🇦🇺 X WINS: AUSTRALIA LIFTS BAN ON CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION FOOTAGE Free speech: 1. Government censorship: 0. Australia's Classification Review Board overturned the eSafety Commissioner's ban on videos showing the September 10 assassination of Charlie Kirk after X successfully appealed the ruling. The eSafety Commissioner had classified footage of Kirk's shooting and the stabbing of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska as "Refused Classification," meaning completely banned from all platforms in Australia. X fought back, arguing the Kirk video was "a neutral objective record of a notorious public event of historical and political significance that prompted extensive public discourse." The platform compared it to the Zapruder film of JFK's assassination. The Review Board agreed. Despite "the heinous nature of the event," the majority ruled the video was not gratuitous, exploitative, or offensive enough to justify a total ban. It was reclassified to R18 . Australia tried to memory-hole a political assassination. @elonmusk said no. The same government that banned teenagers from social media wanted to ban adults from seeing reality. Source: The Guardian / @GlobalAffairs

Elon Musk: "I think many in the public don't realize how much deception is really going on with the media."

JULIAN ASSANGE FILES CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST NOBEL FOUNDATION OVER “INSTRUMENT OF WAR” PEACE PRIZE WikiLeaks Founder Alleges 2025 Award to María Corina Machado Constitutes Misappropriation, Facilitation of War Crimes Under Swedish Law, Seeks Freeze of 11 million SEK ($1.18 million USD) of Pending Transfers to Machado STOCKHOLM — 11:00am CET December 17, 2025 Julian Assange today filed a criminal complaint in Sweden accusing 30 individuals associated with the Nobel Foundation, including its leadership, of committing serious suspected crimes, including the crime of gross misappropriation of funds, facilitation of war crimes and crimes against humanity, and the financing of the crime of aggression. The complaint shows that Alfred Nobel's 1895 will explicitly mandates that the peace prize go to the individual who during the proceeding year “conferred the greatest benefit to humankind” by doing “the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.” Assange argues that “The political decision of the Norwegian selection committee does not suspend the fiduciary duty of Swedish funds administrators”. “Any disbursement contradicting this mandate constitutes misappropriation from the endowment”. The complaint, submitted simultaneously to the Swedish Economic Crime Authority (Ekobrottsmyndigheten) and the Swedish War Crimes Unit (Krigsbrottsenheten), states that the suspects, including Nobel Foundation Chair Astrid Söderbergh Widding and Executive Director Hanna Stjärne, converted “an instrument of peace into an instrument of war,” through suspected “serious criminality” including: 1) Breach of trust, gross misappropriation and conspiracy in relation to the pending 11 million SEK ($1.18 million) disbursement of the Peace prize monies to Maria Corina Machado, whose prior and ongoing actions categorically exclude her from the criteria set out in Alfred Nobel's will; 2) Facilitation of war crimes, including the crime of aggression and crimes against humanity, breaching Sweden's obligations under Article 25(3)(c) of the Rome Statute, because the accused are aware of Machado's incitement and endorsement of the U.S. commission of international crimes, and knew or ought to have known that the disbursement of Nobel monies would contribute to extrajudicial killings of civilians and shipwrecked survivors at sea and are in breach of their obligation to cease disbursements. Assange notes that the members of the Nobel Foundation have previously exercised their supervisory authority over the prizes and their disbursements by withholding Literature Prize disbursements in 2018. “Failure to intervene here, despite U.S. war crimes off the Venezuelan coast and Machado’s key role in furthering aggression” incurs criminal liability. “Alfred Nobel's endowment for peace cannot be spent on the promotion of war,” Assange states. The accused have concrete legal obligations because they are tasked with “ensuring the fulfillment of the intended purpose of Alfred Nobel’s will, that is, to end wars and war crimes, and not to enable them.” MACHADO'S INCITEMENT OF THE LARGEST U.S. MILITARY BUILDUP SINCE THE IRAQ WAR MAKE HER CATEGORICALLY INELIGIBLE The complaint notes how the Nobel announcement and ceremony have occurred in what military analysts describe as “the largest U.S. military deployment in the Caribbean since the Cuban Missile Crisis”—now exceeding 15,000 personnel, including the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford. The escalation continues as President Trump announced on December 10, two days after the Nobel ceremony, that U.S. strikes would be “starting by land.” The Venezuela strategy is part of what Trump’s Secretary for War, Peter Hegseth, calls a shift toward “maximum lethality, not tepid legality” and “going on the offence”. Against this backdrop, Assange states that “Machado has continued to incite the Trump Administration to pursue its escalatory path”, including by entering into a conspiracy to give the U.S. administration access to $1.7 trillion in oil reserves and other natural resources through privatization once Maduro is ousted. “Using her elevated position as the recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, Machado may well have tipped the balance in favour of war, facilitated by the named suspects.” Assange states in the criminal complaint. The complaint lists evidence of this incitement of U.S. military intervention, as well as praising Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's conduct in Gaza. Her statements include: - “Military escalation may be the only way... the United States may need to intervene directly” (30 October 2025) - Machado called U.S. military strikes on civilian vessels, which have killed at least 95 people to date, “justified” and “visionary”. - Machado dedicated the prize to U.S. President Trump, because he “finally has put Venezuela... in terms of a priority for the United States national security” - Historical statements including 2014 testimony before U.S. Congress where she said: “The only path left is the use of force” The filing cites extensive third-party expert and institutional opposition to Machado receiving the award: - 21 Norwegian peace organizations declared: “Machado is the opposite of a peace laureate.” - Nobel Peace Prize laureate Adolfo Pérez Esquivel stated: “Giving the prize to someone who calls for foreign invasion is a mockery of Alfred Nobel's will.” - The Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO) confirmed Machado “has called for military intervention in Venezuela.” REQUESTED ACTION The complaint notes that “There is a real risk that the funds derived from Nobel’s endowment have been or will be intentionally or negligently diverted from their charitable purpose to facilitate aggression, crimes against humanity, and war crimes.” Assange requests that Swedish authorities: 1. Immediately freeze of the pending SEK 11,000,000 monetary prize transfer and any remaining related budget and secure return of the medal. 2. Investigate the named persons and Foundation officers and associated entities for breach of trust, facilitation of war crimes and crimes against humanity, and conspiracy. 3. Seize of board minutes, emails, group chats, financial records. 4. Interrogate Widding, Stjärne and other suspects. 5. Fully investigate domestically or refer the matter to the ICC (Rome Statute Art. 25(3)(c)). “This complaint seeks the immediate freezing of all remaining funds and a full criminal investigation lest the Nobel Peace Prize be permanently converted from an instrument of peace into an instrument of war,” Assange concludes.

Police don’t shoot Terrorist and seen hiding Random Hero disarms Terrorist Police shoot the random Hero who disarmed the Terrorist Turns out it was a Woman Police Officer who shot the Hero Weird.

“I said at the beginning of the vaccine rollout that I would not put that shit into my body…” Australian Senator Pauline Hanson went scorched earth on the Vaccine Tyrants that forced people to be injected with poison.

🚨 POLICE OFFICERS DID NOT RETURN FIRE AT TERRORISTS. An eyewitness says the shooting went on for nearly 20 minutes. Two attackers. Repeated reloads. Sustained fire into a crowd of civilians. And yet — according to that testimony — four armed police officers were present and did not return fire. That fact alone demands serious, immediate answers. Why was no return fire initiated? Were officers ordered to stand down? Were they waiting for authorisation? Were they inadequately equipped? Was there a command failure? These are not accusations. They are necessary questions when civilians are being shot for 20 minutes in a public space. Every second matters in an active shooter scenario. Every delay costs lives. If officers were prevented from acting, the public deserves to know who made that call and why. If they were unable to act, the public deserves to know what failed. Transparency is not optional after an event like this. Silence only deepens fear and erodes trust. The victims deserve truth. The public deserves answers.

Most of your life was given to you, not earned. That’s the part we never want to look at. The most honest kind of gratitude isn’t “I deserve this.” It’s “I was given a life millions will never get.” If your life is mostly a gift, not a reward—how are you using this precious gift?

Of course it's ALL Scripted👇

Tucker states the obvious. Albo’s been bought off.

It turns out “safe and effective” really meant “cancer and myocarditis”. And they all knew. Pure evil.

Hide Digital ID inside an age gate and pray nobody notices. Because the fastest way to make Australians accept Digital ID? Don’t announce it. Just require identity to: watch a YouTube video And by the time anyone notices, they’re already locked in. linkedin.com/posts/renee-m-3…

“Child safety” was the sales pitch. Mandatory Digital ID for every adult online is the product. This law doesn’t protect kids. Your browsing history becomes fair game once your identity becomes mandatory. Call it “child safety” all you want it’s still surveillance.

“Child safety” was the sales pitch. Mandatory Digital ID for every adult online is the product. When a government wants to spy on adults, it starts by pretending to “protect the children.” It’s the oldest playbook in the world.

They built a system that forces adults onto Digital ID, logs what they read, what they watch, who they talk to – then wrapped it in the language of ‘protecting children’. That’s not safety. That’s strategy. No privacy

If child safety was the goal, the law would target kids’ spaces. Instead it targets everything – search, socials, messaging, apps, AI. That’s not a child-safety architecture. That’s a population-control architecture. No more privacy

You can’t ‘verify children’ without identifying adults. That’s the whole trick. This law isn’t about kids. It’s about turning the entire internet into a Digital ID checkpoint. Privacy gone Rights diminished Paternalism on steroids

Haha gold 🤣

Albo's Social media ban has failed! Teens are spamming his TikTok defying the Australian Prime Minister. How will Albo react to this?

🤔