In Christ there is neither Jew, Greek nor gentile. 🙏🙏

The fact that two people have different interpretations for the same scripture doesn't inherently mean that one is wrong. But there's a difference between what scriptures say and what they do not say

A time comes when men will no longer come to Jerusalem to pray A time comes when true worshippers will worship the Father in spirit and in truth Wherever two or three are gathered in my name, I will be in their midst. Christ is the END of the law Every child of God knows this

Children of the flesh.

This maybe a very unpopular opinion but I think looking down on people because of their race or skin color is a demonstration of low cognitive ability. Sadly, this is so common among religious people. Be born again!

Behold the first fruit of the gay cult of Constantine

Both. We pray with knowledge.

John 3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God. Argue all you want, it comes down to this ☝️YOU MUST BE BORN-AGAIN. NO ONE is part of Christ's TRUE church who has not been regenerated

I don't move around with postcards in my wallet I don't move around with statues and Hindu beads in my pockets I don't move around with a bible on my chest either. I move around with the living word of God in my spirit. That's what it means to be a born again child of God

The meaning of "fallen away from grace" is clearly written "you are brought to nothing and so separated from Christ...." That is seeking justification by works of the law means you're running parallel to grace

Men, listen up. You will be judged by God's written WORD alone. Not anything any man tells you, whether you're RC, Orthodox, Protestant, Reformed, etc. DO NOT listen to ANYONE without personal confirmation from God's WORD.

We've been searching for the name of your church on this list since 325AD

Attention Ecclesiolaters and institutional idolators: The gospel put to death centralized institutional authoritarianism. Notice how Roman Catholics and EO (and others) quietly redefine the word “church” in the middle of an argument? No one denies the existence of a visible church. Christians gather, preach, baptize, ordain elders, exercise discipline, preserve doctrine, and transmit the faith through history. What is denied is the Ecclesiolater ‘s completely unproven leap from “the church carries the faith” to “therefore the Church is now capitalized “C” and redefined as a singular infallible institution possessing binding interpretive authority over the faith.” That leap is nowhere established in Scripture AND that is EXACTLY the kind of institutional authoritarianism the gospel came to destroy. Scripture repeatedly undermines that exact kind of institutional absolutism. Temple Judaism already made the same type of claims. They had succession. They had Moses’ seat. They had the Temple. They had recognized authority structures. They claimed stewardship over divine revelation. They claimed infallible interpretive authority. And yet Christ and the apostles repeatedly 👉subordinated those institutional claims to the Word of God itself👈. Then Acts explodes the entire idea that authority is centralized in an untouchable institution. In Acts 6 the apostles appoint servants from among the congregation. In Acts 7 Stephen publicly rebukes the institutional leadership and declares that God does not dwell in temples made with hands. In Acts 8 persecution from the institutional authorities scatters the church, and the gospel spreads precisely through that scattering. The gospel put to death centralized institutional authoritarianism. The center of authority is not a protected institutional hierarchy. The center is the apostolic gospel found in Scripture itself. Ecclesiolater’s regurgitate their same circular problem. When asked how they know their institution is the true Church, they appeal back to the institution’s own claim of continuity and authority. That is institutional self authentication. And it immediately collapses because Rome, Eastern Orthodoxy, Oriental Orthodoxy, and the Assyrian Church all make the same continuity claims. So their appeal to “a concrete subject” proves absolutely nothing. Which institution? By what objective standard? And Scripture never tells believers to rest their certainty in a post apostolic infallible institution. Never Rom. 8:14 says the sons of God are led by the Spirit of God. 1 John 2:27 says the anointing abides in believers and teaches them concerning the truth. The Bereans tested even apostolic preaching by Scripture. Gal 1 says even an angel or an apostle is accursed for preaching another gospel. 1 Thess 5 commands believers to test all things. That only makes sense if the final norm above every institution is the apostolic Word found in Scripture itself. And their hierarchy argument also fails because bishops, overseers, elders, and presbyters are the same office in the NT. The shepherds are part of the flock, not a separate infallible class above it. Acts 20 uses elder and overseer interchangeably. And in Acts 20, who made them “overseers”? Where did the error come from? Titus 1 does the same. 1 Peter 5 has elders shepherding as fellow elders, not as monarchs ruling a centralized institution. So yes, there is a visible church. Yes, there are leaders. Yes, there is continuity. But none of that proves their redefined capital “C” Church centralized institution with infallible authority over the consciences of believers. The church is created by the apostolic gospel found in Scripture, governed by the apostolic gospel found in Scripture, corrected by the apostolic gospel found in Scripture, and always subject to the apostolic gospel found in Scripture. Not above it.

"Those last breaths, the breaths of life leaving you." Listen to this 1 minute clip. Everyone will experience this, many have witnessed it. I have. Everyone reading this has a certain number of breaths left to take. God knows the exact number you have left to take. You don't. Have you believed on Jesus Christ, the Son of God, been granted repentance, and born from above by God's Sovereign Grace? Does Christ's Spirit reside in the Temple of your body? I'm talking about are you "religious," but...are you "born again from above?" If your answer is "no," I implore you to fall on your face to the earth right now, and plead with the Sovereign LORD God to reveal Himself to you through Jesus Christ dieing for your sins on that Cross. Do it....NOW. Your breath countdown is ticking.

1 - Luther actually DID honor Mary - but NOT in the way the RC does. He ACTUALLY had a clear line between devotion & worship. The RC claims it does but it doesn't 2 - I'm glad you defer to Luther on things (I only did the first three. There are more, if you're interested)

2 Peter 1 (vv. 16-21) in context addresses the origin of Scripture. Peter contrasts the message with “cleverly devised myths,” cites his eyewitness account of the Transfiguration (vv. 16-18), and calls the “prophetic word” confirmed and worthy of attention “as to a lamp shining in a dark place” (v. 19). He then states: “no prophecy of Scripture comes from someone’s own interpretation. For no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit” (vv. 20-21). The immediate context explains Scripture’s divine source and reliability, not readers’ inability to read or understand it.

The work has been done by Jesus, why would you want to add to what was perfectly done.

He had to fulfill the law, so yes, He came for the people to whom the law was given. Everything else changed after that. It activated the original plan that had been in place before the foundation of the earth was laid. "In Christ, there is neither Jew, Greek nor gentile"

Roman Catholicism believes that men evolved from apes and the only thing God created is the soul. There is no gospel on the rosary. All born of Adam were born with original sin. No one needs the mental gymnastics of Iranaeus to prove that Mary was a sinner saved by grace.

There Is One Mediator — And It Is Not Mary Passage: 1 Timothy 2:5 - “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.” Introduction First Timothy 2:5 is one of those verses that does not ask permission from Rome before it speaks. It does not whisper. It does not leave a little side door open for a religious system to sneak Mary into the office of Christ. It says, “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.” One God. One Mediator. One Man. Christ Jesus. That is plain enough to make a theologian nervous and simple enough for a child to believe. The verse does not say there is one main Mediator and a softer motherly mediator underneath Him. It does not say there is one official Mediator and then Mary as a mediatrix of all graces. It does not say there is one Mediator in theory, while in practice frightened sinners should run to Mary because Jesus is too holy, too stern, or too far away. It says what it says, and Rome spends a great deal of time trying to make it say less than it says. The issue is not whether Mary was blessed. She was. The issue is not whether Mary was highly favoured. She was. The issue is not whether Mary had a unique place in the incarnation of the Lord Jesus Christ. She did. The issue is whether Scripture ever tells sinners to approach God through Mary. It does not. The issue is whether Scripture gives Mary the office of mediator. It does not. The issue is whether Scripture says Mary hears prayers, dispenses grace, intercedes for souls in heaven, or functions as a motherly channel of access to Christ. It does not. The Roman system gives Mary emotional and devotional functions that Scripture gives to Jesus Christ, then tries to calm everybody down by saying, “We do not worship her.” That is like a man stealing your house, sleeping in your bed, eating your food, wearing your clothes, and then saying, “Do not worry, I have great respect for your property rights.” The practice gives the game away. This essay is written for Catholics who love Mary but have been trained to run to her in a way the Bible never commands. You may have prayed “Hail Mary” since childhood. You may have held a rosary in fear, grief, sickness, or guilt. You may have been told Mary is your mother, your intercessor, your refuge, your helper, your advocate, or the tender heart that leads you to Jesus. But the Bible never tells you to come to Mary. The Bible tells you to come to Christ. Hebrews says we can come boldly unto the throne of grace. Ephesians says we have access by Christ. Romans says we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ. First Timothy says there is one Mediator between God and men. If God gave one Mediator, why did Rome train souls to seek another route? If Christ’s blood opened the way, why are Catholics told to take a Marian detour? The answer is painful, but plain: Rome’s devotion has blurred Christ’s office and placed Mary where the Bible never put her. Chapter One: One Means One, Unless a System Needs It to Mean More The verse says “one mediator.” Not two. Not one and a half. Not one supreme Mediator plus a subordinate mediatrix. Not one necessary Mediator and several helpful assistant mediators. One. Religious systems become experts at making simple words complicated when the simple words threaten the system. When the Bible says “one,” Rome says, “Yes, one, but…” And once that “but” enters the room, the verse gets buried under distinctions, categories, terms, and explanations until the average person no longer hears what God said. That is how false doctrine survives. It does not always deny the verse. It smothers the verse. Paul’s statement in 1 Timothy 2:5 is not a devotional suggestion. It is doctrinal truth. He grounds mediation in the oneness of God and the manhood of Jesus Christ. There is one God, and there is one Mediator between God and men. The one Mediator is not an angel. He is not a priest.