIS, AEMO, Australian Energy Regulator, Australian Bureau of Statistics, DCCEEW, Net Zero Australia, Arche Energy, Adept Economics, the World Bank and the International Energy Agency. It also contained our own internal calculations based on publicly available data, and this too was made clear in both the body of the report and in the footnotes. The modelling Coal Australia commissioned from clean energy advisory firm Arche Energy merely reinforced our earlier findings, which is why we cited the work as an additional, supplementary reference in the report. And the ABC knew this. Before going to air, they reached out to us for clarification, and we made this clear. Yet despite knowing the truth, they ran the false claim anyway, and in doing so they knowingly misled their audience to cast doubt on legitimate research. The ABC needed to be held accountable and we demanded a full retraction and apology. On Wednesday afternoon, the ABC responded: "We acknowledge that it was appropriate to include your response in our reporting, indicating that your coal estimates were informed by the centre’s earlier research. We also understand that your report relied on multiple sources, as detailed in your earlier correspondence. To address your concerns and our failure to include your comments, we will include an Editor’s Note on the 7.30 website in the following terms: “Page Research provided us with a statement prior to the broadcast about its report to the National Party on a proposed energy future, which was not included in the 7.30 story. Page told 7.30: ‘Our coal estimates were informed by an earlier piece of research we undertook in January this year” as well as additional sources. Page also said it included the analysis contained in “Coal Australia AEMO Submission (Source 152 & 155) as their subsequent modelling reinforced our earlier findings in the modelling we had commissioned in January”. Matt Kean provided his opinion on the politics of the net zero issue in our report. He is the chairman of the Climate Change Authority, and a director and head of fundraising at Wollemi Capital, a clean energy investor. These roles should have been disclosed in our report” Despite this concession, unfortunately the damage has already been done. The false claim that our modelling came from Coal Australia has already been repeated in other media outlets and spread like wildfire on social media. The ABC’s disclaimer on an old story does little to unwind the viral spread of disinformation about our organisation. Australians deserve to hear the truth, have the opportunity to discuss and debate new and evidenced based ideas, and make informed, educated decisions about the future trajectory of our country - not be misled by taxpayer-funded lies designed to undermine real, legitimate research.

How the Climate Change Fraud of the Century was carried out by Michael Mann - so simple, wasn't it?