Watching the world. Remixing it into digital art and cinematic beauty.

Joined November 2022
492 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
Golden winged goddess floating through the cosmos wrapped in glowing ancient rings and coins 🪽 Ethereal beauty with massive cracked wings and that divine golden energy dripping from the sky. 🔥 #AIGirl #WingedGoddess #FantasyArt #AIArt #CelestialBeauty #GoldenAngel #MythicalWings #EpicFantasy
1
1
6
819
ObserveandCreate retweeted
Exclusive: I have seen OpenAI's audited financials for 2024 and 2025. In 2025, OpenAI had $13.07 billion in revenue and $34 billion in costs. $867 million of its revenue came from SoftBank, and $303 million came from Microsoft. wheresyoured.at/exclusive-op…
139
599
3,348
1,420,578
ObserveandCreate retweeted
META MOVES TO LIMIT EMPLOYEE AI USAGE AS COSTS REACH BILLIONS
218
765
9,018
1,088,895
ObserveandCreate retweeted
The AI bubble has already burst. That is exactly why so many companies are racing toward IPOs now. They want to sell at peak valuations before the financing problems, data center delays, power constraints, missed targets, and guidance cuts start hitting the market. This is not sustainable growth. This is insiders trying to cash out at the top before the crowd realizes the bubble is over. $NVDA $AMD $MU $AVGO $SMCI $ARM $TSM $ASML $META $MSFT $GOOGL $AMZN $ORCL $PLTR
Ray Dalio says there is an AI bubble and that it will eventually burst. I agree. AI capex is becoming increasingly difficult to justify. Companies are burning free cash flow, issuing stock, taking on debt and chasing returns that remain uncertain. Meanwhile, Chinese AI firms are offering competitive models at a fraction of U.S. pricing, putting even more pressure on the economics of the industry. OpenAI and Anthropic are fighting an expensive battle for market share while new competitors keep entering the field. This looks increasingly similar to every major technology bubble in history. Most investors still don’t see it. They will. $NVDA $AMD $MU $SMCI $AVGO $ARM $TSM $ASML $MRVL $ANET $QCOM $INTC $AMZN $MSFT $META $GOOGL $PLTR $AI $BBAI #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #StockMarket #Investing #Semiconductors #TechStocks #WallStreet #Bubble
33
292
1,083
60,468
ObserveandCreate retweeted
WATCH: @edzitron absolutely destroy the SpaceX, Anthropic and OpenAI IPOs in 5 minutes He explains why they're all trying to cash out because the entire AI narrative is a lie.
This is insane! They need to find a home for $86B worth of SpaceX $SPCX stock on day one They're planning to sell 30% to retail, normally 5% is risky The sheer size of this retail allocation is 150x times larger than any previous IPO in history 🤪 @TheCompoundNews @NoelKapela
89
587
3,585
351,496
ObserveandCreate retweeted
This is the best explanation of the AI bubble I've ever heard! 🤣 An instant classic of the insanity @atmoio

WATCH: @edzitron absolutely destroy the AI narrative by explaining these AI companies have no way to be profitable. (My personal theory is Elon Musk is rushing to take SpaceX public because he plans merge with Dario's Anthropic as a way to destroy Sam Altman)
33
280
1,559
166,515
ObserveandCreate retweeted
this company burns tens of billions a year and this is only a dodgy way of socializing the losses. It's a sign that OpenAI knows it's cooked, unclear what the stake would be, nor whether said stake would save it when the reaper arrives
Trump administration, OpenAI discussing possible government stake in the AI startup cnbc.com/2026/06/05/trump-op…
34
259
1,422
47,019
ObserveandCreate retweeted
The AI Bubble has lost wallstreetbets
236
908
16,280
819,404
ObserveandCreate retweeted
Jun 3
🚨 Sam Altman warns OpenAi and Anthropic are experiencing severe pullback on Ai spending as companies put significant restraints on spending to restrict costs. The company warns investors it’s the first time this has happened in Ai and something we never expected. The buildout costs aren’t sustainable to allow profitability to hyperscalers or end users. $soxx $dram
Sam Altman said AI budgeting has recently become a "huge issue" for some companies, something that "never came up" earlier this year. bit.ly/4uxIGnv
263
782
5,575
1,882,096
ObserveandCreate retweeted
Anthropic valuation: $965 Billion Walmart valuation: $926 Billion Anthropic revenue: $47 Billion Walmart revenue: $681 Billion
Jun 1
BREAKING: Anthropic submits draft to SEC for IPO
144
451
6,879
1,681,328
ObserveandCreate retweeted
When people say 'AI isn't a bubble because the technology isn't going away', it just shows they don't know what a bubble is. The internet didn't go away. Railways didn't go away. Tulips didn't go away. An asset can be overvalued, even if its useful.
179
820
3,497
223,292
ObserveandCreate retweeted
🚨Michael Burry just said Elon Musk and Nvidia's deal is built on fake numbers. Burry published a detailed breakdown calling the entire structure "Fugazi", his word for fake. He is alleging that billions of dollars in Nvidia chips are being hidden off balance sheets, and that American retirees are unknowingly funding the whole thing. Nvidia, the world's largest AI chip company sold $5.4 billion worth of its most advanced GPUs, the GB200, to a company called Valor. Valor is not a real operating business. It is a special purpose vehicle, a shell company created specifically to hold these chips and nothing else. Nvidia also invested $1.9 billion of its own money directly into Valor on top of the sale. Those 100,000 chips are now physically inside xAI's data center. xAI is Elon Musk's artificial intelligence company, the one that builds Grok. xAI is using every single one of those chips right now to run its AI models. But here is what Burry is flagging. Neither Nvidia nor xAI owns those chips on paper. Valor, the shell company holds legal title. That means $5.4 billion in GPU assets do not show up on Nvidia's balance sheet as inventory. They do not show up on xAI's balance sheet as assets. They are legally invisible to both companies. Nvidia gets to book the $5.4 billion as a completed sale and record it as revenue. xAI gets full use of the chips without owning them. And the risk disappears into a shell company in the middle. Now here is where American retirees enter the picture. Valor needed $3.5 billion in debt to fund this structure. Apollo provided it. Apollo is one of the largest asset managers on earth with $1.03 trillion under management and $834 billion specifically in private credit. Apollo raised the $3.5 billion, packaged it into debt securities, and sold those securities to Athene. Athene is Apollo's own insurance company. It sells fixed and indexed annuities, retirement savings products, to ordinary Americans. When a retiree buys an Athene annuity, they believe their money is sitting in safe, stable investments. That money is now inside a structure funding Elon Musk's AI data center. The numbers inside Athene are most alarming. Athene holds $74.2 billion in reserves. It has moved $217 billion in assets into a captive insurer based in Bermuda, meaning those assets sit outside normal US insurance regulation and oversight. Of the entire portfolio, 34.7%, equal to $103 billion, is classified as Level 3 assets. Level 3 is an accounting classification that means there is no observable market price for these assets. No outside party can independently verify what they are actually worth. The leverage sitting on top of those unpriced assets is 16 times. Burry's says: Every step of this structure is technically legal and publicly disclosed. But the entire thing was deliberately engineered across 8 to 12 steps to move credit risk off balance sheets and away from any market pricing. - Nvidia books the revenue. - Apollo collects the fees. - xAI gets the computing power. - And retirees sitting at the bottom of a 16x leveraged Bermuda insurance structure, holding $103 billion in assets with no market price carry the risk without knowing it exists.
952
4,081
16,317
4,258,819
ObserveandCreate retweeted
?????
The AI numbers are starting to look very ugly. Even under "best case" assumptions, FT's own data shows Microsoft AI ROI at -9%, Google at -15%, Meta at -28%, Oracle at -35%. Only Amazon barely comes out positive. This is exactly why I keep comparing this to the dot-com era. Incredible technology does not automatically mean sustainable economics. The internet survived. Most internet companies didn't. Right now hyperscalers are spending trillions hoping future demand catches up to present capex. That's not certainty. That's a leveraged bet.
82
683
18,830
1,057,419
ObserveandCreate retweeted
NEW: AI consultant reveals a client accidentally spent $500,000,000.00 in a single month after failing to set employee limits on Claude usage.
1,439
3,064
33,384
40,146,141
ObserveandCreate retweeted
Replying to @Polymarket
Here’s the email to employees: Team, Hope everyone’s doing well and enjoying the productivity enhancements from our AI tooling initiative. Unfortunately, Finance has asked me to clarify a small issue. It appears someone, and by “someone” I mean apparently all of you simultaneously, managed to spend $500,000,000 on @claudeai usage in a single month. For context: •NASA landed on the moon for less. •We are now the proud owner of approximately 14% of Anthropic. •Claude personally sent us a thank-you fruit basket. •Our CFO has entered a fugue state and only communicates through Slack emojis. •The electricity usage from your prompts briefly dimmed parts of Northern Virginia. While we appreciate innovation, there are concerns that: •“Can you make this email sound slightly warmer?” did not require 11,400 generations. •Asking Claude to “rewrite this in the style of Succession, Hemingway, and Tony Soprano combined” may have been excessive. •One employee appears to have used Claude to generate “a quick list of lunch options” that somehow consumed the GDP of a small island nation. Going forward, please observe the following guidelines: 1Do not upload the entire internet into Claude “for context.” 2If your prompt begins with “simulate every possible outcome,” reconsider. 3Claude should not be used to: ◦settle fantasy football disputes, ◦write your wedding vows 97 times, ◦generate revenge edits of your ex’s LinkedIn bio, ◦or ask “what if Rome had WiFi?” Most importantly: 
If you see the message: “This request may require additional datacenter construction” …please stop immediately and contact IT. Thank you all for your cooperation during this challenging yet technologically groundbreaking time. Warm regards,
Management P.S. Whoever prompted: “Generate every possible PR angle for every company founded since 1983” …we just want to talk.
121
696
6,407
805,587
ObserveandCreate retweeted
The AI numbers are starting to look very ugly. Even under "best case" assumptions, FT's own data shows Microsoft AI ROI at -9%, Google at -15%, Meta at -28%, Oracle at -35%. Only Amazon barely comes out positive. This is exactly why I keep comparing this to the dot-com era. Incredible technology does not automatically mean sustainable economics. The internet survived. Most internet companies didn't. Right now hyperscalers are spending trillions hoping future demand catches up to present capex. That's not certainty. That's a leveraged bet.
587
2,109
9,517
2,408,607
ObserveandCreate retweeted
OPENAI VALUATION: ~$700B ADOBE VALUATION: ~$98B OPENAI ANNUALIZED REVENUE: $20B ADOBE REVENUE: $23.8B And you are telling me this isn’t a bubble?
🚨 THE ENTIRE AI BOOM MIGHT BE BUILT ON FAKE REVENUE. Latest corporate filings show that OpenAI and Anthropic alone make up over half of the entire $2 trillion future cloud backlog held by Microsoft, Oracle, Google, and Amazon. This massive pipeline is actually being created through a circular accounting trick called a round trip revenue loop. But how it works ? A tech giant gives billions of dollars to an AI startup as an "investment". But hidden in the contract is a strict rule forcing the startup to hand that exact same money straight back to the tech giant to rent their computer servers. Look at the documented case of Microsoft and OpenAI. When Microsoft invested $13 billion into OpenAI, it didn't just give them cash; it gave them "cloud credits" to use Microsoft servers. OpenAI used those exact credits to train its AI models, and Microsoft then turned around and recorded that server usage as brand new "cloud revenue" from a customer. The tech giant is literally paying itself with its own money and calling it a sale. This is why OpenAI’s annual cloud bill has ballooned to over $60 billion, double its actual revenue of $25 billion, kept alive solely by this recycled funding loop. Anthropic runs the exact same play, spending $2.66 billion on Amazon Web Services in just nine months, which was basically 100% of all the money it earned at the time. This manufactured demand triggers a second accounting trick where tech giants book massive paper profits. Every time a startup gets a higher value from a new funding round, the tech giant updates the value of its investment on its books and counts that unearned paper gain as direct profit. In Q1 2026, Alphabet reported a record $62.6 billion profit, but $28.7 billion nearly half, was just a paper markup on its Anthropic investment. In the same quarter, Amazon reported $30.3 billion in profit, but $16.8 billion of it was just an Anthropic paper gain. While Amazon reported record profits, its actual free cash flow collapsed 95% to just $1.2 billion because it had to spend $44.2 billion in real cash to build physical data centers. This has created a massive danger where these giant companies rely heavily on just one or two unstable startups. Microsoft has 49% of its $627 billion future backlog tied to OpenAI, while Oracle has an incredible 54% of its entire $553 billion pipeline relying on OpenAI alone. This perfectly mirrors the 2001 dot-com crash when Global Crossing and Qwest Communications swapped identical fiber-optic network capacity with each other just to book fake sales. Qwest had to erase $1.4 billion in fake income, and Global Crossing went completely bankrupt. The only difference is that the dot-com swaps were illegal, but today's AI loop is fully legal under current accounting rules. This legal loop inflates tech company stock prices, forcing automatic retirement accounts and index funds to buy even more of these tech stocks. It is a self feeding loop where investments, sales, and stock prices all go up on paper without the AI technology ever making real cash profits.
27
103
874
112,505
ObserveandCreate retweeted
Today’s free newsletter is about how LLMs are the perfect grift to exploit an economy dominated by do-nothing managers and executives disconnected from any real work, and how the facade is crumbling as companies pay the true cost of AI. wheresyoured.at/the-revenge-…
33
423
2,159
411,394
ObserveandCreate retweeted
I think AI coding hype follows roughly four stages: 1. Amazement You try it and can’t believe how much code it generates from a few prompts. 2. Expansion You start more and more projects because shipping suddenly feels cheap and fast. This is also the phase where people start convincing everyone around them: - coworkers - management - friends in other companies because nobody wants to “fall behind” in 6–12 months. That creates a massive snowball/FOMO effect. 3. The grind phase You realize the generated code has architectural issues, sloppy mistakes, weird abstractions, duplicated logic, broken edge cases, etc. So you start: - re-prompting - switching models - increasing reasoning effort - reviewing fixes - generating fixes for previous fixes And suddenly you spend your days reviewing AI-generated pull requests instead of building software. 4. Realization You realize AI coding increases output much faster than it increases certainty. The code still needs: - review - testing - ownership - architectural understanding - long-term maintenance Usually by expensive senior engineers. And the interesting thing is: this whole cycle can take many months or even more than a year because people become socially and professionally invested in the narrative themselves. Once teams, managers, and entire companies have been convinced that this is the future, it becomes psychologically and politically very hard to later say: “Actually, the ROI is much lower than we expected.”
This is what we've been seeing with every company we work with. Try justifying spending 100k on token spend when only 18k even makes it to a stable prod feature. In the rush to maximize AI token spend, companies are wasting over 44% on bug fixes
148
394
2,052
200,083
ObserveandCreate retweeted
Uber is now questioning whether it’s actually seeing meaningful returns on its investments with AI, per the Verge
183
177
2,308
159,760
ObserveandCreate retweeted
Let me trace the timeline here because nobody's connecting it. Step 1: Scrape the entire internet. Every book, every article, every conversation, every piece of art, every forum post. Do it without asking. Do it without paying. Step 2: Train a model on all of it. Call it "artificial intelligence." Step 3: Go to BlackRock's Infrastructure Summit and announce: "We see a future where intelligence is a utility, like electricity or water, and people buy it from us on a meter." Step 3 is where you sell people's own knowledge back to them. On a meter. They took the collective output of human thought, compressed it into a model, and now they want to charge you by the token to access a version of what you and everyone you know already created. One Reddit user put it perfectly: "They stole all this data from us, the people, our life's work, creativity, art, by devouring the internet and blowing through all copyright laws. Now they want to sell it back to us in the form of a utility." Imagine if someone photocopied every book in the public library, burned the library down, and then opened a subscription service for the copies. That's the metered intelligence business model. And they're pitching it to infrastructure investors as though they invented water.
SAM ALTMAN: “WE SEE A FUTURE WHERE INTELLIGENCE IS A UTILITY, LIKE ELECTRICITY OR WATER, AND PEOPLE BUY IT FROM US ON A METER.”
3,277
46,843
136,988
5,675,858