Bringing real authority to agents which can work dynamically at @Moi_tech. Ex - @BimaBTC, @ProtocolLabs, @Filecoin, @0xPolygon

Joined October 2018
885 Photos and videos
Jun 12
Let’s bring delegated authority to these agents right to the participant level.
Meet Coinbase for Agents. Give your agent its own account to: → Execute trades & manage your portfolio → Run autonomously under guardrails → Pay for data & research tools via x402 (coming next week) Agentic finance is here, and it's powered by Coinbase.
1
1
139
Piyush retweeted
Jun 12
This is what after effect of AI only, lol. Human with ai is better where it can give delegated authority to agents with participant centric appraoch.
the CEO of a $1 trillion company has 1 direct report
1
1
3
163
Piyush retweeted
Jun 11
Open for recommendation for guests we should invite. #AI #agent #Autonomousagent
Jun 11
🚨MOI Community Call #11 Building What Comes Next Join us for ecosystem updates, builder insights, community initiatives and a special guest session. 🗓️ 19 June 2026 ⏰ 8 PM IST More details soon. Stay tuned. RSVP Today: luma.com/yl774j3t #MOI #Web3 #AI #ContextualCompute
1
1
6
178
Piyush retweeted
Jun 11
New world order for authority with @MOI_Tech , whenever the agent is created, authority with participant centricity can be provided to all of them and can be used on any blockchain be it @ethereum, @base, @solana etc.
Jun 11
Build agents on any stack. Authority flows from participants. MOI makes it verifiable for all.
2
6
12
225
Piyush retweeted
Jun 11
Without delegated authority with participant centric, this is what it looks like for agents.
what happens when you stop treating Claude Fable like a chatbot and just let it run.
1
1
4
103
Jun 10
We are looking to bring authority to agents everywhere - @Arshasays is going to be in ama of DAC where agents can be quantum secure but we will work on bringing delegated authority there on @dac_chain
Quantum computing is moving faster than the encryption protecting your money. How worried should we actually be? Hosted by @esteemedbuilds, with @davide___costa, Artur of DAC, @amateo, and @arshasays. Tomorrow, 2 PM UTC, turn on 🔔
1
8
142
Piyush retweeted
Apr 25
Recently @a16zcrypto published article about "The missing infrastructure for AI agents: 5 ways blockchains can help" where great contributor were there including @cc_crowley, @ccatalini, @ahall_research, @liz_harkavy, @nlevine19, and @psneville. And Guess What : we had build this, now looking to make it live soon - @MOI_Tech - The Participant Layer of Internet, which can solve this and beyond while catering enterprises, web2 apps and web3 dapps. Authority lives independently at the participant level. so you don’t embed it into every agent, you keep it separate, and you propagate it only when you deliberately choose to. This creates clean, controllable, and revocable control without baking permissions into every AI instance. Our Moat: Participant-Level State Management We own the participant layer. - The source of truth for “who can do what” sits with the participant, not the agent. - When the participant’s state is set to “participant,” every downstream decision (even by agents) must resolve against that single source. - Agents themselves remain completely stateless, they carry no persistent authority. Why This Matters (The Permission Problem Solved) If every agent simply “holds an API key,” you have a nightmare: - How do you give or revoke permission dynamically? - How do you enforce it across thousands of interactions without constant re-authorization? Our model flips it: - Agents need authority, they don’t own it. -Authority lives at the interaction level, issued fresh from the participant’s state on every call. - Revocation is instant and global: change the participant state once → agents lose access immediately. No chasing down API keys. Result: True Distributed Authority - Participant = Stateful (owns the rules) - Agent = Stateless (executes only what it’s handed) - Authority = Dynamically granted per interaction This gives real safety and trust to AI agents. Target Use Cases - Safe Pool of AI agents (secure, auditable multi-agent environments) - AI Governance frameworks (enterprise-grade control and compliance) - Enterprise Data Consent & KYC (solve the consent-entity problem cleanly, participants explicitly grant/revoke consent at source, KYC-compliant by design)
8
8
21
4,106
Piyush retweeted
Jun 10
Standing with crypto is always there. Hope we got the right folks behind this attack and things get sorted for users. As we stand we crypto community. Hope @Humanityprot community will get the justice. While we at @MOI_Tech believe identity can't bring trust for agents alone. Thats why we are bringing authority layer where through participant centric approach we can bring existence = identity authority memory (context). We want authority to agents part of 4th amendment, like that you can say with participant centric.
While we work on a recovery plan for everyone affected, we want you to see exactly what we see. We’ve set up a live tracker of the exploiter’s addresses and downstream transfers so our community can follow the situation in real time: transparency.humanity.org/
1
1
3
205
Jun 10
Completely agree with @mert it is great crisis where we are heading in crypto. Even the bigger crisis will be when everything is controlled by autonomous agents, without kill switch. This is where @MOI_Tech is Building Delegated authority with participant centric approach where participant can be person or company or etc. - Participant = Stateful (owns the rules) - Agent = Stateless (executes only what it’s handed) - Authority = Dynamically granted per interaction This gives real safety and trust to AI agents. No other system has achieved this. This is going to be Era of Authority.
🚨 INSIGHT: Helius CEO @mert warns crypto is heading toward a software crisis, arguing that only rigorously verified systems will survive as AI raises the stakes.
3
60
Piyush retweeted
It's not FAANG anymore. It's MANGO.
642
1,629
25,910
4,149,258
Jun 9
Lets bring Existence to humanity via authority identity memory which is tight to participants (so they control it) rather than someone else.
2 Jun 2023
Replying to @Timcast
I am on team humanity
1
2
95
Jun 9
What if @sama want to destroy his rival @terencekwok from @Humanityprot in this fashion Is there are possibility @sama arranged this. If this will be true then This can be bigger case than @SBF_FTX while they are taking your identity hope they are not using it in openai. I am against that identity should be hold how they are holding via either @worldcoin or @Humanityprot we need identity to be tied to yourself with authority and memory can be stored in your own bagpack through which we are bringing existence onchain to you rather than row in a database. And this is what we are enabling at @MOI_Tech, happy to share more and checkout our docs at docs.moi.technology
1
4
148
Jun 9
I am not alone @elonmusk also think OpenAI might be compromising the identity stuff they are getting from Worldcoin
120